What's new

Poll: Should the Jazz Match Hayward's $15.75 a year/4 year Contract?

Should They Match?


  • Total voters
    181
  • Poll closed .
Defining moment for DL - this decision can either make or break the franchise for the next 5 years.

I don't think he matches. You can't hold firm at 12/per in pre-season negotiations and then turn around and award Gordon another 10+ mil (over the life of the contract) after the so-so season he had where they basically turned over the keys to the entire team to him.

The only viable options are S&T or letting him go for nothing.

I do not think it is that drastic but it is important none the less. What may determine what DL does is what realistic options the Jazz currently have to replace him.
 
I've always liked Hayward, but to pay a guy almost 16 million a year this guy better be a clear #1 option on a team, and Hayward isn't. He's great for the team but there isn't a guy on our roster that is currently worth that much money
 
I've always known the majority of this message board's posters were clueless, but this poll proves it. If you voted 'nope', you haven't watched the Jazz and/or have no understanding of the climate of the NBA.

Hayward has improved each season he's been in the league. He's still young and physically developing (strength being the key to him taking the next step), and offers a pretty special skill-set on both ends for someone with his size/athleticism. The hope is that he fulfills the lofty expectations during this new contract.

It is rare the Jazz can lure max-level free agents (or even close to it), with the exception of Boozer but that was under old CBA.

The bottom line is that for the Jazz to get players of Hayward's caliber (or better), they will need to be drafted by us and retained (no matter the price).

I don't get how a fan base is so ready to see a 24 year old walk following a relatively intriguing start to a career under the worst NBA coach in the modern era (Corbin). It's not a coincidence that Hayward has been involved in the Team USA program either - basketball people drool over him.

Now that he's gonna get his money, regardless if it's in Utah or Charlotte, he has to prove he's worth it.
 
You hope. That is a lot to rest on the shoulders of an untested rookie drafted 23rd.

Pretty sure we can bring Jefferson back for 1 more year and ease Hood into it. I see Hood as a Danny Green type player for us in 1-2 years time.
 
If the Jazz do match, which I think they will, it'll be the first time that Lindsey has made a move that is so much opposed by jazzfanz. Interesting to consider. (Maybe this poll is a sign that the Jazz won't really match.)
 
Everyone's shooting % are wildly better with Hayward on the court too.

This. I think for the most part, Hayward's ability to make people better on the court and how he can effect a game without even scoring are areas that most Jazz fans pay zero attention to when assessing his value. Most fans simply recycle the shooting percentage argument, which makes sense because there is a large amount of idiots in this fan base.
 
If the Jazz do match, which I think they will, it'll be the first time that Lindsey has made a move that is so much opposed by jazzfanz. Interesting to consider. (Maybe this poll is a sign that the Jazz won't really match.)

I cannot believe the percentage of opposition in matching around here! But you make a good point - if he does get matched, the honeymoon with DL may be over with some fans. I will be very upset if DL lets Hayward walk.
 
Exum's passing ability is going to pick up the slack if Hayward is no longer there. Hayward's passing isn't elite by any stretch of the imagination.

Perhaps not elite but certainly good. He passes the ball very well.

Pretty sure we can bring Jefferson back for 1 more year and ease Hood into it. I see Hood as a Danny Green type player for us in 1-2 years time.

Jefferson is not a repalcement for Hayward lol. I'd rather bring Williams back. If this is the case then embrace Tank 2.0.
 
Back
Top