What's new
By:

All-Time NBA Draft **Finals**: Spycam1 vs Hotttnickkk

Who would win in a 7 game series?

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .
Hack said:
Not fair?

So dumb.


It was Payton , Barkley, and Rodman

For Stockton and Malone.


It wasn't all that unfair. Certainly shouldn't have been vetoed.

I didn't know trades had to be perfectly equal. What's even the point of trading if that's the case? It's not like me and white chocolate were conspiring to help me win it. He wanted to do the trade and a bunch of you had to talk him out of it.

Sure, the trade made my team better, but that shouldn't be a reason to veto the trade.

It was BS is what it was.


Trades shouldn't be allowed, or vetoing shouldn't be allowed. All it did was open the door to jealous people to hate on other people.
Click to expand...

Well as I understand it White Choc also had a change of heart at the end.. so the vetoing is kind of a moot point when it's all said and done?
 
Hotttnickkk said:
From memory your team has too many inexperienced players in the starting lineup who haven't really proved themselves. Paul George? What has he achieved? He had 1-2 decent seasons, but that's really about it. He would be a good pick in a current draft game, but definitely not for the All Time draft.


Same goes with Anthony Davis. He may be talented now and has very good years ahead of him but he is still unproven and hasn't achieved anything yet.
Click to expand...

That's such bs ******** and you know it. Davis and George are considered the best players leaders and the franchise of their teams, and Davis is considered a top two or three pf in the league. Are there even considered better two way players not named LBJ in the league then those two??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thee jazz fan said:
That's such bs ******** and you know it. Davis and George are considered the best players leaders and the franchise of their teams, and Davis is considered a top two or three pf in the league. Are there even considered better two way players not named LBJ in the league then those two??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well they are really good players in "Current Draft" but not really in "All Time Draft" in my opinion...
 
Hack said:
Not fair?

So dumb.


It was Payton , Barkley, and Rodman

For Stockton and Malone.


It wasn't all that unfair. Certainly shouldn't have been vetoed.

I didn't know trades had to be perfectly equal. What's even the point of trading if that's the case? It's not like me and white chocolate were conspiring to help me win it. He wanted to do the trade and a bunch of you had to talk him out of it.

Sure, the trade made my team better, but that shouldn't be a reason to veto the trade.

It was BS is what it was.


Trades shouldn't be allowed, or vetoing shouldn't be allowed. All it did was open the door to jealous people to hate on other people.
Click to expand...

Hack,

I apologize for vetoing the trade. I really do. I, in fact, thought the trade was fair. But too many participants thought it wasn't and I did what I thought it was in the tourney's best interests.

Hope you're not pissed with me.
 
There are very few players in this draft that were better defenders than both Davis and George both could shoot, and scored over 20 a game. How the hell do they not compare?? And Davis was a 20/10 guy last year and the top shot blocker per game last year, Both would have been very tough to handle with their athleticism and length they belonged!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thee jazz fan said:
There are very few players in this draft that were better defenders than both Davis and George both could shoot, and scored over 20 a game. How the hell do they not compare?? And Davis was a 20/10 guy last year and the top shot blocker per game last year, Both would have been very tough to handle with their athleticism and length they belonged!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

They do lack experience....
 
It wasn't about who had the most hof's or MVP's it was who could put the best team together with players that fit well. It's not a nostalgia thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
They may lack experience of some of those retired guys, but they are legit. It's not like I drafted Burks or Favors, who are talented, but completely unproven. George and Davis are stars in this league and good enough to hold their own


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thee jazz fan said:
They may lack experience of some of those retired guys, but they are legit. It's not like I drafted Burks or Favors, who are talented, but completely unproven. George and Davis are stars in this league and good enough to hold their own


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well you had George, Davis, Nash and Durant in your starting Lineup.


Combined Finals Appearance = 1.


NBA Championship = 0.
 
So!! That doesn't matter! Had I drafted Stockton and Malone instead of Davis and George it wouldn't have made a difference? Or say Barkley?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Not really sure I feel like pwr rankings all the teams, but KKK easily had a top 3 team and Spy had a bottom 3 team. Not sure how Spy even won because I feel his team matches up poorly against KKK's.
 
Also, in a scenario when there are this many good players on the court, doesn't that make it more appealing to do "Hack a Shaq"? You would have to think offensive efficiency would sky-rocket with all this talent, so teams would want to foul Shaq because Shaq shooting a FT is way less efficient than that team actually operating offense (more so than usual since there are so many good offensive players).
 
Don't like the pairing of Dirk/Shaq at all from a defensive standpoint. Biggest problem with Spy's team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top