We’re getting pie faced on Last Dance
- Thread starter D Will Texas
- Start date
toddychurch
Well-Known Member
My mom always said it takes one to know one.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
I think there would have been a title in '94 had Spencer not been injured.
Handlogten's Heros
Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
2020-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
It was fun as hell and really sucked me in. Good times. I wouldn’t call it a revelatory but it was a fun to get MJs perspective.
One thing I took away was I loved Reggie Miller as a player so much. He was entertaining as hell... so many big moments... I hate him as a broadcaster so much that it really took away from how I felt about him... remembered why I liked him so much.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
The Last Dance features very cool footage BUT IMO as a Documentary it quite clearly fails to tell a complete story. Didn't he have a wife and 3 kids? Where are they in the documentary? what was life like at home when he was chasing the championships??
They talk about his dad, gambling, his shoes...
But like it's sorta presented like he only existed to play basketball.. Like after the games he'd go to a cave and hang upside down til it was time for the next days practice...
They talk about his dad, gambling, his shoes...
But like it's sorta presented like he only existed to play basketball.. Like after the games he'd go to a cave and hang upside down til it was time for the next days practice...
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
The last dance also just has this stink of catering to its audience in a way that i find taints it a bit... just has this processed feel to it
fargon_sneaky_bastage
Well-Known Member
Mute the sound and watch this Game 6 Movie on ESPN right now. So cool watching prime John and Karl in HD.
Sent from my SM-N975U using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my SM-N975U using JazzFanz mobile app
Sean
Well-Known Member
JimLes
Well-Known Member
I've been watching some games from around this time and was thinking how crazy it is that it took Stockton and Malone as long as it did to become contenders. They were drafted onto a team that was already decent enough. The Jazz actually drafted Malone after just having been to the WCSF. Combination of crappy luck and bad front office decisions meant that after what looked like a breakout season in '88, the Jazz found themselves stuck in Western conference mediocrity for close to a decade.
Two events really screwed with everything. First was the Griff getting hurt. He was never a great player, but he was a competent shooting guard with high athleticism and a decent outside shot. He was never the same after that foot injury and missing an entire season. If he hadn't gotten hurt, he would've been a huge upgrade on Bob Hansen. My goodness, Bob Hansen was actually a starting PG for the Jazz for 4 seasons! That includes those 1988 playoffs, where he actually played okay, but he was nowhere near the player Griff was before his injury. Worst case scenario, if Griff didn't get hurt, by 1988 he could've been traded for someone better than Hansen.
The other disaster was the Dantley trade. Yes, I know Dantley had to be traded for a variety of reasons, the key one surely being the development of Malone. I get that there's not really a realistic scenario where the Jazz would be starting AD at small forward in the 1988 playoffs. The disaster here is the trade itself. Sometimes, the stereotypes really do ring true. The Jazz love their unathletic white guys. Tripucka and Benson were a terrible return for a player of AD's stature. Remember this is a guy who was still regularly getting a smattering of MVP votes at this time. There had to have been a better trade available for a man who just averaged 30 points a game on a playoff team with good efficiency. If the Mavs were willing to trade Aguirre for him 2 and a half later, surely the Jazz could've pulled the same trade in 1986. Or gotten a good SG. Maybe Aguirre's teammate Blackman. Anyone but Tripucka and Benson.
Stockton, Malone, Bailey, and Eaton were a decent core for the time being. I know that Eaton would break down in a couple of years, but I think you add just one more good player to that core and they beat the Lakers in 1988. After that, I think they'd have had a decent chance against both the Mavs and the Pistons. Of course, Pistons might not make it to the Finals if AD is traded elsewhere, and if he's traded to Dallas like I suggest, then the Mavs might be better than the Jazz at this point.
Still, it hurts to think what might have been. It's the only time in Jazz history that a player of that caliber was being traded away in his prime, disgruntled as he might have been. Even by standards of "we were forced to trade a superstar," the return was ****ing terrible. A goy Jerry Seinfeld-lookalike and Kareem's punching bag. This might just be the biggest what if in Jazz history.
toddychurch
Well-Known Member
Great take and that trade still hurts to this day. Seems like a franchise changer. 30 ppg and that’s what we get?
