What's new

Jazzfanz ALL-TIME Fantasy Draft

That's the main difference between you and us sir, our viewpoint isn't just NBA-focused. Not to mention that they are vastly different players, in terms of playing positions. However, of course I respect your opinion even though I kindly disagree.

They did play different positions, but when you rank one above the other, I have to consider that you are comparing the player overall. Galis may have dominated European ball in the late 70's/80's, but Dirk has been dominant in the NBA during a time when foreign players are prevalent. Dirk has shown he can do it against the best in the world. Galis has questions, in my mind.
 
I texted UGLI's mom to get a hold of him, but I haven't seen any reply yet .. I think she's kinda mad at me..
 
So far IMHO, for four players who would beat in 7 game series:
Whisky> spycam> Franklin> nightmare> Siromar> Numberica> Catchall
 
So far IMHO, for four players who would beat in 7 game series:
Whisky> spycam> Franklin> nightmare> Siromar> Numberica> Catchall

Players overrated by jazzfanz IMO include
Olijuwan, Isiah, Erving, Duncun, Ewing, DRob, KG, Howard
I also am suspect of anyone playing before 1975.
Notice that the first pick of your favorite team was first on my list of most overrated.
 
Players overrated by jazzfanz IMO include
Olijuwan, Isiah, Erving, Duncun, Ewing, DRob, KG, Howard
I also am suspect of anyone playing before 1975.
Notice that the first pick of your favorite team was first on my list of most overrated.

We're overrating Duncan and Erving??? LMAO..
 
Bro, Maravich could pass the ball. He may have some turnover issues from attempting too much razzle dazzle and forcing it, but you can't honestly say that he wasn't a great passer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aDy8BqEuyE


He was a great flashy passer, he wasn't a great fundamental passer. He wasn't worried about making anyone better, just about making himself look good.
 
They did play different positions, but when you rank one above the other, I have to consider that you are comparing the player overall. Galis may have dominated European ball in the late 70's/80's, but Dirk has been dominant in the NBA during a time when foreign players are prevalent. Dirk has shown he can do it against the best in the world. Galis has questions, in my mind.

I didn't state the difference between the players to sake of the argument, it's my poor english.

On the Galis not being better than Dirk, like I said, it's a matter of different viewpoints in my opinion. I just don't agree the basic idea of if a player isn't/wasn't in the NBA or if he hasn't proved himself in the NBA, then he's not good or can't be good as much as the ones in the NBA are. Same thing with Diamantidis for instance, only a few euro-people would select Nash over Diamantidis, I know it probably sounds ridiculous or irrational to you, but that's almost a fact for us, The Octopus>Nash.
 
Back
Top