What's new
By:
Filters

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Counting stats is your argument?

In 1985 Mike Mitchell and Kareem Abdul Jabbar averaged 22 points per game. Five year stretches are similarly arbitrary.

Advanced numbers show the two are no where near each other in how they achieved those numbers.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Counting stats is your argument?

In 1985 Mike Mitchell and Kareem Abdul Jabbar averaged 22 points per game. Five year stretches are similarly arbitrary.

Advanced numbers show the two are no where near each other in how they achieved those numbers.
Click to expand...
One season comparison? Cute.....

Please tell me these vast difference numbers.

Oh, and be sure to take into account that Curry got to play with Monta Ellis who averaged 24ppg when he played with Curry. And Curry got to play with Klay Thompson for 3 of his first five years. And Draymond Green. And Andre Iguodala.

Through their first 5 seasons, Curry and Donovan are very comparable.
 
LoPo said:
@LogGrad98

Now will you just shut up? This is what Steve said which is a lie.

I never dogged on Rudy because people were praising him. I dogged on Rudy because he was being given credit for everything good, and not being held responsible for anything bad.
Click to expand...
Another pathetic flailing.
 
EFG% for 1st 5 years:

Curry: 55.3%
Donovan: 51.2%

Curry's EFG% ever since his first 5 years is an absolutely bonkers 59.7%. The primary reason? He started taking more threes. A lot more threes.

Curry's 3PA per 36 minutes for his first 5 years: 4.7, 4.9, 6.0, 7.2, 7.8

Since then? 8.9, 11.8, 10.8, 11.1, 12.5, 12.7, 13.4, 12.2.

Does Mitchell have a similar jump in him? Sadly, probably not, because he's already been averaging 10.0 3 attempts per game the last two seasons, in which his EFG% jumped from a 50.4% average his 1st 3 years to 52.7% (His first three years he averaged 7.3 3 attempts per game). Curry had that potential to make a massive leap in EFG% because he was one of the best 3 pt shooters of all time not taking enough 3's in his 1st 5 years (a career 42.8% 3 pt shooter compared to Mitchell's 36.1%). Mitchell has already been taking a ton of 3's.
 
Last edited:
LoPo said:
One season comparison? Cute.....

Please tell me these vast difference numbers.

Oh, and be sure to take into account that Curry got to play with Monta Ellis who averaged 24ppg when he played with Curry. And Curry got to play with Klay Thompson for 3 of his first five years. And Draymond Green. And Andre Iguodala.

Through their first 5 seasons, Curry and Donovan are very comparable.
Click to expand...
Curry was a lot more efficient. despite dealing with injuries in his first five years, he was at about 60% TS while Donovan was at about 55% over that time. that is the difference between average and excellent - it's a huge difference. and again, Curry did that despite nagging ankle issues he couldn't shake - it was obvious that if he could ever maintain his health (i didn't think he would, tbh) he would explode and sure enough he did. you simply can't compare the two.
 
MT Steve said:
EFG% for 1st 5 years:

Curry: 52.6%
Donovan: 51.2%

Curry's EFG% ever since his first 5 years is an absolutely bonkers 59.7%. The primary reason? He started taking more threes. A lot more threes.

Curry's 3PA per 36 minutes for his first 5 years: 4.7, 4.9, 6.0, 7.2, 7.8

Since then? 8.9, 11.8, 10.8, 11.1, 12.5, 12.7, 13.4, 12.2.

Does Mitchell have a similar jump in him? Sadly, probably not, because he's already been averaging 10.0 3 attempts per game the last two seasons, in which his EFG% jumped from a 50.4% average his 1st 3 years to 52.7% (His first three years he averaged 7.3 3 attempts per game).
Click to expand...
curry had that jump in him because he was always injured/playing injured his first 5 seasons. donovan has been healthy - he doesn't have that jump in him. also, i don't know where you're getting a 52.6 eFG% for steph his first five seasons?

eFG% first five years:
53.5%
55.1%
58.3%
54.9%
56.6%

TS% is a better stat anyway, but yeah, 52.6% eFG for Steph isn't right.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
curry had that jump in him because he was always injured/playing injured his first 5 seasons. donovan has been healthy - he doesn't have that jump in him. also, i don't know where you're getting a 52.6 eFG% for steph his first five seasons?

eFG% first five years:
53.5%
55.1%
58.3%
54.9%
56.6%

TS% is a better stat anyway, but yeah, 52.6% eFG for Steph isn't right.
Click to expand...
Edited. I typed it in wrong - it was 55.3%.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
gotcha. it's a big difference - again especially considering curry was always injured and had that leap in him if he could get healthy.
Click to expand...
I think injury limited his availability but not his shooting %'s. His 3 pt %'s were actually even better his first 5 years.