FabioJazz
Well-Known Member
I agree with you. But actually we won the game 6 of the 98 finals. We score more points than Bulls. Those two bad calls changed the game.
I think it was not Malone's fault. He was a monster in game 5, like you said. But he almost always played alone. Only one reliable scoring option helps opponent's defenses.
On the other hand, we confused the Bulls defense in that game because Antoine Carr was effective in mid range shooting. We could win. It hurts.
I watched this video, by the way. So many memories
A bit painful to watch especially for those of us who followed the Jazz of the late 90s.
Takeaways:
1. Jazz was a one-man offense. Malone was criminally underrated those years and maybe even now. The second-best option was a one-legged Horny with <15ppg who was never athletic enough to begin with. This was a joke. Bulls were clearly more talented and younger.
2. Jazz management did squat to upgrade the team since that 1997 finals loss. Botched trades don't count. You need to get the job done. But LHM was a pennypincher and keeping the team "competetive" was the goal. When you get your asses handed to you in 97 and you come back with practically the same team in 98 against a team that is younger and has the GOAT, what do you expect? 99-2003 was even more terrible. Armen Gilliam, Quincy Lewis, Pete Chilcut..the list of scrubs is a long one. Malone deserves the biggest statue outside the arena.You take him out, Jazz are'nt even a playoff contender.
3.Bulls had all their stars aligned. Despite all that talent, they got right breaks at the right time, right calls(or no calls). It seems , despite Jordan's greatness and all that, luck was always smiling on them.
4. Despite Malone's perceived saltiness and refusal to appear in this TV show, the fact that he went on that Chicago bus to congratulate them after game 6/1998, showed his class. He was probably the most heartbroken player on that team.
5. We may never see another guy like John Stockton again, the complete package he was.I hope I am wrong.
6. Coach Sloan was the man. A lot of the supporting case, when they left Utah, they just withered. It shows how Sloan and his system had maximized their potential. Russel, Eisley were borderline scrubs. We may never see another one like him again.
7. Byron Russel was a dumbass. If he had not shot his mouth off and pissed off Jordan, that may have been his greatest contribution to Jazz. His mouth always played a much better game than what he did on-court. Jordan had analyzed his weaknesses threadbare and exposed them repeatedly in 97 and then in 98.
Takeaways:
1. Jazz was a one-man offense. Malone was criminally underrated those years and maybe even now. The second-best option was a one-legged Horny with <15ppg who was never athletic enough to begin with. This was a joke. Bulls were clearly more talented and younger.
2. Jazz management did squat to upgrade the team since that 1997 finals loss. Botched trades don't count. You need to get the job done. But LHM was a pennypincher and keeping the team "competetive" was the goal. When you get your asses handed to you in 97 and you come back with practically the same team in 98 against a team that is younger and has the GOAT, what do you expect? 99-2003 was even more terrible. Armen Gilliam, Quincy Lewis, Pete Chilcut..the list of scrubs is a long one. Malone deserves the biggest statue outside the arena.You take him out, Jazz are'nt even a playoff contender.
3.Bulls had all their stars aligned. Despite all that talent, they got right breaks at the right time, right calls(or no calls). It seems , despite Jordan's greatness and all that, luck was always smiling on them.
4. Despite Malone's perceived saltiness and refusal to appear in this TV show, the fact that he went on that Chicago bus to congratulate them after game 6/1998, showed his class. He was probably the most heartbroken player on that team.
5. We may never see another guy like John Stockton again, the complete package he was.I hope I am wrong.
6. Coach Sloan was the man. A lot of the supporting case, when they left Utah, they just withered. It shows how Sloan and his system had maximized their potential. Russel, Eisley were borderline scrubs. We may never see another one like him again.
7. Byron Russel was a dumbass. If he had not shot his mouth off and pissed off Jordan, that may have been his greatest contribution to Jazz. His mouth always played a much better game than what he did on-court. Jordan had analyzed his weaknesses threadbare and exposed them repeatedly in 97 and then in 98.
JimLes
Well-Known Member
I for one, fully support him. This isn't a documentary, it's an old-fashioned hagiography. It may as well be a narrative film with actors. I cut the cord long ago and thankfully don't see any commercials, so I'll be damned if I'm going to watch an 8-hour one for Michael Jordan's shoes.
