Big difference between wanting Sloan to get with the times rather than be so rigid and feeling that Corbin is simply not a good coach.
They may have both been the subject of our bitching, but Sloan was never viewed as inept.
That is precisely right.
Big difference between wanting Sloan to get with the times rather than be so rigid and feeling that Corbin is simply not a good coach.
They may have both been the subject of our bitching, but Sloan was never viewed as inept.
A thousand times?
So you wouldn't re-ride?Been there, done that.
So you wouldn't re-ride?
Monster restraint, you have.Not a 1000 times.
41 to 45. If a team with Michael Ruffin as a core player can win half the games for us, this team certainly can.
That joke is as funny as AIDS tbh
Poor form. I'll leave it at that.
You'll learn. No biggie.
Did I accept your mentor request? No.
Don't blame me for you.
Maybe I overstated some. However, Corbin did the same thing that Sloan did, namely take a team of no name players to a better than .5 season. Where's the difference?
Maybe I'm missing something... which team would that be?