For real doe... It should probably be Randle

[Fishsticks]

Out of Smart, Randle, or Gordon, I am only excited about getting Randle. Getting another PG isn't exciting and I just don't see the hype with Gordon.

I like the fire Randle brings. He just seem like a guy who loves basketball and wants to go out and kill you. I wish we could get into the top 4 somehow but with what's left I want Randle. Vonleh is just too meh for me as well. Didn't stand out when I saw him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

my only issue is that he seems destined to be a 17 and 9 guy in the NBA and we already have two of those. A lot of analytics point to a two PG backcourt as the next big thing. I like the three guard rotation we would have with smart, burks and burke.

 

[The Midnight]

he is also under 20, so it is bizarre that people would assume he can't improve.

It's not that bizarre, this IS JazzFanz.

 

[franklin]

Before the year he was right there with Wiggins and Parker. What did he do that was so disappointing? His team underachieved, but he didn't. He walks into the NBA as a double double guy, and he's at least Zach Randolph.

I really hate to say something that KKKKKKKKKKK would say. But he really does want to win more than anyone else, and I think that's important. It'd be great to see him yelling at Hayward and Kanter to actually try.

Basically, It would be easier to teach Randle to defend than to teach Gordon how to score.

#RandleAt5
#SorryCy

****ing hell. How did I know someone would start a "let's darft Paul Millsap right after we let an all start walk because we're ****ing morans" thread?

**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** you dennis lind soy.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Both things that can be improved. I've heard people say he doesn't have much upside, but his biggest weaknesses, the suspect shot, the loose dribble, the lack of ability to go right, the court vision, defense - all those things can be improved. Because most of his issues are things that can be improved, that tells me he has a ton of upside.

Loose dribble? Court vision? Defense? Has there been a single player on our current roster who has improved significantly in any of these attributes? Lol let alone all three.

 

[franklin]

my only issue is that he seems destined to be a 17 and 9 guy in the NBA and we already have two of those. A lot of analytics point to a two PG backcourt as the next big thing. I like the three guard rotation we would have with smart, burks and burke.

Seems? ****! He has ****ing Cee Lo Queen arms for ****s sake. He's going to be a 17 and 9 guy without a doubt.

BTW, I didn't read this cake sheet eating thread or anything you were talking about. I'm off to find the Darft this stupid **** from Australia thread...

 

[seattlejazzfan]

Loose dribble? Court vision? Defense? Has there been a single player on our current roster who has improved significantly in any of these attributes? Lol let alone all three.

Hayward has improved in all three areas. Burks court vision and handle has improved.

 

[Deleted member 848]

I am not going to be upset with Smart, Exum, Randle or Gordon tbh. Just really wanted Parker or Wiggins.

them ships have sailed, boy. We aint sniffing Wiggins. Small, SMALL chance at Parker. Only if we trade up. No one will trade down from Wiggins.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Hayward has improved in all three areas.

significantly?? Might wanna read my post more carefully. Not really tbh

Burks court vision and handle has improved.

Alec's role has taken on a larger scope. If you watched him in college, he still does the same things that he's doing now.

Of our entire core, I'd say the only strong improvement I've seen is the court-vision of Alec Burks. Hayward has had good vision, a decent handle, and good defense since his rookie year. Kanter has regressed (lol) in certain areas, and Favors has had incremental improvements offensively.


Offense is a lot more improvable than any of the attributes you mentioned. I cannot remember the last 3/4 who came into the league with a weak handle, and it tremendously improved over time. Maybe Paul Millsap? Again, there's no point in drafting Julius Randle when we just let go of Paul Millsap. Vonleh or bust.

 

[[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]]

franklin owning this thread.

Please stay away from Randle. I have Gordon, Smart, and Vonleh ahead of him (no order).

 

[[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]]

Again, there's no point in drafting Julius Randle when we just let go of Paul Millsap.

this.

****, braughs, did you watch any of the ATL-Indy series? We should all be missing the hell out of Millsap.

Millsap + 10th pick > Julius Randle. Any day of the ****ing week.

 

[[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]]

LOL... Sup NAOS/Huge-Size... pretty sure that's you.

lolol

how many dudes on this board make fun of your brainless shtick? And you think it's me every time, eh? Should I be honored?

#MCW=Exum
#Randle4SF

 

[The Midnight]

lolol

how many dudes on this board make fun of your brainless shtick? And you think it's me every time, eh? Should I be honored?

#MCW=Exum
#Randle4SF

LOL.. that fact that you knew about the little convo I had with Willie on MCW=Exum tells me You=Willie.



Thanks for confirmation.