What's new

Anti-vaccination movement is dealt a loss in court.

I well aware that I am completely ignorant on matter like how much weaponry a government should wield when trying to fulfill a search warrant and the occupant is not cooperating. I expect it depends a great deal on the sort of intelligence neither of us have access to, as well as the property itself, the history of the local occupant, etc. It's easy to pick out and second-guess after something has gone wrong.

That would depend on the type of warrant they are fulfilling. A simple one will be a cop or two with regular sidearms. Heavy ones such as drug dealers or known felons can have a full SWAT team break down the door.
 
The worked out well for the serfs in the middle ages, right?

Because our society is clearly at that level.

I'm not arguing for what Thriller said but your arguement is spectacularly ineffective.
 
Haha. I've given him troves of resources. He's not interested. Any evidence that does not come from conspiracy theory websites lacks validity in his mind. :p

And I've given him troves as well. He's not interested.
Any evidence that does not come from a government sponsored or mainstream media website lacks validity in his mind :p
 
And I've given him troves as well. He's not interested.
Any evidence that does not come from a government sponsored or mainstream media website lacks validity in his mind :p

So if his sources are all government sites that you do not accept as valid and all your sources are conspiracy sites that he does nto accept as valid why do the two of you debate?

There is no middle ground you can reach based on both of your refusals to accept any evidence the other provides.
 
So if his sources are all government sites that you do not accept as valid and all your sources are conspiracy sites that he does nto accept as valid why do the two of you debate?

There is no middle ground you can reach based on both of your refusals to accept any evidence the other provides.

We just mess with each other.

Neither of us takes the other one seriously.
 
And I've given him troves as well. He's not interested.
Any evidence that does not come from a government sponsored or mainstream media website lacks validity in his mind :p

What do you mean by government sponsored though? I tried to give you research done by private interests, foreign governments, NGOs, etc. You always find something you don't like about it. If its' not the government, then it's the media. If it's not that, then it's the science elites. If not that, then a conspiracy by secretive groups. You provided valid information about some problems in academia and the health care industry. But your evidence about the actual issues are mostly anecdotal. Just the unverified accounts of individuals.

You're a pretty intelligent person, but I think you've closed your mind to rational discussion.
 
What do you mean by government sponsored though? I tried to give you research done by private interests, foreign governments, NGOs, etc. You always find something you don't like about it. If its' not the government, then it's the media. If it's not that, then it's the science elites. If not that, then a conspiracy by secretive groups. You provided valid information about some problems in academia and the health care industry. But your evidence about the actual issues are mostly anecdotal. Just the unverified accounts of individuals.

You're a pretty intelligent person, but I think you've closed your mind to rational discussion.

After wearing tinfoil hats for so long it starts to seepinto your brain. What happens then is that your brain is coated in tinfoil and you are literally close minded.
 
Back
Top