What's new

GOP blocking funding for Cannabis legalization in Washington DC

Revolution 9

Well-Known Member
Contributor
I guess your votes don't matter. I understand you may disagree with it, but this is the will of the people.


WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) conceded on Tuesday that Democrats probably won't be able to stop Republicans from blocking marijuana legalization in the District of Columbia.

"I'm opposed to what the House is trying to do. If they put it in there, it's going to be hard to take it out over here," Reid said, referring to parallel House and Senate versions of a spending bill. "But I oppose it."

Sources told The Huffington Post earlier on Tuesday that congressional lawmakers have struck a deal that would allow the nation's capital to keep its marijuana decriminalization policy in place, while barring D.C. from using funds to enact the legalization. The agreement would effectively defy the will of the almost 70 percent of D.C. voters who passed Initiative 71 in November. The initiative legalizes the possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use while keeping sales illegal.

The D.C. pot law would be targeted under an omnibus spending bill to fund the government, which House Republicans expect to release Tuesday evening. Marijuana legalization advocates said they were outraged that Democrats did not appear to be doing as much as they could to prevent Congress from interfering with the initiative, especially after voters had already spoken.

One senior aide on Capitol Hill pushed back against the notion that the provision would actually prevent legalization from going into effect. The aide said it would instead bar the D.C. Council from passing any new laws to legalize and tax sales of the drug, which is precisely the kind of bill D.C. Mayor-elect Muriel Bowser (D) has said she would like legislators to pass soon.

Reid said there were several items tucked into the House GOP's spending plan that he was not prepared to accept, citing "extremist factions" in the party that want to chip away at health care, women's rights and environmental policy.
 
Since those people were also voted into their current positions, I suppose whether votes matter or not depends on your perspective on the issue.
 
Just have the mayor to tell the cops to stop enforcing the law. It's how we roll now in the Newnited States.
 
Republicans are the biggest scumbags on the planet (the elected officials...while I don't understand why anyone would be an affiliated Republican, or a Democrat for that matter, the regular run of the mill GOP voter is just like anyone else I guess), except for a select few. For a party that goes on and on about smaller government, they sure don't mind nixing that whole philosophy when something goes against their dumbass moral code.
 
Since those people were also voted into their current positions, I suppose whether votes matter or not depends on your perspective on the issue.

They weren't voted by the people of DC. It's a shame that some clown from Kentucky gets to run how their city works. Even the Founders didn't see that sort of idiocy coming.
 
Just have the mayor to tell the cops to stop enforcing the law. It's how we roll now in the Newnited States.

I hope they do. Let Congress enforce their own laws that go against the wishes of 70% of the voters.
 
Just want to mention that I have proof to put Harry Reid in jail for a LONG time.. but no one fn cares.
United States of pansies and passivity.
 
Since those people were also voted into their current positions, I suppose whether votes matter or not depends on your perspective on the issue.

You either respect the democratic process, or you don't. For your example to make sense, the people would have to vote in a politician, only to have some power abusing D-bag to decide his opinion matters more than the majority, and decide the outcome of the election himself. You are correct in that anyone who thinks this way needs to find their way the hell out of politics, and it's up to the voters to help make sure the door doesn't hit them in the ***.
 
You either respect the democratic process, or you don't. For your example to make sense, the people would have to vote in a politician, only to have some power abusing D-bag to decide his opinion matters more than the majority, and decide the outcome of the election himself. You are correct in that anyone who thinks this way needs to find their way the hell out of politics, and it's up to the voters to help make sure the door doesn't hit them in the ***.

I agree with the second part of your post (and it was the point I was trying to get across), but I don't think the first is consistent with the spirit on which the country was founded. The Founders elected for a republic instead of a democracy specifically to prevent the will of majority from dictating laws. When I studied the process with which the Constitution was drafted, avoiding "the tyranny of the majority" was a major philosophical consideration. The majority simply decide which candidate best represents their views and/or interests, and they entrust that the representative will do his or her job.
 
They weren't voted by the people of DC. It's a shame that some clown from Kentucky gets to run how their city works. Even the Founders didn't see that sort of idiocy coming.

You make a good point. Representatives from KC have no business running DC.
 
Just want to mention that I have proof to put Harry Reid in jail for a LONG time.. but no one fn cares.
United States of pansies and passivity.

Nobody cares? Not even jagoffs like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck? Give it to them...then see if people care what they have to say.
 
Nobody cares? Not even jagoffs like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck? Give it to them...then see if people care what they have to say.

I hate what we have become. I am anti conspiracy theorism.. but there is some truly awful things happening with elected people of service. The fact you (seemingly), among most others (seemingly), choose to view it as merely partisanship is both abhorable and enabling and fueling our own overall demise as a country.
 
Back
Top