The idea that a bruise on an arm is going to negatively affect somebody's shooting is one of the more hilarious ideas that has posted here.
Just stupid.
No meaning.
He has played in a plethora of rotations. Including JLiii, Thomas, Tinsley, etc.
He's had a new role, young, lack of experience, ****ty coach and rotations, been jerked around, etc. Not sure you can place much meaning on stats this season.
If Kanter has a stat like that by the end of next year, then yes I will probably be worried.
If that bruise is painful or limits mobility then no it is not stupid. If this is in regartds to Kanter's bruise than I'd say it was a fairly large on ebut it didn't seem to hinder him so I'd discard it as a reason.
It's a freaking bruise on his bicep. I don't know if you've ever shot a basketball, but your bicep being sore doesn't do much to make your shooting worse.
Favors has the same challenges and you want to run him out of town. Just sayin. You are a Kanter apologist, nothing wrong with that other than your opinions are completely biased.
It's a freaking bruise on his bicep. I don't know if you've ever shot a basketball, but your bicep being sore doesn't do much to make your shooting worse.
It's a freaking bruise on his bicep. I don't know if you've ever shot a basketball, but your bicep being sore doesn't do much to make your shooting worse.
It's a freaking bruise on his bicep. I don't know if you've ever shot a basketball, but your bicep being sore doesn't do much to make your shooting worse.
Really? This is laughable. One of the very first muscles engaged in shooting is your bicep. How else does one go about elevating the ball before squaring their shoulders? GTFO!
Really? This is laughable. One of the very first muscles engaged in shooting is your bicep. How else does one go about elevating the ball before squaring their shoulders? GTFO!