What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

If Donald Trump can end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours, he should be able to end crime altogether, in American cities, in about 12 hours, on a bad day……But, please don’t hold your breath. This is just my best guess….
He's working on it at least. TDS is strong with you.
 

'Ride this rocket into the ground': Conservative admits why he 'didn't see Trump coming'​

Story by Carl Gibson
• 23h•
2 min read
1755289660468.png

Donald Trump in Des Moines, Iowa on September 13, 2016 (Image: Shutterstock)

Donald Trump in Des Moines, Iowa on September 13, 2016 (Image: Shutterstock)© provided by AlterNet
In his latest column for The Bulwark — a conservative website opposed to President Donald Trump's administration — editor Jonathan V. Last acknowledged the conservative movement's role in making Trump's "authoritarian" second term possible, and admitted to his own bigge

Last opened his Thursday essay by sharing an email from a reader welcoming him to the anti-Trump effort, but reminding him that liberals, leftists and Democrats had been fighting the same fight longer than he had. The reader also posited that there was a "straight line" from former President Ronald Regan's brand of traditional conservatism to the far-right Trump administration.

He then shared a familiar argument from traditional conservatives, with one insisting that Democrats' intransigence on Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork (a failed Reagan appointee) paved the road to a more stridently conservative Republican Party, thus sowing the seeds for someone like Trump to rise to power. Last suggested that both arguments hold water, but then offered an observation of his own along with an ask of his fellow conservatives to consider an uncomfortable truth: The pervasiveness of racism in American society, and its influence on the conservative movement.


"I keep coming back to the African-American experience because it’s also central to understanding this moment," Last wrote. "African Americans have always understood America’s authoritarian shadow-self."

"Which is why I count my ignorance about the centrality of race in politics among my biggest analytical mistakes," he continued. "More than anything else, it’s why I didn’t see Trump coming."

However, Last didn't save all of his criticism for conservatives. He blamed "authoritarian-curious" voters on both sides of the political aisle for voting Trump into power the first time, noting that a significant portion of Americans on both the right and the left have long craved a strongman-type leader to bulldoze through institutions to accomplish their respective goals. He cited a recent piece from Nick Catoggio of The Dispatch (another conservative site founded by traditional Republicans opposed to the MAGA movement), who proposed that many Americans are well-aware of the country's descent into authoritarianism but won't do anything to stop it because they're, as commentator Andrew Sullivan said, "sick of this republic and no longer want to keep it if it means sharing power with those they despise."

"Americans will not be roused. All indications are that they’re going to ride this rocket into the ground," Catoggio wrote.




Related Articles:​

Supreme Court justice says Trump has conservative judges 'on speed dial' in brutal dissent

'You don't love your country': Conservative exposes 'moral rot at the core of Trumpism'

'Logic of bullies': Conservative details 'underlying philosophy driving Trump'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Actual freaking fascism.
Actually not….

AI Overview


Fascism, broadly defined, is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology marked by a dictatorial leader,
centralized autocracy, militarism, and forcible suppression of opposition, according to Wikipedia. While the specific proposals you've mentioned – ending the Electoral College, abolishing the Senate, and expanding the Supreme Court – are significant institutional changes with potentially far-reaching consequences for the American political system, it's a stretch to label them as inherently leading to fascism in the US.
Here's why and the arguments surrounding them:
  • Ending the Electoral College: This proposal aims to shift presidential elections to a national popular vote, which proponents argue would enhance democratic values by ensuring every vote carries equal weight regardless of location. Critics, however, might argue that it could diminish the influence of smaller states and exacerbate regional divides. While it represents a significant shift in the electoral system, it doesn't align with the defining characteristics of fascism like a dictatorial leader or suppression of opposition.
  • Abolishing the Senate: This would eliminate a key part of the US's bicameral legislature, leaving only the House of Representatives. Arguments for abolition often cite the Senate's unequal representation of states and its ability to obstruct legislation. Concerns about abolishing the Senate often revolve around the idea of checks and balances and the protection of minority rights. While it would significantly alter the legislative process and potentially reduce checks and balances, it doesn't necessarily lead to the other traits of fascism.
  • "Packing" the Supreme Court: This term refers to expanding the number of Supreme Court justices, which is within the power of Congress. Proponents might argue this could rebalance the Court's ideological composition or improve its efficiency. Critics raise concerns about eroding the Court's legitimacy and increasing politicization of the judiciary. While such a move could be seen as an attempt to exert influence over the judiciary, it's not a direct path to the complete suppression of opposition or a one-party state that characterizes fascism.
Key takeaways
  • These are significant institutional changes with a strong potential to shift the balance of power within the US government.
  • The concentration of power in one branch or a particular ideology is a concern for many when discussing the potential impact of these reforms.
  • However, these reforms are not inherently fascist. Fascism typically involves a more systematic suppression of dissent, a cult of personality around a leader, and often a focus on hyper-nationalism and militarism.
Ultimately, whether these changes would lead to fascism is a matter of debate and interpretation, depending on the specific circumstances and how such changes are implemented. The historical context and the political culture in which these changes are made are crucial factors in determining their potential impact on democratic norms and institutions.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
“Fascism, broadly defined, is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology marked by a dictatorial leader,
centralized autocracy, militarism, and forcible suppression of opposition, according to Wikipedia.”

