What's new

Orrin Hatch destroys Dan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Do you have any specific BofM "detriments and evils of inequality" quotes?

Maybe Spazz, Colton, or Gibbs can chime in here. Trust me, it's a major theme.


This is what came to mind, and remember I did not follow or read the whole conversation.

Book of Mormon
4Nephi
2."...There were no contentions and disputations among them, and every man did deal justly one with another.
3. And they had all things common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift."
7. And the Lord did prosper them exceedingly in the land; yea, insomuch that they did build cities again where there had been cities burned.
24. And now, in this two hundred and first year there began to be among them those who were lifted up in pride, such as the wearing of costly apparel, and all manner of fine pearls, and of the fine things of the world.
25. And from that time forth they did have their goods and their substance no more common among them.
26. And they began to be divided into classes; and they began to build up churches unto themselves to get gain, and began to deny the true church of Christ.
35. And now it came to pass in this year, yea, in the two hundred and thirty and first year, there was a great division among the people.
42. And it came to pass that the wicked part of the people began again to build up the secret oaths and combinations of Gadianton.
46. And it came to pass that the robbers of Gadianton did spread over all the face of the land; and there were none that were righteous save it were the disciples of Jesus. And gold and silver did they lay up in store in abundance, and did traffic in all manner of traffic.


This is right before the two sides start fighting and it ends with the one group killing off the other group.

Not sure if this is what you were talking about, but it started with pride, and people seeking individual wealth and power while not sharing or caring for those without.

Yes is is a theme, or a cycle that tends to repeat itself.
 
On a related note, the issue I have with the left today is their seeming desire to promote a wide base of lazy leeches & not outright opposition to them ant to help those in need through government programs.

Who do you see as the wide base of lazy leeches promoted by the left?
 
Who do you see as the wide base of lazy leeches promoted by the left?

The base. There's no reason to not fix social security other than laziness and the chronic, widespread democratic party members' desire to retire early and live off the work of others for decades. The excuses and rhetoric they throw around are all b.s. The underlying desire is to get theirs at the expense of others.

It's pretty sad when, as a party, you're fully comfortable doing everything imaginable to bankrupt the safety net that is necessary for those in need. But **** those who can't help themselves so we can all leech off the system for 30+ years, right?


(that's all rant and not directed at you at all, OB)
 
Sorry, I got things mixed up a little. The quote I was thinking of is below. Read the entire original (OSC in 2008 Des News) if you'd like to understand babe's views on co-ops, unions, ground level stuff, etc.

I think your point about being in a territory is moot. He was speaking specifically to his LDS audience but also as a governor threatening to confiscate if necessary. It could be taken either way.

What I mean by controlling levels of wealth is our currently bought and paid for legilslature, media, everything. We can also look at the prior model and think of The King's Forest. Nobody is free when a few barons and kings own everything and allow us to work their land under their terms. I'd love to be a libertarian, confortable knowing people can actually control against this through their own actions but reality is it is not the case. Libertarianism is just as much a false utopia as communism is.

I don't know what they thought of him back then. I was speaking in a modern sense there. There's a quote out there which I can't recall exactly that praises Lincoln.

Maybe Spazz, Colton, or Gibbs can chime in here. Trust me, it's a major theme.

It took 10 minutes to figure out what OSC was...turned out to be a person.

I did recognize that Brigham was both church and "state" authority and so it would be hard to generalize that first quote.
It is more difficult to dismiss the quote from the economic proclamation, but I did look into the reasoning behind it...ZCMI & non-Mormon financial persecution.
So, Brigham and Co thought wealth in the hands of a few was dangerous and should be dealt with through government means. I suppose Benson would say that to confiscate their wealth (if this was the "measures" Brigham was talking about) would be legal plunder. The problem is Brigham didn't specify the "measures" in the economic proclamation and so this would only be an assumption on our parts. You don't specify the measures either besides trust busting in past conversations on hacks.

I need to clarify that I meant modern Mormons most likely agree with Lincoln's assessment of polygamy as the twin plague with slavery so they have no problem venerating the man.
This does bring up another point about Brigham. He was a polygamist, and Benson wasn't. Modern Mormons are going to go with the most current prophet dealing with more current concerns so of course they won't see a problem with the seeming reversal on the role of government in wealth redistribution.
 
The base. There's no reason to not fix social security other than laziness and the chronic, widespread democratic party members' desire to retire early and live off the work of others for decades. The excuses and rhetoric they throw around are all b.s. The underlying desire is to get theirs at the expense of others.

I think one of the better, and easier, fixes is to raise the retirement age of social security by 5-7 years. However, I don't know if that would work for occupations such as mining. Is that what you had in mind?

Although, I don't think Republicans are any better as tackling the social security demographics.
 
Why? Do you think franklin will identify a group by race, or one that has a racial imbalance? Was there such a group that first came to your mind?

Because you asked the question.

When someone talks about lazy people leaching off others does a certain race come to YOUR mind?
 
Because you asked the question.

When someone talks about lazy people leaching off others does a certain race come to YOUR mind?

Nope. If I had assumed franklin was referring to a racial group, I would not have asked him who he meant. franklin rarely spouts off on those topics.

Now, between you, franklin, and I, which of us assumed a racial element was involved? Why?
 
Nope. If I had assumed franklin was referring to a racial group, I would not have asked him who he meant. franklin rarely spouts off on those topics.

Now, between you, franklin, and I, which of us assumed a racial element was involved? Why?

You. I'm not sure why.

I'm trying to have fun with you here, man. Don't go getting all serious on me.
 
This was never really race. The media just blew it up and Hatch just saw a fundraising opportunity.

I get confused when out of the blue someone comes in and posts about the actual topic as opposed to whatever the thread has evolved into. But you're right, it obviously wasn't close.
 
Back
Top