What's new

To Escape Boredom...

The Thriller

Well-Known Member
My Singles Ward stinks. It's the Bucks of singles wards. No hotties and the dudes are all nerds. Priesthood is 3rd hour and for some reason the teachers feel like reading a paragraph out of the manual and asking a question and then somehow tying it to Home Teaching is good teaching and invites spiritual enlightenment.

In order to escape boredom... What do you do?

I used to be able to check on my fantasy football team. Not anymore.

Now what? Read comments from the tribune? Play Flabby Birds?

What do you do to escape boredom?
 
I'm in a family ward but my friends and I use GroupMe. We just send eachother dumb GIFS and talk about sports and people we hate.

You can also just browse Jazzfanz?
 
Easy. Get married and pop out a kid or two. Use them as an excuse not to go to class.

On a serious note, ave you volunteered to teach? If you haven't, your complaints are not valid in my view. If you aren't willing to do anything about it, STFU.
 
Easy. Get married and pop out a kid or two. Use them as an excuse not to go to class.

On a serious note, ave you volunteered to teach? If you haven't, your complaints are not valid in my view. If you aren't willing to do anything about it, STFU.

I thought about going into law... But instead, I teach Monday - Friday 8:00am-2:15pm to high schoolers.

At church, I've been an Elders Quorum teacher twice for a total of 3-4 years. Currently, I'm in a position in Sunday School.

So yeah, I know a lil about teaching. Reading from the manual because you didn't look at it until halfway through Sacrament meeting isn't what I'd call "teaching."

I think I just need to find a new singles ward. If there were any girls I cared about I'd maybe be able to dig some more motivation to stick things out...
 
Don't go?

Can't.

What happens if it really is true? Then I'm screwed.

And, Singles Wards are supposed to have hotties. UVU wards? Were amazing.

Gotta find a good place back down there.

My current ward?

Sucks. Literally, most of the RS could play Offensive Line for BYU right now. Watching the girls here is about as sexy as a topless Delonte West.

And the dudes are weirdos. For FHE they watched The Gods Must Be Crazy...

I have no idea why only 6 people showed up. We forfeit every single ward bball game. Bball is something that used to always bring our wards together (to beat up the other wards). Apparently not.

Gotta do something to fight the boredom. So I got onto jazzfanz.com
 
Can't.

What happens if it really is true? Then I'm screwed.

And, Singles Wards are supposed to have hotties. UVU wards? Were amazing.

Gotta find a good place back down there.

My current ward?

Sucks. Literally, most of the RS could play Offensive Line for BYU right now. Watching the girls here is about as sexy as a topless Delonte West.

And the dudes are weirdos. For FHE they watched The Gods Must Be Crazy...

I have no idea why only 6 people showed up. We forfeit every single ward bball game. Bball is something that used to always bring our wards together (to beat up the other wards). Apparently not.

Gotta do something to fight the boredom. So I got onto jazzfanz.com

Raises an interesting question: is it better to half-*** it or to stay away completely, in terms of eternal salvation? Is it better to go boating instead of church, for example, or to go to church and either gossip or in some other way have bad feelings towards people in the ward? Is it better to treat church as a meat market so it is tolerable, or to ask some girl out to go to the zoo or whatever on Sunday instead?
 
Raises an interesting question: is it better to half-*** it or to stay away completely, in terms of eternal salvation? Is it better to go boating instead of church, for example, or to go to church and either gossip or in some other way have bad feelings towards people in the ward? Is it better to treat church as a meat market so it is tolerable, or to ask some girl out to go to the zoo or whatever on Sunday instead?

Mind blown.

Someone smarter please respond. Tell me what I'm supposed to think
 
Mind blown.

Someone smarter please respond. Tell me what I'm supposed to think

My wife and I had this discussion because it involved her brother at the time. He was not raised in the church and after her mission she taught him along with the missionaries in the area and he got baptized (aged 15 at the time). Then he went completely inactive because their mom was married to someone in the military and they moved a lot and neither her mother nor her husband at the time (the marital relationships in that family are way too complicated to explain in a simple post, even a babe-sized post) cared at all about the church, so he had no impetus to go. Now many years later he doesn't even acknowledge that he was baptized and it means nothing to him at all. He is a great guy, one of the better people I know, and I think a better person than a lot of people I see on Sundays at church. So if he didn't have that covenant of baptism hanging over him would he be better off in terms off eternal salvation?

