true, but i also want hill to play more than 1/3rd of the time.
So, play timid D and don't push anything?
No thanks. Play exactly as you are Hill.
true, but i also want hill to play more than 1/3rd of the time.
No just don't put your face 3 inches from a 7 footer clearing the lane. A healthy 90%-defensive-effort hill is better than hill playing 35 games this season.So, play timid D and don't push anything?
No thanks. Play exactly as you are Hill.
No just don't put your face 3 inches from a 7 footer clearing the lane. A healthy 90%-defensive-effort hill is better than hill playing 35 games this season.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
I hope Hill comes back as strong on D as before. Hill was fine.
sure, so do i. but he can make conscious decisions to try to avoid injury, which includes knowing when to back off a bit.. he is on pace to play 28 games (34% of 82 games) this season, and is arguably our most important player offensively, and 2nd most important defensively. he needs to play first and foremost, because his aggressive d is a moot point if he's not on the floor.
I see what you're saying but he is the Hill we need because of how he plays. Changing that to be less aggressive won't help Utah.
ok i guess we truly disagree then, because even a less defensively aggressive hill is a serious upgrade over mack, exum, and neto. his stability, poise, and threat offensively do wonders for this team. i'd rather have a less aggressive yet healthy and engaged hill for 60 games, rather than an aggressive, beat up and battered hill for 30 games.
I wish we had someone who's like 6'10" commenting on this elbow. I think there's a biased one-sided (short persons) perspective being applied here.
not 6'10" but i did play F/C in HS and was always taught to have your elbows up and pivot through. If they catch your elbow, they shouldn't be crowding you so much. Its stepping through your pivot with your hands tight on the ball, elbows up. It is not, violently swinging your elbows, your strength coming from your core.
Agree here... Hill should have been more cautious... Len wasn't trying to be dirty but was likely trying to make contact... don't think he was trying to hurt anyone. I wish we had earl watson still playing though because you do want to step up and let the guy know that ain't cool... it's reckless but not malicious imo.
Stockton and Malone were dirty players. Elbows, kicks, nasty/mean checks, tugging, pushing, body checking...
I'm not anti Stockton or Malone. Hell, Stockton is my all time favorite player. But let's be honest, they played dirty.
Lebron would be great in any era.No, not dirty. They were taught as was I, that you swing elbows to clear space. Stick an elbow out to strengthen a screen. You play tough, and rightly so, you expect the same in return. Today's NBA has has taught players that if you get touched it is a foul, if not a dirty play. I would love to see James or Harden play in the 80's or even early 90's. How do you think James would handle Barkly, Mahorn or Malone?
No, not dirty, just tough. The Jazz could use some.
No, not dirty. They were taught as was I, that you swing elbows to clear space. Stick an elbow out to strengthen a screen. You play tough, and rightly so, you expect the same in return. Today's NBA has has taught players that if you get touched it is a foul, if not a dirty play. I would love to see James or Harden play in the 80's or even early 90's. How do you think James would handle Barkly, Mahorn or Malone?
No, not dirty, just tough. The Jazz could use some.
I guess I need to watch some old NBA games. I just don't remember it being so much more physical than today. If so, why are there more injuries now than in those days? Stockton and Malone were known for their physical play and of course, the Bad Boys, but I don't see it as any worse than today. Supposedly, they have the hand check rule in force now. I say supposedly because they never call it. Players are constantly pushing off, both offensive and defensive, and they hardly ever call it unless someone is shooting, and then it's only the defense because offensive players often get away with clearing space with their arms.
I agree that Lebron would be fine, so would Westbrooke actually. Guys like Harden, Curry, Draymond Green and most of the players in the league would have a lot of problems in the 80'sLebron would be great in any era.
You think he couldn't adapt his game to be more physical? Silly goose
Back then you could use your arms to hand check, you could hit guys in the head without it being a flagrant foul. You could use arm bars against post players, and elbows to set screens. Right now the league is getting soft on holding and pushing off, but that's nothing compared to the 80's.I guess I need to watch some old NBA games. I just don't remember it being so much more physical than today. If so, why are there more injuries now than in those days? Stockton and Malone were known for their physical play and of course, the Bad Boys, but I don't see it as any worse than today. Supposedly, they have the hand check rule in force now. I say supposedly because they never call it. Players are constantly pushing off, both offensive and defensive, and they hardly ever call it unless someone is shooting, and then it's only the defense because offensive players often get away with clearing space with their arms.
I guess I need to watch some old NBA games. I just don't remember it being so much more physical than today. If so, why are there more injuries now than in those days? Stockton and Malone were known for their physical play and of course, the Bad Boys, but I don't see it as any worse than today. Supposedly, they have the hand check rule in force now. I say supposedly because they never call it. Players are constantly pushing off, both offensive and defensive, and they hardly ever call it unless someone is shooting, and then it's only the defense because offensive players often get away with clearing space with their arms.
Hill will play tonight.
https://www.nba.com/jazz/news/george-hill-injury-update
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk