We are 3 deep at SG (Hayward, Burks and Murphy). No other position on the team is that deep right now. SF with Marvin and Hayward is probably next. This team needs a couple of PG's most, and backup bigs 2nd. SF I would put 3rd because marvin is not long for this team. That makes SG our position of least need. And SG has probably our best player last year in Hayward and a good solid player in Burks. If Hayward plays SF next year it will be because Burks has outplayed Marvin and moved himself there. Making a rotation of the 3 at 2 spots with Murphy as deep bench either way. So no I don't see SG as a position of need at all.Not a need? Who's under contract? Burks, Hayward, and that rookie guy. That's it for shooting guards, and if Hayward is at the 3 than it's only Burks. The team has just as much need at the 2 as they do at the 3, 4, and 5, in fact they need a 2 more than a 3 because of Marvin.
Foye is on the list. I would rather someone steal him away, because he would start over Burks thanks to his unreal 3 point shot. Forget the fact that he can't defend the 2 and has no other offensive game besides the 3 point shot. I vote draft. Burks can hold his own at the 2, and a fourteenth pick would still be a lower pick than Burks and seeing as Burks has two years of experience on him, Burks would start over him.
We are 3 deep at SG (Hayward, Burks and Murphy). No other position on the team is that deep right now. SF with Marvin and Hayward is probably next. This team needs a couple of PG's most, and backup bigs 2nd. SF I would put 3rd because marvin is not long for this team. That makes SG our position of least need. And SG has probably our best player last year in Hayward and a good solid player in Burks. If Hayward plays SF next year it will be because Burks has outplayed Marvin and moved himself there. Making a rotation of the 3 at 2 spots with Murphy as deep bench either way. So no I don't see SG as a position of need at all.
I would be frustrated with every single one of those suggestions. Again we don't need a SG. We don't need a PG who's really a SG and can't shoot. We don't need Mo.What do you think about getting Evans and letting him play a little pg, playing along side Burks and Hayward? I remember watching Evans give Dwill a terrible time when he would guard him a few years ago. I really think the Jazz could steal Evans for a pretty respectable contract. I like him because hes a big guard that rebounds the ball, yes he does get shot happy sometimes but hes a decent player.
Do you guys think that we could see Utah go and sign a few solid 3pt shooters like Mayo, Reddick, and resign Mo Williams? Mayo off the bench with Reddick at the 2 , while starting Mo at pg could really open up the middle for Favors/Kanter
Foye shot 41% from DT, but so did Hayward
This season. Hayward's numbers were 5th best in the league from December on. Foye just took a lot of shots, and it is too tempting for Ty to start him over Burks. I would like him as a 10 minutes a night kind of y.gu