So we have discussed the question of whether she did him a favor, or set him up for damnation, by introducing the church to him and helping him find his way to baptism. We are to be judged based on our knowledge, at least partly, and how well we held to those covenants we have entered into, at least the way I understand it, so my take is that it is better to not know the church than to join or enter into covenants if you are not going to go at it full-steam ahead. I think partially active is worse than totally non-active status, to put it another way. I have no idea if that is right, and am very open to other ideas on the topic. But it seems to me you are better off just dropping the whole thing rather than half-assing it and piling judgement on top of judgement, so to speak.
 
My wife and I had this discussion because it involved her brother at the time. He was not raised in the church and after her mission she taught him along with the missionaries in the area and he got baptized (aged 15 at the time). Then he went completely inactive because their mom was married to someone in the military and they moved a lot and neither her mother nor her husband at the time (the marital relationships in that family are way too complicated to explain in a simple post, even a babe-sized post) cared at all about the church, so he had no impetus to go. Now many years later he doesn't even acknowledge that he was baptized and it means nothing to him at all. He is a great guy, one of the better people I know, and I think a better person than a lot of people I see on Sundays at church. So if he didn't have that covenant of baptism hanging over him would he be better off in terms off eternal salvation?

So we have discussed the question of whether she did him a favor, or set him up for damnation, by introducing the church to him and helping him find his way to baptism. We are to be judged based on our knowledge, at least partly, and how well we held to those covenants we have entered into, at least the way I understand it, so my take is that it is better to not know the church than to join or enter into covenants if you are not going to go at it full-steam ahead. I think partially active is worse than totally non-active status, to put it another way. I have no idea if that is right, and am very open to other ideas on the topic. But it seems to me you are better off just dropping the whole thing rather than half-assing it and piling judgement on top of judgement, so to speak.

There is a huge difference in attending a family ward as a single individual (or family member) vs attending a family ward (as a husband or father) vs attending a singles ward.

Your relative was attending family wards (or used to) as an individual. They can sometimes really stand out or get lost in the shuffle depending on the ward. Had he made good lasting relationships and not moved around perhaps he would have stayed active long enough to realize more what the church was all about and then decide whether or not to stick with it. had he stuck with it until he got married, perhaps being married would have "opened his eyes" to the spiritual enlightenment of eternal marriage and love and whatever it is I'm supposed to be striving for.

Attending a family ward because you're a family is different. Especially, if you've done the whole mission, temple marriage, etc thing. I'd think if you lacked motivation to go your wife could talk to you. Or yell at you. Or knock some sense into you. Perhaps as a father you have more of a sense of duty to keep going and to keep renewing that spirituality.

For single adults who have been off their missions for a time but haven't tied the knot/have but are now divorced, why the hell keep going? The whole purpose of the singles ward is to find somebody to tie the knot. If, however, your ward sucks, the whole purpose of that ward is frustrated. Might as well go to a family ward where spiritual enlightenment/maintenance is key. Current rules prohibit the "ward hopping" that was going on in the past. Otherwise, I would have blown this ward after the first week of sports forfeiting, weirdo FHE program, etc. and rejoined my past singles ward which was pretty fun, spiritually nourishing, and socially enjoyable.

Several years ago while serving in the Elders Quorum Presidency of another (better) singles ward I heard that many leaders were concerned with the alarming statistics of mid/late 20s single adults going inactive. I didn't really understand it until... Well... this past year. When the singles ward I've attended has been not too fun (both the women aren't attractive and the men aren't sociable). I can gain spiritual enlightenment by taking a nice walk up the canyon or enjoying nature. If the ward isn't worth attending then what's the point? Might as well attend a sacrament meeting at a family ward and enjoy the rest of the Sabbath outside.

I also get the whole callings, home teaching, service stuff. You're supposed to be doing that too. I suppose that helps you to "stick" to it. I see gains in interest level when that stuff is done. So I guess maybe that needs to be a focus...

Wow, what a weird direction this thread has taken. I originally was just really bored in Priesthood today... Without Football I was lost.
 
You raise another tangential question in my mind. Is it right to allow someone to be baptized mere weeks after being introduced to the church at all? Are they being set up for success or failure. To your point, a lot depends on the ward, and is that enough to hinge the eternal salvation of another individual on just so we can up the church's official tally by 1 on any given Saturday? Would it be better to get them to associate with the church, attend a lot of meetings, maybe give them the year they normally have to be a member before attending the temple to attend meetings and decide if they want to commit to the church? I know some people can make that commitment from the get-go, but many cannot. Is that fair to the many?
 
There is a huge difference in attending a family ward as a single individual (or family member) vs attending a family ward (as a husband or father) vs attending a singles ward.