Regarding: abolish the senate, eliminate the electoral college, pack the SC: “However, these reforms are not inherently fascist. Fascism typically involves a more systematic suppression of dissent, a cult of personality around a leader, and often a focus on hyper-nationalism and militarism”.(wow, now THAT sounds just like Trump!)

Notice how the above quote seems to match Trump’s approach to governing more than anything else we are presently experiencing. I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest Trump is a fascist…..
 
Last edited:
I'm not the only one who thinks the Democrats need to get off their asses and do something about Trump's dictatorship.

 
Last edited:
I'm not the only one who thinks the Democrats need to get off their asses and do something about Trump's dictatorship.

See if this works, it didn't attach my link.
 
So much projection with Trump and MAGA. It became very obvious, to many at least, but not his supporters, that nearly all of Trump’s accusations are really confessions. His accusations seem to turn out to be things he has done, is doing, or plans on doing. It’s so transparent, one has to wonder how anyone, including Trump, can fail to recognize it. What Trump and his followers call TDS is really just shock born directly out of “love of country”. If you think highly of the United States, appreciate this unique experiment brought forth in the 18th century, of course you will be horrified by the arrival of a fascist themed political movement. “It can’t happen here” starts sounding alarms in one’s mind and heart.

But, TDS, as described by MAGA, as an accusation MAGA loves to level, has always been simple projection. It’s the reason I sometimes picture the QAnon Shaman when I think of genuine TDS, the only TDS, in reality.

From an anonymous Facebook post:

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS): A psychological phenomenon characterized by an uncritical and unwavering devotion to Donald Trump, wherein an individual's perception of reality becomes distorted and filtered through the lens of Trump's statements, actions, and endorsements.

Symptoms may include:

Blind acceptance of information: A tendency to accept as true any statement or claim made by Trump, regardless of verifiable evidence or factual accuracy.

Rejection of contradictory evidence: A refusal to consider or acknowledge information that contradicts Trump's narrative, even when supported by credible sources or empirical evidence.

Hostility towards dissenting views: A strong negative reaction to opinions or criticisms that deviate from Trump's stated positions, often accompanied by personal attacks or accusations of disloyalty.

Lack of critical thinking: A diminished capacity for independent thought and analysis, resulting in an inability to evaluate information objectively or consider alternative perspectives.

Individuals afflicted with TDS may exhibit a pronounced inability to recognize or acknowledge flaws, inconsistencies, or wrongdoing attributed to Trump, and instead, often redirect criticism or scrutiny towards perceived enemies, opponents, or marginalized groups. As a result, their understanding of reality becomes increasingly detached from factual information and objective truth.

(Writer unknown)
 
Uh oh. Has Fox News gone woke?


A new American Immigration Council report shows that instead of taking aim at criminals and bad actors, the Trump administration is now targeting law-abiding immigrants, including many long-standing and valued members of our communities.

This isn’t what Americans expected, and it’s not what we want. A recent Gallup poll found that just 30% of us want less immigration, while a record-high 79% say immigration is good for the country. Even those who worry about border crossings have no desire to see our neighbors detained or harassed.
 
I know the left deserves this cuz woke and black and tranny sports and egg prices but this is unhinged. Further proof that there are no standards for republicans while there are impossible standards for Dems

IMG_6441.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
I know the left deserves this cuz woke and black and tranny sports and egg prices but this is unhinged. Further proof that there are no standards for republicans while there are impossible standards for Dems

View attachment 19242
My wife and I literally just mailed in our ballots about a week ago when we voted for Mayor of Kearns.
If we didn't get our mail in ballots then we wouldn't have even known there was an election and I have no idea where we could even go to vote.
This is about getting less voters.
 
Back
Top