Search results

The Clips are not trading Bledsoe until Paul (Chris) is inked. Hayward for Bledsoe might interest them (in some configuration), but only in the offseason.

Dallas works great as the 3rd team in a deal, but they don't have anything for our future. That said, I wouldn't mind if Brandon Wright wound up on our team (assuming another big got dealt.) I really don't know a lot about him, but he's put up the craziest PER's for a guy who can never seem to...

Nash and Rondo would obviously fit the bill as well, but I can't those deals working. Boston would want one of the bigs, and LA would want Sap and either Burks/Hayward. But Sap/Marvin Williams would be worth the swap (for us).

I'm not a Jennings fan, but the only guys the Jazz should be targeting for PG are guys who excel in the PnR. With Favors and Kanter still working out post games (and an offensive system that is offensive), a good PnR PG would solve a ton of problems. Top 2 guys in that department who could be...

Watching in the 3rd I was thinking how unbelievable it was that not one player played bad. Marvin didn't have a game for the ages, and I was calling for Carroll to get put back in, but whatever. Al and Hayward were monsters, Sap was bad ***, Foye played within himself. And the little things...

Wow! Just got around to the game tonight and I cannot believe what I saw. For 2 1/2 quarters we looked like we had a real offense. For basically 4 quarters we played great D. And the composure not to fold down the stretch brought a little tear to my eye. Jazz basketball is back (at least...

Put it this way: I get Ty's decision to put Earl in to protect a lead. I'm not super defending it, either. But I'm more macro than micro. I don't really sweat these kinds of decisions. I'm a lot more concerned that our offense continues to look like total dog****. Whether we win or lose a...

It was actually just a bad play by Watson. He picked up his dribble for almost no reason. Mistakes happen.

Personally, I had no problem with the subs. I'm with Duck on Watson, and Al played very well on D tonight. That said, at some point you have to take the training wheels off Burks. The one thought I had was that I would have liked to see Burks get the ball on the final possession. The thing...

This is Ty's idea of "adapting": In recent weeks, the inevitable double in the post was countered with Tinsley/Watson as the outlet. Tonight we saw Hayward taking those passes. While Hayward is a better shooter, he's not threat to drive, and thus there's only a marginal advantage to it. What...

On offense, we basically won that game on post Iso's. We can win that way, but not very often. Some nice interior passing between Al and Sap put a little shine on the turd, but it's ridiculous how many possessions we have that don't even sniff a shot for 18 seconds. We never get easy shots...

Good gutty win. D was the story. Offense still sick as a dog. Corbin has no idea why we won or why we almost lost.

Nothing will change until the coach changes.

I don't usually overanalyze quotes by either coaches or players, but this is alarming.

You're absolutely right. And I firmly believe he's been told what subjects he can't discuss and that #1 on that list is criticism of Ty. It just gets maddening to listen to the Jazz's delegated mouthpiece pretend at being an expert numbers guy, yet completely disregard the dysfunction of our...

Realistically, the Jazz won't fire him. They'll wait until he fails next year with the young guys. That's a year too late, but I hope it happens sooner. He just doesn't know how to coach a dynamic offense.

Or it's just typical Locke being a shill.

Just as a side question: Is anyone less insightful than Thurl Bailey? I can't remember the last thing he said that didn't sound like he looked at a box sheet and made up some obvious comment. He's just awful.

Our defense was actually pretty good. Getting back on the break not so good.

On positive notes, it was thrilling to hope Randy Foye would get put back in the game.