What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

I truly hope we experience these high tariffs. I want Trump supporters to feel what they voted for! You wanted this crap! Enjoy!
Just as inflation is coming under control the people who voted for regime change based on inflation are whole heartedly in favor of guaranteed inflation inducing measures.

Let's undergo a massive effort to eliminate a huge chunk of low wage labor that we still do not have enough of. Why? Because I don't want the blood of the motherland to be tainted, that's why!

Let's specifically do a thing that increases the cost of goods (aka, inflation). Why? Because it'll be like were shoving our **** in the face of the world and spitting on them, because we need them to know that we can.
 
“thrill, you are such an elitist who has such disdain for the working class slob. Respect them!”

Me: Shrugs shoulders


View: https://x.com/billscher/status/1860730626816589881

IMG_0357.jpeg

View: https://x.com/USA_Polling/status/1856368890940432749


View: https://x.com/jwilcox79/status/1858541789637956094


You can’t maintain a top economy or democracy with a populace this lazy, bored, and willfully ignorant about just the basic facts about reality. So I truly hope Trump executes his economic plan and the American people, his voters in particular, feel it. They should be rewarded. That’s how democracy adjusts. Bad policy should be punished. Good policy should be rewarded.

Notice, none of the trolls will pump up his tariff war. Even they know this isn’t sound economics. But they will attack posters like me who demand that American voters feel the effects of their actions. I believe actions should have consequences.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know that I disagree with what you’re saying but I think terms like ‘right’ and ‘left’ don’t mean much. Cenk Uyger is an economic populist. I see his views having a significant overlap with your views. I think Cenk’s populist views are closer to Trump and Musk’s than they are to Kamala’s, but don’t believe that makes Cenk Uyger more right wing.

I am enjoying Cenk’s going after what you call the “center-right, establishment wing”. On David Pakman, he called them the “Loser Wing of the Democrat Party”. Too funny. Just remember the phrase the next time you bump heads with The Thriller. "Loser Wing of the Democrat Party"

Cenk and I have a lot in common. I don't know the guy personally, but I think we'd get along. Left and Right aren't meaningless but they may as well be since nobody seems to understand or agree on what is leftist and what is right.

I watched that whole David Pakman segment. The "loser wing of the democratic party" deserves everything that will, of course, never happen to them.
 
"Five years ago, we lost. All of us. We lost friends. We lost family. We lost a part of ourselves. Today, we have a chance to take it all back. You know your teams, you know your missions."
--Captain America

Trump's cabinet is filled with those who have been done dirty by the establishment. Tulsi Gabbard was Vice Chair of the DNC when she discovered Hillary was conspiring with Debbie Wasserman Schultz to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders, and she resigned rather than be party to corruption. Hillary's people floated the rumor that Tulsi was a Russian asset to pre-emptively discredit anything she might say, but emails exposing the corruption were posted to WikiLeaks causing Wasserman Schultz to resign in disgrace. It didn't matter that Tulsi was true to her morals and the American people. Hillary's smear stuck.

We have a billionaire genius who is a real life Tony Stark who was center-left politically. He has a company that makes rockets, which are covered by a series of export control laws restricting the sharing of information and technology to individuals of foreign nationality. To comply with those laws, SpaceX didn't consider individuals of foreign nationality for positions that required sharing of information and technology. The DOJ then sued him for complying with export control laws because to deny considering individuals of foreign nationality for positions is discrimination.

Right, center, and left, the one common thread seems to be first-hand understanding of the lengths the establishment will go to ruin the lives of those who oppose them.
 
Cenk and I have a lot in common. I don't know the guy personally, but I think we'd get along. Left and Right aren't meaningless but they may as well be since nobody seems to understand or agree on what is leftist and what is right.

I watched that whole David Pakman segment. The "loser wing of the democratic party" deserves everything that will, of course, never happen to them.
This is one of @Sardines favored content creators, but I think you'll appreciate it. Shoe is a populist-leftist who supported Bernie. She goes hard at the Loser Wing of the Democrat Party.

