Marvin is really struggling. The three position in this offense is tough and he has not meshed with it yet. 3 of the last 4 games he has not scored. Tyrone Corbin said after the game that it might be time for some tweeks.
Big Al
Millsap
Demarre
Foye
Burks
Kanter backs up Big Al.
Favors backs up Millsap.
Marvin backs up Demarre.
Hayward backs up Foye.
Tinsley backs up Burks until Mo comes back.
Watson plays garbage minutes with Evans and Murphy.
David Locke wrote:
So there might be some changes in the starting lineup.
I'll like to point out that I don't agree with everything Corbin has done. But fans can't say "Play the youth" "Develop for the future" and then when Corbin plays the youth together they argue they want mix and match of the lineups. He's playing them together so they can learn to play together.
You can't say Sloan would lead this team to great heights and then argue that Corbin leans to much on Sloan system.
You can't have it both ways. And when ppl start playing both sides of an argument to attack the coach on all sides I personally don't like it.
My arguement has always been the same.... play the guys that are producing the most. Crazy i know.
Basically play marvin less and never play watson at all.... give those minutes to our better players (burks, hayward, carroll, foye)
Maybe play millsap at the 3 a little more so that kanter and favors can get more minutes too.
I'll like to point out that I don't agree with everything Corbin has done. But fans can't say "Play the youth" "Develop for the future" and then when Corbin plays the youth together they argue they want mix and match of the lineups. He's playing them together so they can learn to play together.
You can't say Sloan would lead this team to great heights and then argue that Corbin leans to much on Sloan system.
You can't have it both ways. And when ppl start playing both sides of an argument to attack the coach on all sides I personally don't like it.
If you take Al out of the lineup the 3 point shooter get less space, Millsap is the focal point of the offense and more importantly of the opposing defense. You want more movement but do you think this lineup has player that can hit a jump shot of a curl? Probably one of the best ones at that is actually Marvin Williams. You want Favors to play an offense that suits him better but which PG in our roster is great on the PnR with him? Maybe Hayward can play the ball handler there but G was having quite the TO trouble with it at the beginning of the year was he not? You think sitting Al would increase our PG defense? News flash. Most if not ALL of the PG's in the roster are AWFUL defending the PnR. Did you know that the "black hole" in offense in Al had the highest Pure Point Guard Rating of ALL the centers in the NBA? Just the other day I was playing with synergy. Al Jefferson was the 22nd BEST PnR Roll-man defender in the entire NBA and the best on the Jazz. Did you know that? That isn't the problem. The problem is when the ball handler gets into the lane. You can go on and on and diss Al all you want but not all of the fault in that scenario is his fault now is it?
If you take Al out of the lineup the 3 point shooter get less space, Millsap is the focal point of the offense and more importantly of the opposing defense. You want more movement but do you think this lineup has player that can hit a jump shot of a curl?
Probably one of the best ones at that is actually Marvin Williams. You want Favors to play an offense that suits him better but which PG in our roster is great on the PnR with him?
You think sitting Al would increase our PG defense? News flash. Most if not ALL of the PG's in the roster are AWFUL defending the PnR.
Did you know that the "black hole" in offense in Al had the highest Pure Point Guard Rating of ALL the centers in the NBA? Just the other day I was playing with synergy. Al Jefferson was the 22nd BEST PnR Roll-man defender in the entire NBA and the best on the Jazz. Did you know that? That isn't the problem. The problem is when the ball handler gets into the lane. You can go on and on and diss Al all you want but not all of the fault in that scenario is his fault now is it?
Yes, I do. Hayward can hit that jumpshot. Foye can hit that jumpshot. Marvin can hit that jumpshot. Mo can hit that jumpshot. Burks can hit that jumpshot. Carroll can hit that jumpshot. Millsap can hit that jumpshot. Kanter can hit that shot. Heck, even Favors can hit it. In fact, the only players that can't hit that jumpshot are Tinsley, Watson, Evans and Al. This is why the offense gets better without Al. Players like Marvin and Hayward can actually move, get touches and shots, and be more effective. Al kills movement, and when that happens players don't get touches, and they don't try as hard. Everyone wants to score.
Mo, Burks, Hayward.
Absolutely. Because Favors and Kanter and Millsap all do a better job defending the rim. Let's say you have Mo and Favors defending the PNR. Millsap or Kanter is the other big. When Mo and Favors do a horrible job defending it, instead of watching the pg/big get a layup, Millsap/Kanter would actually slide over on their rotation and make a play. Al doesn't do that. He gives players a little slap on the butt when they fly by him.
I answered your question above. Al very rarely defends the PNR.
Al is the beginning of Utah's problems. Once he is gone, it will be shocking how much better this team will be. You think Carmello was holding Denver back? At least Carmello was a winner and could carry a team. Al can do neither.
I bet the Thunder are feeling pretty stupid right about now. Can you imagine how much better Durant and Westbrook would be if they had spent their first three years on the bench of a mediocre playoff team instead of on the court losing?
Doesn't matter who they are made up by. Your still hand picking stats (ala Locke) to prove a point. In this case the usage is so low as to be laughable.If you are referring to my post. You can go and bother Sinergy for their "made up stats".
Doesn't matter who they are made up by. Your still hand picking stats (ala Locke) to prove a point. In this case the usage is so low as to be laughable.
.
We really don't run a PNR offense so how would we know how the players run it.
We also don't run that curl shot anymore. So how would we know how players are going to shoot it. There are 2 players running a PNR. Maybe none of our guards can run it because the team doesn't work on it. Maybe it's because our main scoring option (al) can't run it. Maybe it's because when we run it with a guy other than Al, He's in the way and there is no space to run it.
Now you respond like Locke. Sound just like him as well.Mo Williams used 25% of his offense tracked on Sinergy Sports on the PnR ball handler. The #1 type of shot he took.
Or maybe Al steps on their feet, or Corbin informs the other team before hand what they will do. I bring up stats by a reputable source and you accuse me of making up stats and then go on on a what if scenarios. Someone might say you're the one making stuff up.
Shareef Abdur-Rahim....Look it up.