What's new

I am fully on board with Exum starting at PG

Should he start?

  • Yes he should start at PG

    Votes: 19 24.7%
  • No he should not start and come off the bench

    Votes: 49 63.6%
  • He should start at SG

    Votes: 9 11.7%

  • Total voters
    77
Depending on how things look, I would think we would need more minutes out of Burks and Favors. If Hayward can play 36, then Burks and Favors can/should also be closer to 36.
Not sure who to take the minutes from but it would depend on who is not contributing.

/2cents

It's just a framework splitting each position into 30 and 18 minutes. I could see giving Burks more mins but I wouldn't want them to put that many miles on Favors body. 30 min for 82 games is already a lot for a guy Favors size.
 
gotta play Exum with Hayward and Burke with Burks.

Burke 30/ Exum 18
Burks 30/ Hayward 18
Hayward 18/ Hood 20 / Novak 10
Kanter 30/ Booker 18
Favors 30/ Gobert 18

I like the gist of what you are saying, but there is no chance that Novak gets only 10 minutes per game when Snyder wants to spread the floor.
 
I like the gist of what you are saying, but there is no chance that Novak gets only 10 minutes per game when Snyder wants to spread the floor.

Unless Hood is also shooting 40% from 3 and playing defense better than a cardboard cutout.
 
Unless Hood is also shooting 40% from 3 and playing defense better than a cardboard cutout.

This

The Jazz have set up their roster so that they can knock anyone down 10 mins that doesn't play D and add 10 for whoever does. Offensively the Jazz are pretty flexible this year. If guys want to play they will have to play D. The guys most at risk of losing mins are Kanter and Burke.
 
This

The Jazz have set up their roster so that they can knock anyone down 10 mins that doesn't play D and add 10 for whoever does. Offensively the Jazz are pretty flexible this year. If guys want to play they will have to play D. The guys most at risk of losing mins are Kanter and Burke.

I think it is more than 50/50 that Kanter gets traded in the next year partially for this reason.
 
Back
Top