What's new
By:
Filters

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

Douchebag K said:
Surely the Democrats can somehow get Hillary to stfu ??

Is she trying to get Trump re-elected ??
Click to expand...
Sounds to me like she is trying to keep foreign countries from being involved in our elections.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Having closely followed the 2016 election, I know that it was the Dems who rigged the primaries to get Hillary the nomination. At the same time, the Republicans engaged in their own shenanigans in a cross-check scheme that purged minority voters (likely Dems) from the voting roles.

However, to cover up their corruption, mainstream Dems like Hillary have continually blamed the Russians for her loss, suggesting that Progressives like Jill Stein and now Tulsi are tools of the Russians. This is more Dem disinformation to sidetrack the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party. This is total bs. It was none other than Seth Rich a fellow Democrat who provided Wikileaks with the embarrassing info about Hillary's campaign and the fraud perpetrated by the DNC -- yes, I know that people have tried to debunk this, even using comments from his parents, but I believe Julian Assange. This fraud can actually be traced by examining the voting results of the various primaries. I wrote an article about it with some of the details. It includes links to some very incriminating videos (if they are still posted).

 
Fellow Spaniards of mine with opposing general political views follow US politics closely (I might have had something to do with it). One thing they have in common, they love Tulsi.
 
Jazzta said:
All this talk about a “bottom 3 candidate” sure makes me giddy. There must be something about her...
Click to expand...
It's an attack on all Progressive candidates, i.e., Bernie and Warren, though some might question Warren's progressive credentials as she is more moderate than Bernie.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
It's an attack on all Progressive candidates, i.e., Bernie and Warren, though some might question Warren's progressive credentials as she is more moderate than Bernie.
Click to expand...

You know what’s funny (and I might get slammed for this), I find the current progressive candidates, regardless of “progressiveness”, to be more patriotic than the rest of the DNC, in terms of making decisions that benefit the american people.
 
Jazzta said:
You know what’s funny (and I might get slammed for this), I find the current progressive candidates, regardless of “progressiveness”, to be more patriotic than the rest of the DNC, in terms of making decisions that benefit the american people.
Click to expand...
That is because they are ... the DNC does not represent the interests of the American people nor the ideals of American democracy.
 
The only way the DNC can/will beat Trump is through policy, not by attacking his persona. A narcissist like him thrives in this scenario.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
Having closely followed the 2016 election, I know that it was the Dems who rigged the primaries to get Hillary the nomination. At the same time, the Republicans engaged in their own shenanigans in a cross-check scheme that purged minority voters (likely Dems) from the voting roles.

However, to cover up their corruption, mainstream Dems like Hillary have continually blamed the Russians for her loss, suggesting that Progressives like Jill Stein and now Tulsi are tools of the Russians. This is more Dem disinformation to sidetrack the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party. This is total bs. It was none other than Seth Rich a fellow Democrat who provided Wikileaks with the embarrassing info about Hillary's campaign and the fraud perpetrated by the DNC -- yes, I know that people have tried to debunk this, even using comments from his parents, but I believe Julian Assange. This fraud can actually be traced by examining the voting results of the various primaries. I wrote an article about it with some of the details. It includes links to some very incriminating videos (if they are still posted).

Click to expand...



Read the Mueller Report section about Seth Rich
 
The lady that 100% factually rigged the election

The lady who's staff whitewashed hard drives and smashed cell phones

The lady who sent classified emails over her own server

The lady who lied and said Benghazi was caused by a video tape


.
 
Muellar was serving the Deep State, which the DNC also serves. If you'll note, the Muellar Report stopped short of incriminating Trump enough to initiate Impeachment proceedings. I don't trust it. But I do trust Assange. He's not sacrificing himself because of a lie.

And of course, the establishment has labeled Assange a Russian asset.

It's all disinformation. And Rich wasn't the only one the Deep State knocked off. Let's be realistic, the Clintons and Obama are part or at least servants of the Deep State, as were the Bushes. How do you think someone like Bush the younger became President? W was a "good" guy, much more palatable than the current jerk, but he was a puppet for Deep Staters Cheney and Rumsfeld who called the shots. Can I describe the Deep State? No, but it is a network of powerbrokers, but decentralized and thus hard to delineate. It seems the Trump or Koch wing is also at war with it, forming a kind of secondary Deep State. That's why elements of the military and intelligence communities seem a bit confused right now.
 
Last edited:
sirkickyass said:
As the board's foremost Russia watcher:

Tulsi is a Russian agent.
Click to expand...

LMAO

Dude, go apply to work for the CIA or something. You must really know a lot about Russia studying it on you couch reading propagandized left leaning "news" articles.
 
NPC D4617 said:
LMAO

Dude, go apply to work for the CIA or something. You must really know a lot about Russia studying it on you couch reading propagandized left leaning "news" articles.
Click to expand...
Left leaning news would never report Tulsi as a Russian agent. Leftists oppose all autocratic rulers like Putin, and Trump. Contrary to what some conservatives on here think, rulers like Trump, Putin, Clinton, Obama, and the Bushes have common interests -- financial gain for the Deep State.
 
Jazzta said:
All this talk about a “bottom 3 candidate” sure makes me giddy. There must be something about her...
Click to expand...

She’s consistently in the bottom 3 polling between 0-2 percent because she’s not popular among democrats. Not enough to win the nomination but she can use her platform and candidacy to hurt Democrats and re-elect Trump. Pulling **** like this probably isn’t going to help her popularity among Democrats:





And... that makes you giddy?
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
Left leaning news would never report Tulsi as a Russian agent. Leftists oppose all autocratic rulers like Putin, and Trump. Contrary to what some conservatives on here think, rulers like Trump, Putin, Clinton, Obama, and the Bushes have common interests -- financial gain for the Deep State.
Click to expand...
If this were true they wouldn't talk Trump/Russia 24/7, 365.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top