LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
We did get back together and things have been great. While this thread was melting down last evening I was actually at a ZZ Top concert with her, where we brought the average age and MC-affiliation rates down considerably.
I was unsure if people remembered that there was a pretty ugly period of time about a year and a half ago so I didn't want to delve deeply into it, but this is the big reason that I had a lot of empathy when I heard about Archie's situation.
Good for you kicky.
Also, ZZ Top puts on one hell of a concert.
So it seems some people are taking the age divided by 2 plus 7 thing as the age you should date. Isn't that supposed to be the lower end? Would there be a higher end or does that matter as much? I mean, I am 43, and would have no problem dating someone in her mid-20's, but I would shy away from going much older than, say, 50 at this point. But actually I find myself more attracted to women in my general age range - 35-45. I supposed that is normal, but given biology geared toward passing on our genetic material, it seems to me to make sense that anyone and everyone would be attracted to people that seem to be in the prime child-bearing/rearing years. If that is the case, is it really a terrible thing if a 43 year old man is dating a 23 year old woman, or vice versa?