What's new

Report: #5, Favors, Burks for Cavs' #1 pick

Yay or Nay?

  • Yay

    Votes: 68 56.7%
  • Nay

    Votes: 52 43.3%

  • Total voters
    120
So sick of these 'reports' and 'sources'. I will sig bet anybody that we move up no higher than #5.

Done. Of course, you don't post much, but it will be nice to see my custom sig on all of them. This is for 365 days, FYI.

Also, to all of you who thing Tomic is some sort of answer... I laugh in your face. That guy is worse than anyone on our current roster.
 
I'd rather keep Burks at 7M per than Hayward at 11M per.

Me too. This is a huge NO for me. I think it is way too much to give up. Seriously, I see next year with rent a vet all over again. I love the potential of Wiggins but is he that much better than Gordon. I rather keep Favors and Burks and draft Gordon. Jazz should be getting back another player besides Jack or another pick. I know most people are on board with this and I would be if it was just Favors and Burks and a future first or Favors and the fifth pick. :mad:
 
L-O-L @ ppl who would hesitate to include Burks. I don't believe for a second that this rumor is real unfortunately.


£¥£
 
Kanter cannot play PF. Can't do it. He couldn't guard anybody.

All of this talk of trading Favors got me thinking…the Jazz have obviously stated that they want Favors to be a 5, and Favors has stated that he wants to be a 4. Maybe the front office thinks that he'll leave when he gets the chance if he doesn't get to play the position he wants. Just a thought…probably not true, but just a thought.
 
Back
Top