What's new
By:

Tough Stretch, Could Jazz Go 0-7

SojoDave

SojoDave

Well-Known Member
We are 13-12 after the next 7 games, will we be 13-19 after the next 7 games? Our next 7 opponents

Brooklyn
Indiana
Miami
Orlando
Golden State
Clippers
Clippers

Face it, we are not playing well and this is a tough stretch. How many of these games do you think we will win.
 
i say we win maybe 2 or 3.
 
sojodave said:
We are 13-12 after the next 7 games, will we be 13-19 after the next 7 games? Our next 7 opponents

Brooklyn win
Indiana win
Miami loose
Orlando win
Golden state win
Clippers loose
Clippers win

Face it, we are not playing well and this is a tough stretch. How many of these games do you think we will win.
Click to expand...

I am not a jazz fan becasue i am realistic... i am a jazz fan cause i ahve this crazy idea that we are better then we play and look.
 
Jazz win Indiana, Orlando and GSW.

I'm hoping they squeeze out one more win; but I'm not sure where.
 
I was thinking the same thing this morning that including the two most recent losses that the Jazz could realistically lose the next 4 games.
 
Well either way it could help us. If we turn a corner, and win some of these games we expect to lose then we'll be happy.

If we lose most of these games the pressure goes back on the vets, and Corbin. Maybe some changes will be made.
 
Revolution 9 said:
Well either way it could help us. If we turn a corner, and win some of these games we expect to lose then we'll be happy.

If we lose most of these games the pressure goes back on the vets, and Corbin. Maybe some changes will be made.
Click to expand...

So are you saying that this might be a win win stretch for the Jazz?
 
The worst case scenario is actually the best case scenario. We lose all 7 and it finally should get through to their thick heads that we have to look to the future and focus on developing the young guys, including Burks.
 
help me out please.... but i can not think of one team besides The Thunder who played a bunch of young guys all at once and it paid off?... most championship teams are very balanced between young and vets. and who knows thunder may never win it... we dont know. but i can tell you i can think of a team who said lets go youth and won it all. just saying... the jazz need to learn to win. this team is capable of great things. they play like 2 different teams, sometimes they are great and show up the best in the west, other days they would loose to a high school girls team.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
The worst case scenario is actually the best case scenario. We lose all 7 and it finally should get through to their thick heads that we have to look to the future and focus on developing the young guys, including Burks.
Click to expand...

You do know that that will never happen, do you? Until we're completely out of the playoffs, that won't happen.
 
JGolds said:
help me out please.... but i can not think of one team besides Then Thunder who played a bunch of young guys all at once and it paid off?... most championship teams are very balanced between young and vets. and who knows thunder may never win it... we dont know. but i can tell you i can think of a team who said lets go youth and won it all. just saying... the jazz need to learn to win. this team is capable of great things. they play like 2 different teams, sometimes they are great and show up the best in the west, other days they would loose to a high school girls team.
Click to expand...

Golden State is doing pretty well starting rookie Barnes and sophomore Thompson

EDIT- AND after tanking it all last season despite the win now talks.
 
Weezur said:
Golden State is doing pretty well starting rookie Barnes and sophomore Thompson

EDIT- AND after tanking it all last season despite the win now talks.
Click to expand...

they are a very balnced team right now. their average age is probably 27.... thats decent, a team in its prime even.
 
Weezur said:
Golden State is doing pretty well starting rookie Barnes and sophomore Thompson

EDIT- AND after tanking it all last season despite the win now talks.
Click to expand...

but they are doing pretty well concidering last seasons tank. but there are a few differences, they have a PG and play defence.... youth wont really give us either of those, slight improvment on D but thats all i can see changing. i think utah has done a very good job at rebuilding while winning. they have had two good teams since i can remember. the d-will years were good and so were the mid to late stockton and malone years... and in between we stayed rather competitive most years. i think we will reach higher this time with some of the guys on this roster then we ever did with d-will.. paitents is a key though... not loosing.
 
JGolds said:
they are a very balnced team right now. their average age is probably 27.... thats decent, a team in its prime even.
Click to expand...

But i thought you were talking more about being balance among the starters and distribution of minutes.

They have a 23 year old starting point guard, 22 year old starting shooting guard, 20 year old small forward, 29 year old power forward, and a 23 year old center as thier starting line up.

Also the 29 year old is david lee who is CLEARLY better than anyone else they could start at power forward. (unlike the jazz situation where al and paul are not much if any better than enes and derrick)
 
fishonjazz said:
But i thought you were talking more about being balance among the starters and distribution of minutes.

They have a 23 year old starting point guard, 22 year old starting shooting guard, 20 year old small forward, 29 year old power forward, and a 23 year old center as thier starting line up.

Also the 29 year old is david lee who is CLEARLY better than anyone else they could start at power forward. (unlike the jazz situation where al and paul are not much if any better than enes and derrick)
Click to expand...

true enough i guess. then only big difference is the PG i guess.. and that we dont have. GSW are def an exception lol.. oung core that they have built around... lets see where they sit at the end of the year i guess. i just dont feel going all young will benifit utah.
 
fishonjazz said:
But i thought you were talking more about being balance among the starters and distribution of minutes.

They have a 23 year old starting point guard, 22 year old starting shooting guard, 20 year old small forward, 29 year old power forward, and a 23 year old center as thier starting line up.

Also the 29 year old is david lee who is CLEARLY better than anyone else they could start at power forward. (unlike the jazz situation where al and paul are not much if any better than enes and derrick)
Click to expand...

p.s. if you started with Big Al you would suck at DEF EFF too.....
 
fishonjazz said:
But i thought you were talking more about being balance among the starters and distribution of minutes.

They have a 23 year old starting point guard, 22 year old starting shooting guard, 20 year old small forward, 29 year old power forward, and a 23 year old center as thier starting line up.

Also the 29 year old is david lee who is CLEARLY better than anyone else they could start at power forward. (unlike the jazz situation where al and paul are not much if any better than enes and derrick)
Click to expand...
They're playing Landry off the bench who is playing well for them

Strange, it wasn't long ago when Millsap > Lee.

Also, we will win one of the Clipper games. You historically split b2b games against the same team.
 
sojodave said:
We are 13-12 after the next 7 games, will we be 13-19 after the next 7 games? Our next 7 opponents

Brooklyn
Indiana
Miami
Orlando
Golden State
Clippers
Clippers

Face it, we are not playing well and this is a tough stretch. How many of these games do you think we will win.
Click to expand...

...why you beez stealin my thread? I'm the one that started it with the classic "Next Jazz win?.....2013!" Why you be dissin a bro like that???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top