Your relative was attending family wards (or used to) as an individual. They can sometimes really stand out or get lost in the shuffle depending on the ward. Had he made good lasting relationships and not moved around perhaps he would have stayed active long enough to realize more what the church was all about and then decide whether or not to stick with it. had he stuck with it until he got married, perhaps being married would have "opened his eyes" to the spiritual enlightenment of eternal marriage and love and whatever it is I'm supposed to be striving for.

Attending a family ward because you're a family is different. Especially, if you've done the whole mission, temple marriage, etc thing. I'd think if you lacked motivation to go your wife could talk to you. Or yell at you. Or knock some sense into you. Perhaps as a father you have more of a sense of duty to keep going and to keep renewing that spirituality.

For single adults who have been off their missions for a time but haven't tied the knot/have but are now divorced, why the hell keep going? The whole purpose of the singles ward is to find somebody to tie the knot. If, however, your ward sucks, the whole purpose of that ward is frustrated. Might as well go to a family ward where spiritual enlightenment/maintenance is key. Current rules prohibit the "ward hopping" that was going on in the past. Otherwise, I would have blown this ward after the first week of sports forfeiting, weirdo FHE program, etc. and rejoined my past singles ward which was pretty fun, spiritually nourishing, and socially enjoyable.

Several years ago while serving in the Elders Quorum Presidency of another (better) singles ward I heard that many leaders were concerned with the alarming statistics of mid/late 20s single adults going inactive. I didn't really understand it until... Well... this past year. When the singles ward I've attended has been not too fun (both the women aren't attractive and the men aren't sociable). I can gain spiritual enlightenment by taking a nice walk up the canyon or enjoying nature. If the ward isn't worth attending then what's the point? Might as well attend a sacrament meeting at a family ward and enjoy the rest of the Sabbath outside.

I also get the whole callings, home teaching, service stuff. You're supposed to be doing that too. I suppose that helps you to "stick" to it. I see gains in interest level when that stuff is done. So I guess maybe that needs to be a focus...

Wow, what a weird direction this thread has taken. I originally was just really bored in Priesthood today... Without Football I was lost.

Lots of good points to be sure. I guess one reason to keep going is because we are commanded to. Part of being worthy of going to the temples is regularly attending your meetings. If it matters, you will make it work for you. If it doesn't really matter to you then it is easy to get distracted and pulled away.

Remember Elder Ellis' talk in general conference when he said this bit:

Another question is “Where are we needed?” For 16 years I served in the presidency of the Houston Texas North Stake. Many moved to our area during those years. We would often receive a phone call announcing someone moving in and asking which was the best ward. Only once in 16 years did I receive a call asking, “Which ward needs a good family? Where can we help?”

Another way to put it is bloom where you are planted. Maybe YOU are supposed to be the one to turn things around in that ward. Be the change you wish you could see in the world. Right?
 
I get that single wards are met so you can find "the one" but I believe there should be a little more to it. Also maybe if you gave these "ugly girls" a chance you might find out one of them is the one, maybe there's a reason you were brought to this horrible ward...maybe not, maybe you should just find a new one, but I'm guessing you could make a little more of an effort to be less shallow and get to know these people. That being said you might be the nicest most wonderful person in th world and the people there really do suck, I guess that's for you to decide. However, since you seem to believe the point of going is to check out hotties like its a club, you might try digging a little deeper.

Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
I get that single wards are met so you can find "the one" but I believe there should be a little more to it. Also maybe if you gave these "ugly girls" a chance you might find out one of them is the one, maybe there's a reason you were brought to this horrible ward...maybe not, maybe you should just find a new one, but I'm guessing you could make a little more of an effort to be less shallow and get to know these people. That being said you might be the nicest most wonderful person in th world and the people there really do suck, I guess that's for you to decide. However, since you seem to believe the point of going is to check out hotties like its a club, you might try digging a little deeper.

Sent from the JazzFanz app


This is thriller we're talking about...
 
This is thriller we're talking about...

images


Nah, who am I kidding. He's absolutely right. I'm a jackwagon.

:)

meh maybe I'll just stick this one through, try to make the best of this lottery bound ward, and then bail once the school year ends to take my talents to South Beach Orem...

Seriously though, meh, I'll try to make the best of this situation. It's bad news bears though. The ward makes some of those Brazilian wards with 600 members baptized and 45 members active I saw on my mission look like they're close knit and well organized...

At least Jazzfanz didn't fail to destroy my boredom. Nor did it fail in enlightening me and giving me pause in my reasoning. I'm reflecting upon stuff today and we'll see if reevaluation is necessary. I'm just in "meh" when it comes to church stuff these days. NFL is so much more entertaining. And walking outside and cruising up and down Provo Canyon is so beautiful.
 
