What's new

Countdown to Trump using the military against Americans

  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Trump supporters probably just see this as Trump keeping it real or something. Trumptards are a cancer.


"President Donald Trump on Saturday posted an AI-generated video depicting him in a fighter jet dropping what appears to be feces on U.S. protesters.

The 19-second video features Trump wearing a crown in a fighter jet labeled “King Trump.” He posted the video to his Truth Social account following Saturday’s nationwide “No Kings” rallies that were organized in protest of Trump and his administration."





 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
No surprise here, that’s for sure. Pete Hegseth is now regarded as a total nut job by our military brass.





 
Last edited:
No surprise here, that’s for sure. Pete Hegseth is now regarded as a total nut job by our military brass.






If only we could have all seen this coming from a mile away. Like most of trumps picks, he was a horrible choice and it was obvious before he was ever confirmed to the position.
 

If there is one question everyone in America is trying to game out at this moment, it’s this one: Can the judiciary impose meaningful checks on President Donald Trump’s ability to deploy the National Guard in American cities to retaliate against political protests? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit grappled with that question over the past week, although it failed to reach anything approaching consensus. On one side, Judge Ryan Nelson (a Trump appointee) argued that courts have no authority at all to halt the president’s domestic mobilization of the Guard. Several of his colleagues believe that courts must give immense deference to the executive branch’s decision that an “emergency” necessitates the use of troops. Still others have warned that judges have a duty to carefully review—and, when necessary, block—any unlawful deployment within the United States.

On this week’s Slate Plus bonus episode of Amicus, co-hosts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed this increasingly heated dispute, and why some members of the court have warned that it amounts to a trial by fire for American self-governance. A preview of their conversation, below, has been edited and condensed for clarity.
 

If there is one question everyone in America is trying to game out at this moment, it’s this one: Can the judiciary impose meaningful checks on President Donald Trump’s ability to deploy the National Guard in American cities to retaliate against political protests? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit grappled with that question over the past week, although it failed to reach anything approaching consensus. On one side, Judge Ryan Nelson (a Trump appointee) argued that courts have no authority at all to halt the president’s domestic mobilization of the Guard. Several of his colleagues believe that courts must give immense deference to the executive branch’s decision that an “emergency” necessitates the use of troops. Still others have warned that judges have a duty to carefully review—and, when necessary, block—any unlawful deployment within the United States.

On this week’s Slate Plus bonus episode of Amicus, co-hosts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed this increasingly heated dispute, and why some members of the court have warned that it amounts to a trial by fire for American self-governance. A preview of their conversation, below, has been edited and condensed for clarity.
trump = chaos
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Back
Top