TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
The chemical dopant would be inert.
Ok.
The chemical dopant would be inert.
This is a game-changer, guys.
What I'm saying is that during the growing a chemical should be added to the soil that can be detected in a person who smokes the pot that is produced. However, that chemical should also be metabolized by the users body at a reasonably predictable rate, like alcohol is. Ideally it would be something we could put on a scale and say a 10 means pot was consumed within the hour, a 9 means it's been 2-3 hours, an 8 equals 4-6 hours and so on. That way if you get pulled over for suspected driving under the influence of THC a test could be administered and if you were an 8 or higher you get charged with DUI.
I wonder though, would that create a new black market for "clean" weed? I like your idea, but you would need to be able to guarantee that marijuana was marked.
I was thinking about that. It's a problem and rellay complicates things. The solution I came up with is that there would have to be two markers, one that goes away quickly and one that is persistent. So if you test positive for weed, are suspected of a DUI but got a zero based on the marker you would need to have the secondary marker showing that you consumed legit weed. It get's a little cumbersome.
I never thought I'd call you a dork Stoked.... but.... dork.
Organic means it's grown without pesticides and chemicals, like everything used to be grown before the advent of pesticides and chemicals.
No ****. I was just ****ing around.
Soon I'll be able to show people pics of my grow like Gameface does with his brew. Good times.
I just wanted to say LONG LIVE MONSANTO.
Soon I'll be able to show people pics of my grow like Gameface does with his brew. Good times.