What's new

Is Enes Kanter or Alec Burks More Likely To Be Traded?

I don't think anyone is off limits, but I also don't see Burks and Kanter as value fetchers at this point. Both have had limited playing time compared to potential, that they have more value to us than someone else, IMO. Maybe I'm wrong. I just think our only value fetcher is Favors because he's more proven, plays D, and is signed to a great looking deal when you start to think about the salary cap increasing these next two years.

Hayward could move the needle for a lot of teams, but with FA being after the draft, a deal including him would be tricky.

Burke had a good rookie year compared to the other scrubs in his class, but has still left some serious questions unanswered, e.g., shooting, drawing fouls, pace, # of FGAs compared to FG % and ASTs.

Gobert hardly played. Showed great promise, but not enough to fetch his value. Given his minutes, you have to think that if another team wanted him like we do, he would've been drafted before the 27th pick.

My $.02
 
  • Like
Reactions: ema
I don't want to part with Burks at all. The only way I want to trade Kanter is if we draft Embiid or Vonleh, and even then I'd like to keep Kanter for insurance incase Embiid or Vonleh bust, it also allows us to bring them along slowly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Kanter could fetch the #16 and #19 if we took Boozer's contract back. That clears almost enough space for Chicago to sign Mello.

i'd have to consider this, it seems like something the Jazz would do and there's a chance the Jazz dont get any value back for Kanter so i dont mind getting rid of assets before they expire

boozer wouldent be a determining factor in the Jazz sinking or swimming next year, thats on Favors, Hayward, Trey mostly

with 16, 19, 23, and 35 the jazz would/should probably draft and stash 2 promising big's with those picks (Porzingis, Capela, Tavares or Bogdanovic...maybe Jokic but hes a reach at 35 IMO) and bring over whomever plays best next year to replace Booz and his painted on hair
 
I wanna see one more year of Kanter. Hopefully he has competent tutelage on the defensive end. Hopefully he has a much-improved perimeter defense in front of him. I don't feel like this is asking too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ema
that Chicago team would be really dangerous with a healthy Rose and front court of Noah, Melo, Gibson and Kanter...

I do want to see another year of Kanter though, I hope hes shows up in better shape

but in this draft that 16 pick could land something the Jazz could really use next year, maybe a Tyler Ennis or Stauskas, Boozer can give 20 minutes which softens the blow from losing Kanter, also Goberts minutes would benefit which i dont mind. plus i really like those draft and stash players I listed, also forgot to mention Damien Inglis
 
i forget her name i think its like 'Coco' something, she lives in England and has a hot accent from what i remember


ill investigate further in a bit
 
People, are you really discussing Kanter for picks in the teens? Oh, and it has Boozer. Why would we want him back? Kanter will play decent D once he learns it, Boozer never has, or will. Boozer doesn't want to. Kanter has never been coached to until last season, and there's a language barrier. Big difference.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];835469 said:
I wanna see one more year of Kanter. Hopefully he has competent tutelage on the defensive end. Hopefully he has a much-improved perimeter defense in front of him. I don't feel like this is asking too much.


This please this!
 
Kanter could fetch the #16 and #19 if we took Boozer's contract back. That clears almost enough space for Chicago to sign Mello.

Already been said, but this is just insanity on multiple levels. The only thing that would make this worse is if we could somehow work Cleveland into the mix and obtain CJ Miles.
 
Back
Top