What's new

Locker room trouble?

Who's Nate Duncan?

Follow the link. As for you doubters I totally believe this is true because

1- he has a web page
2- his web page says he is an insider
3- he tells us he was not actually Inside the locker room but just made a guess.


In other news I posted yesterday about Locke suggesting that there were some other internal issus bugging Hayward that had not made it to the media because Hayward is a good guy.
 
You forgot Evans.
And the high second pick can't be discounted either. That's certainly a chance to add some depth. Plus the Jazz are in position to add 1-2 solid FA's. They really don't have tax concerns until THIS year's draft class comes off their rookie deals. Well, I guess if Burke and Gobert were to explode, someone might have to go. But that's more than enough time to bring in some veteran help, likely a wing and one other, depending on how the draft goes. I agree; it should be an attractive opportunity for a coach. Still holding to my line that it will be Brad Jones.

Oh, and for the record, I have never ONCE called for Corbin to be fired this year. I challenge anyone to find a post that says otherwise.



May I ask why?
 
So, about that locker room rumor in the OP before Core4 turned this into his personal **** hole, anyone know anything following last night's game?
 
Just because some of us think Corbin has not demonstrated that he can be a winning coach and are advocating that he not be resigned does not necessarily mean that we have succumbed to groupthink, have hopped on the bandwagon, or are after Corbin with torches.

Sometimes, the evidence is so compelling, that it leads naturally to an informed consensus of opinion.

3.5 year into it, we have more than enough data points to reach an informed decision as to whether Corbin merits an extension.

I don't have blind hatred for Corbin, and I admit to not being aware of ALL the good things he does for his players. BUT, I can see plainly, and as the statistics indicate, Corbin has not changed the defensive culture and performance of this team (which the FO said at the beginning of the season would be the single most important thing he'd be evaluated on) and he is not able to get this team to play above its relative skill level on a consistent basis. The Jazz are playing worse at the end of the season than they were mid-way through it. The Jazz, in sum, are performing worse that the sum of their component parts. Corbin cannot escape the blame for this; he has not met the goals set for him at the beginning of the season by the FO; and he needs to be held accountable. I like the guy, and I feel for him, but he is not a top tier, or even a middle tier, NBA coach. It's time for him to go.

That's fine. If he is not resigned because our defense sucked and he was judged on the defense, I have no problems with that.
I also try to keep in mind that every year he has been given a poor situation to deal with as I look at all that has gone on and the results.

I do get tired of the constant fire Corbin crap.
I also disagree with the thought that he is not a middle tier coach. When we had Al and Sap we were around middle tier in the results, which would most likely indicate he was a middle of the pack coach. Not every coach gets an Eric Spoelstra situation. I've seen nothing that tells me he's an excellent coach, and yet he has coached a couple of title winning teams. I do think things have more to do with players than coaching.
 
And you think they quit because of what specifically? We knew the Jazz would suck this year, the Jazz knew they would suck this year.
Most of the games we lose because our bench sucks.

Our bench sucks...that same bench that has Burks and Kanter on it, right? Also, look at the players you can play:

PG - Burke, Garrett, Hayward, Burks. I don't think you say the bench sucks for the PG position
SG - Hayward, Burks. Maybe a little thin here
SF - Jefferson, Williams, Hayward. Bench doesn't suck for this position
PF - Favors, Williams, Kanter, Evans. Again, doesn't suck.
C - Favors, Kanter, Gobert. Maybe a little inexperienced, but I wouldn't say that our bench sucks here.

So, where exactly is this sucky bench? And remember, it isn't injuries either, because the Jazz were playing .500 ball when Burke came back from his injury. Then the team quit on Corbin. So, while the team does has it's limitations, Corbin shares a lion share of the blame. Kanter has been in this system three years now. Same with Burks. And Hayward. I bet Sloan and Johnson would have built a better offense around Kanter, Favors, Hayward and Burks the last couple of seasons. The defense has regressed. Kanter has regressed. Hayward has regressed. Gobert hasn't gotten any better. Burke has regressed from the middle of the season.

Against the Knicks we were in the game until Favors left the game with 4 mins left in the 3rd qtr, then they were down by around 10 when he came back. They lost by around 10.

I agree. Why was Ian Clark in there during that period? Why was Kanter left in there so long? Why hasn't he developed a defensive system that can hide Kanter, while taking advantage of Kanter's offense?

I'm not seeing this from your perspective obviously. I don't think they have quit. I see they are discouraged at times.
I also see this as something that can be solved by a player or two from the draft, and a free agent or two.... and a bench that does not suck.