 
I want to play this game
Honest questions here:

Do you think expanding the Supreme Court is an extreme view or do you agree with it?\
No, Yes
Do you think deporting all illegals in America as an extreme view or do you agree with it?
Yes, No
Do you think getting rid of the filibuster is an extreme view or do you agree with it?
No, Yes
Do you think pardoning J6 prisoners is an extreme view or do you agree with it?
Not extreme, It depends on the case
Do you think getting rid of the electoral college is an extreme view or do you agree with it?
No, Yes
Do you think having a federal overwatch on speech is an extreme view or do you agree with it?
Yes, No
Do you think a mandatory gun buyback is an extreme view or do you agree with it?
Meh on both
Do you think getting rid of Federal Departments is an extreme view or do you agree with it?
Depends on the department and why we're getting rid of it
Do you think replacing the income tax with tariffs an extreme view or do you agree with it?
On its face: Yes, no
I can say I don’t agree with any of that (I don’t know about the tariffs Enough) and think it’s extreme views on both sides.
Tariffs have their place and can be utilized for good things. Untargeted blanket tariffs are just inflationary.
I would rather take what we have now and add Doge and clean Government up completely. Make it more transparent.
I'm all for increased government transparency. let's see what they do with it. I'll just say that I'm not optimistic about the intentions here.
 
This is one of @Sardines favored content creators, but I think you'll appreciate it. Shoe is a populist-leftist who supported Bernie. She goes hard at the Loser Wing of the Democrat Party.



Shoeonhead overlaps with me on certain things and there are things I don't like too. We could say that about anybody. Thanks for the Rec
 

Donald Trump had been the president-elect for just two days when he reportedly spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Nov. 7.

On the call, Trump advised the Russian president not to escalate the war with Ukraine and reminded him of the U.S.’s military presence in Europe, according to an account first published by The Washington Post, which cited multiple sources familiar with the conversation.

The Kremlin, however, denied that meeting had ever taken place. “Pure fiction,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov insisted.

Normally, the U.S. would be able to document that the call had happened. But not this time.
That's because the State Department, which traditionally helps coordinate phone calls between incoming presidents and world leaders, has been shut out of Trump’s calls with foreign dignitaries.

That means the conversations were not held over secure phone lines, no State Department staff were available to offer guidance on the nuances on foreign policy and no official interpreters were on hand to overcome language barriers that can sometimes lead to confusion or misunderstandings about exactly what was said.

For U.S. foreign policy analysts, Trump’s calls with Putin and other world leaders after his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris in the Nov. 5 election are cause for alarm.

“We’re entering a dangerous territory of telephone games, where Trump is going to have private chats with foreign leaders, and they're going to tell their teams one thing, and Trump is going to tell our national security team another,” said Brett Bruen, a former diplomat.

Different interpretations of private conversations stemming from translation difficulties or misunderstandings could not only sow confusion, Bruen said, but could trigger an international crisis.

trump doesn't want anyone involved in these calls because its much harder to do things like blackmail and bribe foreign leaders. A phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in 2019 deepened Trump’s distrust of government employees. During the call, Trump threatened to withhold U.S. aid to Ukraine unless Zelenskyy investigated then-former Vice President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. A summary of the conversation, made public by Trump's Justice Department and prepared by a government aide who had been permitted to listen to the call, helped lead to Trump’s first impeachment.

Trump’s remarks to Putin that he should not escalate the war with Ukraine raised eyebrows because federal law makes it a crime for an unauthorized American citizen to negotiate a dispute between the United States and a foreign government.

“There can only be one foreign policy at a time,” Bruen said. “What Trump is doing is saying you need to do X or Y, even though he hasn’t been sworn in, even though he doesn’t control U.S. foreign policy right now.”

