Official Trades that are Official Thread

[green]

I think Kanter will be dangled out there with picks to move up in this draft.

 

[Doublea]

DL said he will evaluate players based on their ability to play defense. Clearly, Kanter can not defend his position (1-22) and it will be a while before he can. I wouldn't be surprised if Kanter is moved in the off season.

I hate this stat/argument. The whole team went 1-14 at the first of the season, which was when Kanter mostly started. We were without 3 of our top 8 players due to injury. We also had the worst PG rotation in the league. This just inflates the 1-22. Plus when ever Kanter does start we lack the depth at the 4 and 5 spots. We haven't even seen a fully healthy team with Kanter starting.

 

[fishonjazz]

I would hope any number cruncher the Jazz hire would be bright enough to see that this season Kanter has only started when we were without an important part of our team (Burke, evans, marvin early, Favors lately).

Fixed

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I hate this stat/argument. The whole team went 1-14 at the first of the season, which was when Kanter mostly started. We were without 3 of our top 8 players due to injury. We also had the worst PG rotation in the league. This just inflates the 1-22. Plus when ever Kanter does start we lack the depth at the 4 and 5 spots. We haven't even seen a fully healthy team with Kanter starting.

Dude, Kanter has been the main problem in losses. Last night, he allowed a lot of points, specifically to Blatche. If Favors is in there instead of Kanter, I think we easily win.

 

[Doublea]

Dude, Kanter has been the main problem in losses. Last night, he allowed a lot of points, specifically to Blatche. If Favors is in there instead of Kanter, I think we easily win.

Give stats if you want to make a point. I don't know how many points "a lot of points" are. Are you forgetting that when Kanter starts we are very thin with who backs him up? We were also winning for most of the game. My main point was not last night, it was the 1-22 record your using as fact.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Give stats if you want to make a point. I don't know how many points "a lot of points" are. Are you forgetting that when Kanter starts we are very thin with who backs him up? We were also winning for most of the game. My main point was not last night, it was the 1-22 record your using as fact.

Yes, we are thin, but if we weren't, Kanter wouldn't be getting the minutes he was. Gobert isn't as good offensively, but his net effect might be teh same.

 

[mct]

Some stats for you:

Kanter has not started a single game this season for Indiana, OKC, Miami, or San Antonio. That's a combined 162-54. Conclusion: All a team has to do is NOT start Kanter to be a contender.

 

[Hekate]

Actually Gobert was pretty bad defensively as well.

 

[Doublea]

Some stats for you:

Kanter has not started a single game this season for Indiana, OKC, Miami, or San Antonio. That's a combined 162-54. Conclusion: All a team has to do is NOT start Kanter to be a contender.

Are those Corbins stats?

 

[fishonjazz]

Dude, Kanter has been the main problem in losses. Last night, he allowed a lot of points, specifically to Blatche. If Favors is in there instead of Kanter, I think we easily win.

If favors is in there AND kanter i think we win too

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

If favors is in there AND kanter i think we win too

Probably not because floor spacing would be messed up and Burks wouldn't be able to get free lanes as much. There would still be huge defensive issues because Kanter doesn't understand team defense.

 

[fishonjazz]

Probably not because floor spacing would be messed up and Burks wouldn't be able to get free lanes as much. There would still be huge defensive issues because Kanter doesn't understand team defense.

Maybe right.

Sure seems like the perfect season to find out