He just didn't shoot anywhere close to as many 3's as he should've on a per possession basis. Once he did, it propelled him to one of the greatest players of all-time status. Mitchell's already been shooting a high volume of 3's (and obviously isn't in the same stratosphere as Curry in terms of 3%).
 
MT Steve said:
I think injury limited his availability but not his shooting %'s. His 3 pt %'s were actually even better his first 5 years.

He just didn't shoot anywhere close to as many 3's as he should've on a per possession basis. Once he did, it propelled him to one of the greatest players of all-time status. Mitchell's already been shooting a high volume of 3's.
Click to expand...
you just highlighted why TS% is a superior stat to eFG. what his injury limited was his athleticism - his TS% jumped so much once he got healthy because he was able to get to the line. his FT rate jumped by about 50% from his first four seasons to the rest of his career. you can't have a complete picture of offensive efficiency if you ignore a guy's ability to shoot and make FTs.
 
LoPo said:
One season comparison? Cute.....

Please tell me these vast difference numbers.

Oh, and be sure to take into account that Curry got to play with Monta Ellis who averaged 24ppg when he played with Curry. And Curry got to play with Klay Thompson for 3 of his first five years. And Draymond Green. And Andre Iguodala.

Through their first 5 seasons, Curry and Donovan are very comparable.
Click to expand...
That actually hurts your argument. Don, who is a great offensive weapon, probably isn’t scoring as much his first couple years if there were better offensive options on the team. Ellis took shots and opportunities away from Curry.
 
Holy **** - a couple percentage points better when he is surrounded by better offensive players.

You got me guys. Steph was on another planet his first 5 years. No comparison at all.

You lame asses will do anything to downgrade Donovan Mitchell. You just hate the guy. So pathetic for so called fans. You guys would rather lose on purpose than support Donovan Mitchell. You are disgraceful fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
LoPo said:
Holy **** - a couple percentage points better when he is surrounded by better offensive players.

You got me guys. Steph was on another planet his first 5 years. No comparison at all.

You lame asses will do anything to downgrade Donovan Mitchell. You just hate the guy. So pathetic for so called fans. You guys would rather lose on purpose than support Donovan Mitchell. You are disgraceful fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Saying Mitchell isn’t Curry isn’t hateful, spiteful, or downgrading him. It’s just stating the obvious.
 
RandyForRubio said:
That actually hurts your argument. Don, who is a great offensive weapon, probably isn’t scoring as much his first couple years if there were better offensive options on the team. Ellis took shots and opportunities away from Curry.
Click to expand...
Helps Curry's efficiency when he's not being the focus of attention.

Pick an argument guys. You can't take every angle.

Don has been the absolute focus of our opponent's defense for 4.5 years. What he has done, has been pretty legendary. But keep on bashing him lame *** fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
LoPo said:
Holy **** - a couple percentage points better when he is surrounded by better offensive players.
Click to expand...
I made a mistake. It's actually a big difference (55.3% to 51.2%).

LoPo said:
You got me guys. Steph was on another planet his first 5 years. No comparison at all.

You lame asses will do anything to downgrade Donovan Mitchell. You just hate the guy. So pathetic for so called fans. You guys would rather lose on purpose than support Donovan Mitchell. You are disgraceful fans.

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
I don't know if you're aware of how you come off when you do this. There's good points being made and instead of addressing them, you just throw a tantrum. It's childish as hell.
 
MT Steve said:
I made a mistake. It's actually a big difference (55.3% to 51.2%).


I don't know if you're aware of how you come off when you do this. There's good points being made and instead of addressing them, you just throw a tantrum. It's childish as hell.
Click to expand...
4%. Holy ****. 4%. Did that help him get to the playoffs every year?

Didn't think so....

Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top