FrenchJazzFa
Well-Known Member
Tough for Denver as they have many inconsistent players outside of Joker, Murray and Gordon. Westbrick, Porter being the superstar in this range.
He’s gonna look scared and weak if he asks out.Death, taxes, Donovan-led teams getting smacked in the conference semi’s.
Wonder if he punks out and asks for a trade this offseason or if he waits one more.
Actually after everyone went to the Locke room and the crowd was gone, Don came out and sat court-side in the empty stadium by himself.Death, taxes, Donovan-led teams getting smacked in the conference semi’s.
Wonder if he punks out and asks for a trade this offseason or if he waits one more.
Also, the Pacsrs.It’s unconventional, but the Knicks should be looked at as a decent example of how to build a team by adding talent, churning the roster and striking when opportunities arise.
Yep. They’ve drafted well, signed key free agents, made a couple of key trades, churned the roster and made a couple of coaching changes to get to this point.Also, the Pacsrs.
No one is calling for a rebuild for the Cavs, but Im sure there will be continuing talks about the fits of Mobley/Allen and Garland/Mitchell.Odds on how long before pundits, podcasters, blog boys, etc. begin the drumbeat for tearing down the Cavaliers and rebuilding (and Denver if they lose to OKC)? Further, what are the odds before a drumbeat begins for trading Jokic and getting what Denver can for him?
As if that's the only way to build a team and, at least in Cleveland's case, the lack of appetite among most fans for enduring yet another rebuild and the fact Jokic is a truly generational talent and trading him is even dumber than trading Doncic.
Yet, I'm guessing it won't stop the drumbeat from gaining momentum. How does that saying go, "if the only tool you have is a hammer...?"
Anything that makes them less effective over the long-term is great.No one is calling for a rebuild for the Cavs, but Im sure there will be continuing talks about the fits of Mobley/Allen and Garland/Mitchell.
No one is calling for a rebuild for the Cavs, but Im sure there will be continuing talks about the fits of Mobley/Allen and Garland/Mitchell.
Not yet. Just wait, a friendly gentlemen's bet that it's a matter of time. (I'm aware that I could be over my skis on this prediction.)No one is calling for a rebuild for the Cavs, but Im sure there will be continuing talks about the fits of Mobley/Allen and Garland/Mitchell.
It's not uncommon for teams to experience a few years of playoff flameouts before they break through, while tinkering around the edges, or otherwise keep a core in place. I guess the question is who's the "core" at Cleveland? I say Mitchell and Mobley definitely. Garland and Allen less so. We'll see.There is a sentiment in the cavs community that Mobley is being held back from his full potential by the ball dominant guards. That on top of Garland not being 100% during playoff time and the player fits not being seamless. It will be an interesting offseason for them. Should they just run it back?
I think they should run it backThere is a sentiment in the cavs community that Mobley is being held back from his full potential by the ball dominant guards. That on top of Garland not being 100% during playoff time and the player fits not being seamless. It will be an interesting offseason for them. Should they just run it back?
absolutely they will not. they need better role players and right now garland just isn't what they need. He will likely be shipped off for some role players. or, if don threatens to leave hell get fired away for role players. ironically, I wonder if they would trade don back for LauriI think they should run it back
Their problem is Mitchell.. plain and simple.. when he has the ball everyone just stands and watch. Other teams has that too except Mitchell cant hit the long shot consistently enough.absolutely they will not. they need better role players and right now garland just isn't what they need. He will likely be shipped off for some role players. or, if don threatens to leave hell get fired away for role players. ironically, I wonder if they would trade don back for Lauri
- George
Agreed. During lower stakes games, the offense flows and the ball is shared more. In crunch time or high stakes games, it always has been and will always be Mitchell time. We have sufficient data points to conclude that it's a load he can't shoulder successfully. That's why I don't think any team with him as the #1 option will ever win the title.Their problem is Mitchell.. plain and simple.. when he has the ball everyone just stands and watch. Other teams has that too except Mitchell cant hit the long shot consistently enough.
Compare that to the Pacers team where everybody’s involved.
Some good points by Perks about a Mitchell led team:Agreed. During lower stakes games, the offense flows and the ball is shared more. In crunch time or high stakes games, it always has been and will always be Mitchell time. We have sufficient data points to conclude that it's a load he can't shoulder successfully. That's why I don't think any team with him as the #1 option will ever win the title.