As to Corbin staying or going, I'm right in the middle. I don't hate him and want him gone. I won't cry if he stays. I also hope the Jazz FO explores all other coaching candidates they can to get a coach that can handle teaching, motivating, x's and o's, defense, and offense.

People talk about thibs and his amazing defense, yes he has a good defensive team. His team sucks offensively and if in the Western Conference they would not make the playoffs. Even with a good scheme and good defense you still need good players and the ability to score. What he needs is to get Rose back at full strength, and someone to fill deng's role.

Boozer plays 29 minutes a game. Jefferson plays on one of the top defensive teams in the NBA. You don't think Favors has the talent to match Noah's defense? You don't think that Hayward and Burks and Burke have more talent than the players playing for Chicago? You don't think Kanter should be around Boozer's level three years in (18 pts, 9 rebs)?

What the Jazz need are good players who try all the time, and not just on one side of the ball, or part of the game. You can coach something all you want, if the players can't or don't do it it's not pretty. Is that the coaches fault or the players fault? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Look at Boozer, Al, Millsap, Korver, etc and the level of defense they are playing on different teams. All are much better now that they are out of Utah. Why would they care all of the sudden, as soon as they left Utah?

Also, whose job is it to put players in positions to succeed, so that they will want to try harder? Who is easier to get rid of? 5 young players all top 12 picks, or a coach? Which is the quicker fix?

There isn't a single reason to keep Corbin. He has done some things ok [like revive Jefferson's career, starting Marvin, Burks if FINALLY playing SG (it only took Corbin YEARS to do this)], but he has done a lot of things wrong [team defense, Hayward playing PG (what is Corbin's deal with putting non-PG players in at PG?), Kanter's devlopment, Burke's development, Hayward regressing, the record being abysmal, comparing him to what Horny has done in PHX, etc, etc, etc, four playoff games in three years, etc, etc, etc the team getting worse every year].
 
That's fine. If he is not resigned because our defense sucked and he was judged on the defense, I have no problems with that.
I also try to keep in mind that every year he has been given a poor situation to deal with as I look at all that has gone on and the results.

I do get tired of the constant fire Corbin crap.
I also disagree with the thought that he is not a middle tier coach. When we had Al and Sap we were around middle tier in the results, which would most likely indicate he was a middle of the pack coach. Not every coach gets an Eric Spoelstra situation. I've seen nothing that tells me he's an excellent coach, and yet he has coached a couple of title winning teams. I do think things have more to do with players than coaching.

He is a worse than middle tier coach. He took the team to the playoffs, we were swept. KOC then improved the roster, and we missed the playoffs. Corbin somehow took a playoff team, with an improved roster and made it worse.

And, I'm sick of hearing about how Lindsay set Corbin up to fail. Horny has less talent than Corbin. Look at where PHX is. Look at where Utah is. Heck, Boston, LA, Sacramento, Detroit and maybe even Cleveland all have less talent than Corbin has...
 
That's fine. If he is not resigned because our defense sucked and he was judged on the defense, I have no problems with that.
I also try to keep in mind that every year he has been given a poor situation to deal with as I look at all that has gone on and the results.

I do get tired of the constant fire Corbin crap.
I also disagree with the thought that he is not a middle tier coach. When we had Al and Sap we were around middle tier in the results, which would most likely indicate he was a middle of the pack coach. Not every coach gets an Eric Spoelstra situation. I've seen nothing that tells me he's an excellent coach, and yet he has coached a couple of title winning teams. I do think things have more to do with players than coaching.

Even if he has been given a poor situation, to me the primary questions is: Does the team performance exceed the sum of its parts? This is particularly important for teams with less talent. In 2011-2012 and 2012-13, he had a mediocre team, and it performed mediocre, even missing the playoffs in 2012-13. In 2013-14, he has a poor team, and it has performed poorly. There is no evidence that he can take a team and get it to play at a higher level than what its individual parts are. Given where they are, for the Jazz to succeed, that is exactly what they need. Corbin has shown conclusively that he is not capable of doing this. He's had 3.5 years to show it, and he has not.

Why is wanting to get rid of Corbin crap--if he's not doing the job? Isn't that a perfectly reasonable response? I want hi gone, and I don't consider it crap. I consider it an informed conclusion based now on going on 400 data points.

I can see how you'd get a bit weary of the constant fire Corbin drumbeat here, however. It can verge on a bit hysterical at times.
 
Back
Top