On a serious note, ave you volunteered to teach? If you haven't, your complaints are not valid in my view. If you aren't willing to do anything about it, STFU.

I was pissed when I got a new calling and they released me as EQ teacher. Most of our guys do exactly what Thriller's guys do: "Uh, can I have a volunteer to read? Let's start with the first paragraph there...". No discussion, no thought, no preparation, no spiritual enhancement. I can't freaking stand it. I have no idea if I'm a good teacher or not, but at the very worst, I get a TON out of the lesson when I teach it. It's never from me, or my thoughts, it's always something I get from someone else in the class; an idea, thought, or even vibe.

tl;dr -- ****ty teachers really are ****ty.

Raises an interesting question: is it better to half-*** it or to stay away completely, in terms of eternal salvation? Is it better to go boating instead of church, for example, or to go to church and either gossip or in some other way have bad feelings towards people in the ward? Is it better to treat church as a meat market so it is tolerable, or to ask some girl out to go to the zoo or whatever on Sunday instead?

Since I really have no idea what God thinks about this question, I just go with my gut. Usually, I'll ask myself what I would do as a father or how I would judge my child given the same scenario. Maybe that's totally wrong and I'm going to fry for it, but I don't think so. I would say that I know I won't fry for it, but people who claim to know things about religion need to have their faces rubbed in my butt-cleavage.

tl;dr -- Do whatever you're comfortable with, but don't kid yourself on what "comfortable with" means.

My wife and I had this discussion because it involved her brother at the time...

... So we have discussed the question of whether she did him a favor, or set him up for damnation, by introducing the church to him and helping him find his way to baptism.

This wasn't a real conversation, was it? I feel like I know you fairly well, and you don't strike me as a gloom/doom kind of Mo. Can you imagine a God that is so black and white? Can you imagine a God that doesn't know what the circumstances of each and every one of his children's lives are/were? I have a feeling that "damnation", if there really is such a thing (I seriously have my doubts), would be reserved for the worst of the worst of the worst. I don't think that the world, in all its infinite nastiness, has ever produced someone worthy of damnation. (before you jump on my sack about Hitler, etc., you have to remember that at some point, every person on this planet was a good person, had good intentions, and had love in their hearts. Over time, and due to who-knows-what, they somehow went a different path. Who knows why or how, but I don't believe anyone has ever willfully chosen to be worthy of true damnation.)

tl;dr -- Don't be silly, of course she didn't set him up for damnation. Probably.

We are to be judged based on our knowledge, at least partly, and how well we held to those covenants we have entered into, at least the way I understand it,

Stupid scenario: When the Mo's found me I was a big time smoker, and when I promised that I'd quit, it was a piece of cake. I seriously had maybe a day or two that were rough, but other than that, it was easy as pie and I never thought about it. My hypothetical neighbor on the other hand, smoked just as long as I did and quit the same day I did. He made a wonderful effort, and he went through the temple and made the same promises I did, but he thought about smoking every day. It was a struggle for him, big time. He finally succumbed to his addictive nature and picked up the habit again. Question for you: Because my brain and body luckily had no problem kicking the habit, (see also that I, as a person/human/spiritual being essentially had nothing to do with it) I will have preferential treatment at the judgment seat versus my neighbor who struggled with it for years? Assume my neighbor was a STUD in every other sense and lived his life better than most Mo's. Does it still mean that he'll receive a lesser degree of glory than me?

tl;dr -- That's crazy talk, man. Would you damn your own child for breaking a promise?

so my take is that it is better to not know the church than to join or enter into covenants if you are not going to go at it full-steam ahead. I think partially active is worse than totally non-active status, to put it another way. I have no idea if that is right, and am very open to other ideas on the topic. But it seems to me you are better off just dropping the whole thing rather than half-assing it and piling judgement on top of judgement, so to speak.

Again, I'm surprised that this is your line of thinking. I'd rather watch my child try something and fail, even if it's over and over, than to watch them just say, "You know what, I'm not any good at *insert something stupid here*, and I'd rather not put my *** on the line for any reason -- so I'll just play it safe and do nothing". I'm not a real religious guy, but it seems to me that that kind of thinking screwed over 1/3 of the host of Heaven.

tl;dr -- That's bull ****, man. Every winner in this world failed a million times before the finally won.