Russia’s denial that the call ever took place also shows why it’s problematic for Trump to hold private conversations with foreign leaders without the involvement of the State Department, its official interpreters or other support staff, said Fried, who worked under Democratic and Republican administrations and is now a fellow at the Atlantic Council.

“Somebody’s not telling the truth,” he said. “If the Trump people had used the State Department, the Kremlin wouldn’t be able to get away with denying that the call took place, or at least there’d be no doubt.”

Fried said private calls with foreign dignitaries are not always held over secure phone lines because some leaders may not have such lines at their disposal. Still, phone conversations over unsecured lines are risky.

“Most of our adversaries are able to tap into these calls, which in and of itself is concerning because it means that the Russians are spying on the calls he’s having with Europe and the Middle East, and the Chinese are accessing the same ones,” Bruen said. “These are sensitive discussions. They allow countries’ leaders to understand where there may be potential compromises or vulnerabilities.”

When Zelenskyy called Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida to congratulate him on his victory, Trump handed the phone over to Elon Musk, the billionaire business titan who has become one his advisers and a ubiquitous presence at his side. Musk, a government contractor, has provided communications services to Ukraine through his Starlink satellite network during its war with Russia.

Musk also met on Nov. 11 with Iran's ambassador to the United States in an effort to help diffuse tensions between the two countries, according to multiple reports. Iran later denied that the meeting had taken place.

Allowing Musk to participate in a private call with Zelenskyy is alarming, Bruen said, because “Musk does not have a government role. He doesn’t have a security clearance. He does have a whole of lot of interest in the outcome of what is happening in Ukraine” because of his business interests there.

Worries about Trump’s phone calls with foreign leaders are compounded by questions of how he has handled classified documents in the past, Bruen said.

Trump suggested his Democratic opponent in the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton, should be jailed and disqualified from holding office amid questions about how she handled classified information. Seven years later, after he left office, a federal grand jury in Florida indicted Trump on 40 counts of mishandling classified documents, some of which were stored in a bathroom in Mar-a-Lago.

Given Trump’s past, his unsupervised phone calls with foreign leaders should set off alarms, Bruen said.

“It’s a hot mess,” he said.
 
You don't need to sell me on Trump. He already had my vote.
I agree. Calls between foreign leaders and POTUS do not need to be on secure lines. Let's just connect a 5-way calls with the Chinese, Iranians, Russians, and Syrians, because we know they are listening.

We're so effed with this bozo in charge.
 
I agree. Calls between foreign leaders and POTUS do not need to be on secure lines. Let's just connect a 5-way calls with the Chinese, Iranians, Russians, and Syrians, because we know they are listening.

We're so effed with this bozo in charge.
I can totally picture putin calling trump and saying "remember when we helped you out with your problems decades ago? (watch Active Measures) Well, now its time to pay up. Time to make America bleed" and trump is like "Dont worry, i will come through for you in the next 4 years. Just make sure there is a place for me at your table in Russia afterwards"

trump definitely wouldn't want a convo like that being heard by the US State Department.
 
I can totally picture putin calling trump and saying "remember when we helped you out with your problems decades ago? (watch Active Measures) Well, now its time to pay up. Time to make America bleed" and trump is like "Dont worry, i will come through for you in the next 4 years. Just make sure there is a place for me at your table in Russia afterwards"

trump definitely wouldn't want a convo like that being heard by the US State Department.
Tinfoil hats are coming out again. Crazy conspiracy theorists making **** up. Cuckoo birds.
 

When President-elect Donald Trump said Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would recommend major cuts to the federal government in his administration, many public employees knew that their jobs could be on the line.

Now they have a new fear: becoming the personal targets of the world’s richest man – and his legions of followers.

Musk reposted two X posts that revealed the names and titles of people holding four relatively obscure climate-related government positions. Each post has been viewed tens of millions of times, and the individuals named have been subjected to a barrage of negative attention. At least one of the four women named has deleted her social media accounts.

“These tactics are aimed at sowing terror and fear at federal employees,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 of the 2.3 million civilian federal employees. “It’s intended to make them fearful that they will become afraid to speak up.”

