What's new

Dennis Schröder is not attending the 2013 NBA Draft

I think #14 is too high. I say get a big at #14 and then Schroeder or Larkin at #21. One of those guys will drop to us. Schroeder MIGHT have the potential to become a starter in a few years. Larkin is better now, but will always be a backup. Either way, we can fill 2 of the PG spots with the #21 and signing Tinsley for another year. Then the Jazz use FA to either bring in a starter or just sign a 1-yr interim guy until picking someone up at the deadline via trade.
 
I think #14 is too high. I say get a big at #14 and then Schroeder or Larkin at #21. One of those guys will drop to us. Schroeder MIGHT have the potential to become a starter in a few years. Larkin is better now, but will always be a backup. Either way, we can fill 2 of the PG spots with the #21 and signing Tinsley for another year. Then the Jazz use FA to either bring in a starter or just sign a 1-yr interim guy until picking someone up at the deadline via trade.

I wouldn't count on it... Bucks could take Larkin, BOS could take Schroeder... Not to mention the Hawks looking for a solid backup PG.
 
Btw a comparison for Schröder's (realistic not daydreaming) upside I just came up with is Jameer Nelson offensively(Solid contributor. Willing passer. Does a little bit of everything) and Rondo defensively.
 
Btw a comparison for Schröder's (realistic not daydreaming) upside I just came up with is Jameer Nelson offensively(Solid contributor. Willing passer. Does a little bit of everything) and Rondo defensively.

I see George Hill.
 
I remember Hill's defense as not convincing(But I might be mistaken on it. Fell asleep too often on Pacers games this season). And I think Dennis has better court vision and passing skills.

Hill isn't really a PG... he's just not that quick...


Yeah you're right I think Dennis has better court vision and better passing skills too, already at this stage.
 
Back
Top