What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

Guys, when I'm wrong I'll admit it, and I was wrong!

Under Biden the world was in chaos. Fighting was breaking out everywhere. Wars and death and the spectre of nuclear destruction was in our faces every day.

Prices were going up up up.

Lawlessness in the U.S.A.. No one cared about justice. Guilty people were walking free.

The three independent co-equal branches of government were not being respected.

The justice department was being weaponized to target the opponents of the POTUS.

States rights were being trampled upon.

President Trump wins the election, takes office and immediately things are getting back on track.

The world has returned to peace. No one wants to step out of line and risk their historic bonds with the U.S. by engaging in aggression. No one is willing to engage in a nuclear showdown with Trump. Even other nuclear powers don't dare to use their nuclear arsenal as a bargaining chip when they know Trump is watching.

Prices are lower than they have ever been in my entire life.

The respect of law is peaking. Convictions matter and when people, even celebrities, even those who contribute to political candidates, even those with money know that if they are found guilty in a court of law they are going to do their time.

The American system, with three co-equal branches that share power and authority, is back to a place of balance and fairness. The establishment that has gotten us this far is no longer under attack.

The justice department is now an unbiased arbiter of law and order. No longer are people targeted due to their political affiliations, or allowed to flout the law because they enjoy the favor of the President.

States rights are respected and the federal government is no longer overstepping its bounds.

So I was wrong. I didn't know how good things were going to be once Trump took control.

The only thing that worries me is that 2028 is not going to be long enough. I think Trump needs at least one more term to really nail down all the gains we've made so far.
 
So Trump thinks it was good that Padilla was dragged out of the press conference because “he looks like an illegal”.



The administration replied:

"Michael Wolff is a lying sack of sh*t and has been proven to be a fraud," he said. "He routinely fabricates stories originating from his sick and warped imagination, only possible because he has a severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain."Clearly, Wolff has struck a nerve.
 
Last edited:
Um. We all see where this is going… right?
  • Large scale deportations (to ethnically cleanse America)
  • Smother protests
  • Unmarked vans disappearing people while the media isn’t looking

The question: How should the president respond? Many on the right may feel an instinctual reaction to “send in the troops.” While this concern for law and order is natural and merited, it must be pursued in a way that maximizes the chance for success and minimizes the chance for blowback. As the president considers his options, he might keep in mind a number of strategic points that, if implemented, will increase his leverage in the fight for large-scale deportations.

The administration must deny the Left a strong visual counterargument. It’s easy to see how scenes of militarization, abuse of demonstrators, or a violent death could reverse public sympathies and present the administration as abusing its authority. The language of politics is visual—and therefore emotional, which means that a single mistake can reverse the flow of opinion and imperil the president’s immigration agenda. Left-wing tacticians have trained their foot soldiers to bait law enforcement into confrontation and to play victim for the press, to great effect.

To prevent this scenario, Trump has a number of strategic options available to him. First, rather than sending in more troops to stop the fires, the president might be better advised to hold off. Right now, California governor Gavin Newsom has sided with the demonstrators, but if the riots spread further, this stance will cost him in public opinion, and eventually, he will have to assume the mantle of authority. The public will expect Newsom to restore order, and he’ll have to incur the risk of using force.

Second, the president should pressure local leaders to buy in to the task of quelling the riots. He could wait for Governor Newsom to request the National Guard or appear at a press conference with Los Angeles County officials, bringing state Democrats into the risk-reward calculus and creating the option for the president to shift the blame in the future if they fail to respond effectively. California Democrats are anticipating that Trump will assume all the authority and, therefore, relieve them of any responsibility. He should resist the temptation to be the only player on the field with skin in the game.

Third, the president should direct federal agencies to create a hard-soft, or visible-invisible, approach to riot control. In public, the National Guard should mobilize with enough manpower to smother the protests and avoid protracted conflict or hand-to-hand combat, which carries with it the highest level of risk. At the same time, as we saw demonstrated in Portland, Oregon, during the George Floyd riots, the agencies should dispatch unmarked vans to follow key agitators and snatch them from the streets while the media are not looking.
 
So I saw footage of Trump holding a rally at Fort Bragg, and it was a complete **** show, and was probably illegal. However he did announce the restoration of historical names for military bases across the US. Something I wholly agree with.
 
So I saw footage of Trump holding a rally at Fort Bragg, and it was a complete **** show, and was probably illegal. However he did announce the restoration of historical names for military bases across the US. Something I wholly agree with.
BTW the soldiers in the crowd at that rally were screened and vetted to make sure they agree with and love trump.
 
I thought I'd take a peek and watched the FOX stream on YT. The coverage, for the first hour at least, was a camera focused on Trump and Hegseth. That was it! That was the live footage of the parade. I could hear the announcer, but only an image of Trump. Maybe they were trying hard not to show the crowd?
Hesgeth was drunk
 
avecu · 2 hours ago
I'm glad you asked. Peaceful resistance in a Civil Resistance Movement serves to build membership, establish momentum and operational discipline. It is a beginning phase that can effect minor change such as swaying parts of the budget bill. Once participation reaches a critical mass the Movement has the power for further tactics such as a General Strike. The 50501 Movement begin Feb. 5 and grew to 3.5 million in the streets April 5. My estimate for today based on 2100 protests and a widening demographic is 8 million. That sets a new US one-day protest record and is closing in on our critical mass number."
 
But Trump said, "We'll be so safe... you never thought you could be so safe... we'll be so safe you'll get tired of being so safe... we'll be so safe even the sharks won't be electrocuted by boat batteries anymore... and all the leaves in California will be raked up in the forests... and we'll find Jimmy Hoffa and he'll be alive under MetLife Stadium.. Let's bring Jimmy Hoffa home... And then drill, baby drill!!! Let's talk about bacon... its the immigrants fault we have thinly sliced bacon!!! Man... woman... camera... TV... I'm the smartest person the world has ever known because I aced the same cognitive test Cocao the gorilla aced!!! Bigly winning!!! Cofefe... Someone got shot??? I like people who don't get shot, that I can tell you!!! And I know alot about not being shot because I faked an assassination attempt and had a retired firefighter killed instead of me... Oh well, you should have seen the crowd size... I bet you there were about 2 billion people there and they all loved me because I'm the fertilization president."

!
 
Back
Top