This isn’t new behavior for Musk, who has often singled out individuals who he claims have made mistakes or stand in his way. One former federal employee, previously targeted by Musk, said she experienced something very similar.

“It’s his way of intimidating people to either quit or also send a signal to all the other agencies that ‘you’re next’,” said Mary “Missy” Cummings, an engineering and computer science professor at George Mason University, who drew Musk’s ire because of her criticisms of Tesla when she was at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Musk has done this kind of thing before – and it’s led to real danger for the people named.

Missy Cummings angered Musk when she was appointed a senior advisor at the NHTSA because her research and public comments were critical of Tesla’s driver-assist programs and she had called for regulating the systems.

Musk targeted Cummings on what was then called Twitter, and his legions of fans followed.

In an interview, Cummings said she received a torrent of attacks, including death threats, and had to temporarily relocate before she eventually moved.

CNN reached out to multiple experts and academics who specialize in cyber harassment, doxing and online abuse. But several declined to comment on the record for fear of themselves becoming Musk’s targets.

“What has happened has an incredible and horrific chilling effect,” one of them said.

Another said they are “not surprised” with Musk’s re-posts, adding they are an example of a “classic pattern” of cyber harassment.
 

When President-elect Donald Trump said Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would recommend major cuts to the federal government in his administration, many public employees knew that their jobs could be on the line.

Now they have a new fear: becoming the personal targets of the world’s richest man – and his legions of followers.

Musk reposted two X posts that revealed the names and titles of people holding four relatively obscure climate-related government positions. Each post has been viewed tens of millions of times, and the individuals named have been subjected to a barrage of negative attention. At least one of the four women named has deleted her social media accounts.

“These tactics are aimed at sowing terror and fear at federal employees,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 of the 2.3 million civilian federal employees. “It’s intended to make them fearful that they will become afraid to speak up.”

This isn’t new behavior for Musk, who has often singled out individuals who he claims have made mistakes or stand in his way. One former federal employee, previously targeted by Musk, said she experienced something very similar.

“It’s his way of intimidating people to either quit or also send a signal to all the other agencies that ‘you’re next’,” said Mary “Missy” Cummings, an engineering and computer science professor at George Mason University, who drew Musk’s ire because of her criticisms of Tesla when she was at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Musk has done this kind of thing before – and it’s led to real danger for the people named.

Missy Cummings angered Musk when she was appointed a senior advisor at the NHTSA because her research and public comments were critical of Tesla’s driver-assist programs and she had called for regulating the systems.

Musk targeted Cummings on what was then called Twitter, and his legions of fans followed.

In an interview, Cummings said she received a torrent of attacks, including death threats, and had to temporarily relocate before she eventually moved.

CNN reached out to multiple experts and academics who specialize in cyber harassment, doxing and online abuse. But several declined to comment on the record for fear of themselves becoming Musk’s targets.

“What has happened has an incredible and horrific chilling effect,” one of them said.

Another said they are “not surprised” with Musk’s re-posts, adding they are an example of a “classic pattern” of cyber harassment.
And not thing one can be done about it. The propaganda minister is firmly in place.
 
Did you guys know that brainworm Kennedy's wife commited suicide after discovering his journal with detailed descriptions of his cheating encounters with 37 women? I did not know until recently. Makes me even more disgusted that somebody like Bucknutz was promoting that cheating, disgusting quack for a president. Yuck. Like multiple idiotic conspiracies he was spewing was not enough.
 
I can totally picture putin calling trump and saying "remember when we helped you out with your problems decades ago? (watch Active Measures) Well, now its time to pay up. Time to make America bleed" and trump is like "Dont worry, i will come through for you in the next 4 years. Just make sure there is a place for me at your table in Russia afterwards"
LOL. I do think it is funny that even if Trump owed such a debt that your believe he'd pay it. No one has confused Trump with the Lannisters.
 
Back
Top