What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

those hoop summit measurements were dead on what Schroder was measured in at the Combine btw, so i tend to believe 6'9" in shoes is legit.

Brook Lopez shot under 50% both years in college and 53% as a rookie, not sure what that means but i just dont like using FG% as an indicator of things to come. Michael Beasley was 53% in college and never over 50% in the pro's

also theres a few guys logging decent minutes at C this year in the NBA who arent all that much bigger than Julius (Kris Humphries, Jared Sullinger, JJ Hickson)

Chuck Hayes predraft #'s were 6'5½" w/o shoes, 6'7¾" in shoes, 6'10 wingspan, 232 lbs and 8'8 standing reach and hes played almost 10 years now, mostly at C

i really dont think his size will be much of an issue tbh, if he didnt have great hands id be a bit more concerned
 
Randle is about a half to 3/4 inch taller than Poy. Just based on my eyeball test in person and from spending about 4 hours only a few feet from them.
Willie is a legit 7', imo.

(here come the jokes..)

Okay. According to DX, Carmelo, Millsap and Randle have the same standing reach, 8'9.5". Players like Lebron James, Patrick Patterson and Derrick Williams have slightly longer standing reach. It wouldn't surprise me if Randle measures about 6' 8.5" or 6' 8.75" in shoes. Will see. Alex Poythress is listing at 6'9".
 
Wingspan:

Blake Griffin 6'11.25
Kevin Love 6'11.25

Your point is?

This has been discussed before.

Griffin and Love, while having shorter than ideal wingspans for a post player, have elite skills.

Griffin is a great athlete for his position, and it shows in his game. Love is a great shooter, has great post moves, and uses fundamentals more than he uses his size.

They use those elite skills to make up for their lack of size. Exactly what elite skills does Julius Randle have that will make up for his lack of size?

So, exactly what was your point again?
 
those hoop summit measurements were dead on what Schroder was measured in at the Combine btw, so i tend to believe 6'9" in shoes is legit.

Brook Lopez shot under 50% both years in college and 53% as a rookie, not sure what that means but i just dont like using FG% as an indicator of things to come. Michael Beasley was 53% in college and never over 50% in the pro's

also theres a few guys logging decent minutes at C this year in the NBA who arent all that much bigger than Julius (Kris Humphries, Jared Sullinger, JJ Hickson)

Chuck Hayes predraft #'s were 6'5½" w/o shoes, 6'7¾" in shoes, 6'10 wingspan, 232 lbs and 8'8 standing reach and hes played almost 10 years now, mostly at C

i really dont think his size will be much of an issue tbh, if he didnt have great hands id be a bit more concerned

I don't think Randle will bust like Derrick Williams. Randle has much better motor, toughness and feel for the game. But I think their physical tools are going to look similar. Randle needs a mid-range jumper more than he needs right-hand post moves.

Anyone have stats on what Randle's percentages are on jumpers?
 
LOL!

Love the Gordon homers grasping at straws trying to diminish Randle's game. They ignore his FT shooting, zero offensive game, and tweenerness while focusing on randle's weaknesses.

Had Gordon led his team in scoring (16 pts) last game im sure we never would have heard the end of it.

True, he doesn't have Duncan's polished game with 4 years of college. He's a freshmen but apparently he should have a polished game according to some of his critics. So obviously Randle sucks. Obviously.

Dude is a beast. And he's still incredibly young. He kicks ***, something we desperately need on this team of softies.

I say draft Randle and use the second pick we have to draft Michigan's Peja Stojavich.

Next year start from day 1 favors and Randle. Have them work the P&R game and high low stuff. Stick Randle on the box and have him pass to cutters/beat down his man down low.

Have Peja, Burks, and Burke run the P&R. Have Peja bomb away from 3
 
LOL!

Love the Gordon homers grasping at straws trying to diminish Randle's game. True, Duncan after 4 years of college had a more polished offensive game. So obviously Randle sucks. Obviously.

Dude is a beast. And he's still incredibly young. He kicks ***, something we desperately need on this team of softies.

I say draft Randle and use the second pick we have to draft Michigan's Peja Stojavich.

You truly have the worst reading comprehension, and make the worst comparisons of anybody on this board.

The only thing Stauskas and Stojakovic have in common is that they're white and can shoot 3's.
 
LOL!

Love the Gordon homers grasping at straws trying to diminish Randle's game. They ignore his FT shooting, zero offensive game, and tweenerness while focusing on randle's weaknesses.

True, he doesn't have Duncan's polished game with 4 years of college. He's a freshmen but apparently he should have a polished game according to some of his critics. So obviously Randle sucks. Obviously.

Dude is a beast. And he's still incredibly young. He kicks ***, something we desperately need on this team of softies.

I say draft Randle and use the second pick we have to draft Michigan's Peja Stojavich.

Next year start from day 1 favors and Randle. Have them work the P&R game and high low stuff. Stick Randle on the box and have him pass to cutters/beat down his man down low.

Have Peja, Burks, and Burke run the P&R. Have Peja bomb away from 3


* Stojakovic

I'm not an Aaron Gordon homer, far from it. The Jazz have always made PFs look good in the pick-and-roll, and they could do the same with Randle. Randle will be better than Boozer given his quickness, his motor and the fact that he plays defense. For me personally, I just which he was a little longer, was a little more explosive vertically or had developed a jumper a bit more. He's going to need the jumper to be effective in the NBA. He can't just ram his way into the paint like he does in college.
 
The thing I like about Randle is worst case scenario he's a nice player. You can already see he would belong on an NBA court from day 1 if not be dominant. Safe pick but still high upside.
 
* Stojakovic

I'm not an Aaron Gordon homer, far from it. The Jazz have always made PFs look good in the pick-and-roll, and they could do the same with Randle. Randle will be better than Boozer given his quickness, his motor and the fact that he plays defense. For me personally, I just which he was a little longer, was a little more explosive vertically or had developed a jumper a bit more. He's going to need the jumper to be effective in the NBA. He can't just ram his way into the paint like he does in college.

He'll develop a jumper. Gordon can't shoot either and shoots a horrific percentage from the FT line.

At least Randle has a post game. He ain't no tweener. Gordon is more like a hyped up Hakeem Warrick.

Many on this board have had way too much Gordon Kool-aid. And I seriously LOL when I hear AK47 comparisons. As if that would be a good thing?! LOL! I remember all those games where defenders would complete forget about AK and help out on other players.

Do we really want that again?
 
You truly have the worst reading comprehension, and make the worst comparisons of anybody on this board.

The only thing Stauskas and Stojakovic have in common is that they're white and can shoot 3's.

LOL. Wah wah.

Randle belongs in the league. Worst case? He's a double double post player. Best case? He's one of the most dominate posts in the league.

Gordon can dunk real good but he doesn't have a role in he nba until he actually develops a game. Blake Griffin had about 30 lbs, a jumper, and a post game on Gordon.
 
its probably a loaded question and i don't mean it that way but

How does Nik Stauskas compare with the Alaskan Assassin, Trajan Langdon?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9MlIRow3MU
 
Back
Top