Sean
Well-Known Member
Chicago definitely had more talent dispersed on the court than the Jazz did in 1998. The Jazz' second-best player (offensively) was Jeff Hornacek and he would have likely been Chicago's fourth-best and only a marginally better upgrade than someone like Steve Kerr. Stockton was likely overall a better player than anyone else on the Bulls' roster outside Jordan and Pippen, but offensively, beyond his creating shots for (mostly) Malone, he struggled consistently scoring.
Plus, Jordan was Jordan. I said it before, and I will stand by it, as great as Malone was, he didn't have the ability to consistently take over a game on the level Jordan did. Game Six is the best example of this. Malone had a very good game - hell, a great game - but Jordan had an even better one. Jordan made the plays to win the Bulls that title. Malone, sadly, turned it over when he could have likely put the Jazz up three - and it was Jordan who made the steal, and then the shot, to win it. That's not to knock Malone. He carried the Jazz and you could make the claim that his carrying 'em for so long is exactly why he faded, at times, in the NBA playoffs. But the Jazz DID miss that clutch performance - either from Malone hitting his free throws in game one of the 1997 NBA Finals, to holding on and making shots to win game five of that series ... to not botching the inbound in game six that allowed the Bulls to seal the win.
That's the big stomach punch. Those series, outside maybe a handful of games, were close as **** - especially the '97 NBA Finals. Most every one of those games came down to the final minute. Only once in 1997 did the Jazz make the clutch plays in a game that was getting away from 'em (game four). Game three that year was one the Jazz controlled for most of it. But on the Bulls' side, you had Jordan's game-winner in game one (had Malone made his free throws, it only ties the game and sends it to OT). You had the Jazz going completely cold at the end of game five (the flu game - imagine history if the Jazz didn't blow it and give MJ one of the greatest performances ever). Thinking back to that game five, the Jazz led 85-83 with 2:25 left and Malone at the line, already making one free throw. He missed the second. Pippen was then fouled and only made one of two. After a missed shot on a rebound from that missed free throw, the Jazz had the lead and the ball with 1:24 left in the game. Stockton then took a three - and missed. Russell rebounded and the Jazz AGAIN had the ball, now worked the game clock down to about a minute before Malone missed a two-point shot and Pippen rebounded.
With 46 seconds left in the game, Jordan was fouled by Stockton and only managed one of two free throws. This is where the game collapses for the Jazz and it really goes back to my point about Jordan making the plays.
Jordan gets the rebound on his owned missed free throw and then, about 20 seconds later, hits a three to put the Bulls up three with 25 seconds left. Ostertag scores a quick two and the Bulls push their lead back to three with six seconds left.
Horny puts up a three, but misses. Stockton rebounds with no time on the clock, but is fouled and, really, the game is over.
Jazz lose.
In that game, which would have changed the trajectory of the entire series, Stockton had a chance to put the Jazz up four with 1:24 left to go ... but he misses.
Malone then has a chance to put the Jazz up three with 1:04 left ... but he misses.
And, tied, the Jazz fail to secure a rebound on a missed Jordan free throw, which allows for Jordan to hit his monster three to put the Bulls up for good.
Of course, Horny's three at the end to tie fails to drop.
Jazz drop game five and look all but done heading back to Chicago.
Credit Utah for playing tough in game six. I don't think anyone thought the Bulls would lose that one. The Jazz actually led at the half 44-37. The Jazz actually led heading into the fourth quarter. With 7:55 left in the game, Karl Malone put the Jazz 76-74. It was the last time they led. It was also one of the last times Malone would score again. Malone's last score came with 3:14 to go - over four minutes of game time after his last score. Malone hit a 10 footer to get the Jazz within one.
With 1:44 to go, the Jazz actually got their last score - a Bryon Russell three to tie it. The game remained tied until Kerr's shot with five seconds left. Then, of course, Russell's failed inbound pass.
My point? Just looking at 1997, the Bulls hit the shots needed to put 'em ahead at the very end.
Jordan's buzzer beater in game one.
Jordan's three-pointer with 20 seconds left to put the Bulls up three.
Kerr's two-pointer with five seconds left to put the Bulls up two.
