If you think that Kicky was "peaceable" I invite you to re-read his first two posts directed toward me in this thread. He was dismissive right from the start. How can we have any sort of meaningful exchange that way?
The first two posts from sirkickyass.
What is reverse racism?
Near as I can tell it's just regular racism, but somehow worse because it happens to white people.
The very idea that the culture is biased against white people in general, and that racism against whites is really a pressing social issue, is so ill-informed and beyond offensive that I can't take anyone seriously that makes this an issue of real concern.
I agree they are dismissive, however, they are not aggressive in any way, but rather, fairly calm and peaceable. You seem to think being dismissed on the issue is the same as being a victim of aggression. Do you think your opinions are so clearly correct that to dismiss them is to be aggressive in and of itself?
As for "meaningful conversation", a conversation that begins in a notion a reverse racism is no more meaningful that one that starts with a notion of a 6000-year-old earth or the earth being flat. These positions are wrong on all the objective evidence. You can have meaningful conversations about why they are wrong, but not if they are wrong.
I don't have a problem with you disagreeing with me. I simply want to understand and be understood. If you respect my right to have an opinion I will gladly return that respect. I am open to learning more than I know, and I never claimed to be an expert on racism.
Of course you have every right to an opinion. You don't have any right to have that opinion treated as being relevant, interesting, accurate, or viable. You have to earn those designations.
My initial intent posting in this thread was simply to comment on something I found to be bizarre, not to parade around any "white privilege". You ask me why I'm trying to defend something, but I'm not quite sure what you think I'm defending? Do you suppose that I am trying to defend being racist? If so, that was absolutely not my intent. I'm willing to discuss if I don't get piled on again.
First, I want to say that I completely believe you regarding your intent. I'm sure you had no intention of advertising your privilege, and I don't think you would ever try to defend being racist.
One thing to keep in mind is that privilege in this context (white privilege, male privilege, heterosexual privilege, able-bodied privilege, etc.) is different from superiority. White superiority is an active position that someone might defend; white privilege is a gift that you often don't realize you are being given. We (collectively) didn't ask for teachers to call on us more, give us more encouragement, and spend more time with us than with our black peers; but we responded to the attention, regardless. We don't ask policemen to search our cars less and give us fewer traffic tickets, but they do it anyhow. We are the beneficiaries of dozens of quick judgments of the course of every week, to the degree that on the few occasions when we don't get that benefit, it feels as if we are wronged.
Privilege is a cocoon; it was wrapped around you before you could walk, and it insulates you and protects you from threats you never perceive. People who lack one or more of your privileges don't get that protection. That's why the notion of reverse racism is so flawed; no matter how any individual treats you, they do not get protected by the same cocoon you have been sheltered by your whole life.