framer
Well-Known Member
Imo you should separate out the "PF/C" from the true centers. You would get very different lists, but if a player logs significant minutes at the PF spot they are not really a center per se, imo. Most of the time a PF is the centerpiece of the Jazz offense, and so if I player could sub out either Malone or Tag, then that player would get significantly different options in the offense and defense. Gobert is likely to be playing only the center spot with maybe the occasional stint defending the opposing team's PF, but he is unlikely to get the same level of offensive attention the PF will get in our offensive schemes.
I think his company would have to be more guys like Eaton, Tag, Paultz, Ortiz, Spencer, Austin, Collins, Fess, etc. and less the Carrs, Fosters, Clarks, Jeffersons, and Browns.
You could even argue that Malone was a PF/C considering he was often defended by the opposing team's center as the better big-man defender and he was often called on to guard the opposing team's best big-man which was more than occasionally a center. He is obviously more a PF than C, unlike Duncan who was predominantly a Center first and PF second, but the case could still be made.
Remember that I am going back into the New Orleans Jazz times, so I am not going to sort out how much time Jeff Wilkins played at forward. Also, even if you include c/f it is still not that difficult to climb the ladder. It is looking like Mike Brown may be in the top 10, so the barrier for entry isn't really that high. What I am seeing is that the Utah Jazz have really struggled at the position, and we probably have two, possibly 3 of the top 7 centers (even part time) to ever play for us on the roster right now when all is said and done.