You raise another tangential question in my mind. Is it right to allow someone to be baptized mere weeks after being introduced to the church at all? Are they being set up for success or failure. To your point, a lot depends on the ward, and is that enough to hinge the eternal salvation of another individual on just so we can up the church's official tally by 1 on any given Saturday? Would it be better to get them to associate with the church, attend a lot of meetings, maybe give them the year they normally have to be a member before attending the temple to attend meetings and decide if they want to commit to the church? I know some people can make that commitment from the get-go, but many cannot. Is that fair to the many?

I've already been far too long winded in this post, so I'll sum this one up: What's "fair" or "not fair" isn't really up to you, is it? I would think you would be elated that you were given the opportunity to show someone a different path; one that you both believed would change their lives for the better. It's up to them what they choose to do with that opportunity, not you.

I get that single wards are met so you can find "the one" but I believe there should be a little more to it. Also maybe if you gave these "ugly girls" a chance you might find out one of them is the one,

The best part about this whole thing is that there's a site called www.KnittingFanz.com and there are a bunch of girls from Thriller's ward on there. One of them was bored in RS today and made a thread about how tragically ugly the men in the ward were, especially that HOG that is a school teacher.

However, since you seem to believe the point of going is to check out hotties like its a club, you might try digging a little deeper.

That is one thing I never understood about singles wards; it's a glorified meat market. I think I attended one or two in my early days to see a friend leave or come back from a mission, and even then I felt awkward being there; almost like God was looking down going, "You gotta be kidding me, right?"

meh maybe I'll just stick this one through, try to make the best of this lottery bound ward, and then bail once the school year ends to take my talents to South Beach Orem...

Seriously though, meh, I'll try to make the best of this situation. It's bad news bears though. The ward makes some of those Brazilian wards with 600 members baptized and 45 members active I saw on my mission look like they're close knit and well organized...

At least Jazzfanz didn't fail to destroy my boredom. Nor did it fail in enlightening me and giving me pause in my reasoning. I'm reflecting upon stuff today and we'll see if reevaluation is necessary. I'm just in "meh" when it comes to church stuff these days. NFL is so much more entertaining. And walking outside and cruising up and down Provo Canyon is so beautiful.

Doesn't matter if you stay or go, the ward will be what you make of it, for the most part. One thing in life that is tried and true, and very rarely wrong, is the old saying about the grass not being greener on the other side.




All that being said, I was in bigb's ward for two years or so and I have never wanted to blow my brains out more in my life. Hate is a strong word, but it doesn't even come close to describing my feelings toward that ward. He can confirm, as he's still there. Of course, he's not half the *** hole that I am, so maybe he won't.


Great thread, Thriller. Would read again.
 
My wife and I had this discussion because it involved her brother at the time. He was not raised in the church and after her mission she taught him along with the missionaries in the area and he got baptized (aged 15 at the time). Then he went completely inactive because their mom was married to someone in the military and they moved a lot and neither her mother nor her husband at the time (the marital relationships in that family are way too complicated to explain in a simple post, even a babe-sized post) cared at all about the church, so he had no impetus to go. Now many years later he doesn't even acknowledge that he was baptized and it means nothing to him at all. He is a great guy, one of the better people I know, and I think a better person than a lot of people I see on Sundays at church. So if he didn't have that covenant of baptism hanging over him would he be better off in terms off eternal salvation?

So we have discussed the question of whether she did him a favor, or set him up for damnation, by introducing the church to him and helping him find his way to baptism. We are to be judged based on our knowledge, at least partly, and how well we held to those covenants we have entered into, at least the way I understand it, so my take is that it is better to not know the church than to join or enter into covenants if you are not going to go at it full-steam ahead. I think partially active is worse than totally non-active status, to put it another way. I have no idea if that is right, and am very open to other ideas on the topic. But it seems to me you are better off just dropping the whole thing rather than half-assing it and piling judgement on top of judgement, so to speak.

Here's my take on it: my guess is he probably didn't "know the church is true". I don't think most people have that strong testimony after only a couple discussions and to church. Of course there are some that do, but at that point in time, it was likely only some nice thing that felt good and his sister was really into (and she's awesome, so it probably is too).
The covenant thing brings another aspect into the scenario, but if a person doesn't fully understand or believe the covenant their entering, can they really be held accountable for that? I believe in a God who is merciful and understanding about all of that.
But take it for what it's worth as I'm far from Peter Priesthood.
 
It's like an REM song had intercourse with an Alanis Morissette song and the offspring was this thread.
 
It's like an REM song had intercourse with an Alanis Morissette song and the offspring was this thread.

Couldn't happen. Both the same gender, regardless of what gender they identify with.
 
Back
Top