Those shots just weren't there for the Jazz, sans game four's late-game heroics.
And they weren't really there in 1998, either, sans Stockton's massive runner to put Utah up four in overtime.
The lack of overall clutch play killed the Jazz.
I agree. Don't forge Todd Fuller. The Jazz added him to the roster in 1999 and he was maybe one of the softest, weakest players to ever suit up in a Jazz uniform. You know, I am convinced he's a big reason why the Jazz didn't beat the Blazers in the semis that year. Dude was at the line with like four seconds left in game three against the Kings, and he couldn't hit the free throws. He missed both. The Jazz lose, then have to pull out all the stops in game four to even get it to a game five, which then goes to overtime and it absolutely zapped the Jazz. Utah wins game three and four against the Kings, they get some rest heading into the Blazers series and maybe they pull that out. Maybe they don't because those Blazers were more talented overall ... but yeesh. It was awful how often the Jazz would parade around these white stiffs or well past their prime players (like bringing back Thurl Bailey ... why?!?). The only move that I felt was solid in that era was when the Jazz brought in Donyell Marshall and even then, they got Calvin Booth'd in game five against Dallas.
Good teams get lucky - great teams take advantage of the luck.
The Bulls always took advantage of their luck. The Jazz never really could in those playoffs. I outlined a few sequences above but game five in 1997 is a great example of this.
How often does Pippen miss a free throw? In the '97 playoffs, he shot 80% from the line. Yet, with 2:25 to go in game five, and the Jazz up two, he does. Even still, the Bulls got the rebound on that missed free throw - but still couldn't score before Horny pulled it down. Utah had the ball, up one, and Stockton misses a three. LUCK roars, though, and the Jazz get the rebound. They milk the clock down to just a little over a minute ... and Malone misses a shot. Chicago rebounds and now Jordan's at the line.
How often does Jordan miss a free throw? In the '97 playoffs, he shot 83%. Yet, with 46 seconds left, after tying the game with the first, he MISSES the second. But the Jazz again fail to get rebound, and in fact Jordan gets his OWN damn rebound, and then eventually hits a three 20 or so seconds later.
Game.
You're right. The Bulls needed some luck. But the Jazz had a lot of luck, too. Like Malone being at the line at the end of game one. Or Pippen having horrible back pains in game six of the '98 Finals. But the Jazz just never could take advantage of those lucky situations. The Bulls did. Almost every time it seems. When they needed a shot, they got it. When they needed a stop, they got it. When they needed a turnover, they got it. I think that's the big difference right there and maybe it was a byproduct of the Bulls having been there so many times before. It just seemed, for the most part, the Jazz wilted under the lights of the big stage.
Last edited:
Not denying that the Jazz weren't clutch enough at the end. But the Bulls had championship experience, more bullets and the GOAT(and as a bonus- "Dick" Bavetta). Tough to beat that. For all that triangle or rectangle offense or whatever, at the end of these tight games the Bulls offense was just about giving the ball to MJ and clearing the way as Pippen mentions in the series. Iso plays, that's all. I didn't see any triangle out there.
I also believe the 10-day layoff before 98 finals threw the Jazz off their rhythm. You would think it would have helped those old legs, but it made them a bit rusty. It took them till game 5 to get their offense back. Stock and Horny were also not 100%, as MJ himself observed after that series got over. Of course they wouldn't let you know even if they weren't 100%
Sean
Well-Known Member
I said as much when I said their success could have been a byproduct of the Bulls having been there so many times.
It really makes you wonder how things would have turned out differently if the Jazz didn't blow game five against Houston in 1995.
Knock out the Rockets, then beat the Suns and Spurs to play an Orlando team in the NBA Finals that they likely matched up very well with.
That experience might've been enough to get 'em back to the NBA Finals a year later, even if they didn't beat the Bulls, and enough to actually win game one in 1997 - and maybe subsequently the series.
Just imagine a world where Utah beat Houston and...
Beat Orlando 4-1 to win the NBA title in 1995
Lost to Chicago 4-2 in the 1996 NBA Finals
Beat Chicago 4-2 in the 1997 NBA Finals
Beat Chicago 4-3 in the 1997 NBA Finals
Jazz would've been a dynasty at the end of the 90s.