plus a team now knows that they have him sown up for 4 years. last year if we had traded him, he could have walked with them getting nothing if he wanted to
wasn't there also a comment in Locke's podcast around the mood of the players and all the losing really pulling them down?
i thought that was a good comment around the players actually wanted to play to try and win. i can imagine that playing to lose would take it's toll...
i don't think you're a moron, i just think there's a much better chance of striking gold with someone we get at #3 vs. someone we'd get at #21. there aren't that many Gobert's out there we can find and usually there's a reason a guy is picked at #21. i'm just a fan of maximizing our chances of...
exactly. he's extremely redundant when you factor in Castle and Fox. Lauri on the Spurs would be sick and we'd get Harper. then we could draft whomever is left at #5. that's my dream scenario.
i disagree. you have a much better shot at hitting on the draft with the higher picks. i would definitely do this to increase our odds. #2 or 3 definitely a better chance at being a building block then #21. not sure what you're thinking. and trading Lauri gives us the opportunity to tank...
i get it. idk if i would or not as Fox is already proven... however, i'd have the conversation with both Spurs and 76ers to see... we could make a pretty nice offer....
i like the way you're thinking and this would be such a great get if we could do that. i would be open to trading Lauri for that pick... i'm sure there could be some other assets involved, but this would also be on the Embid timeline...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.