Search results

How about join and at least start and if you decide that you’re thinking too hard just quit

Why?

Tastes like a lollipop Two things you are overlooking. 1 Hayward was a strong defender on the perimeter and he played on a much better team. Best player on a rebuilding team will have more inflated stats. Hayward was a floor setter that didn’t dominate the ball to extreme levels he was a ball...

So, is 175 good for a cap or is the 153 or whatever?

I’ve toned things down you should join.

I’ll look at the numbers but I want this to be somewhat difficult and painful I want it to be easy to screw up your cap if we have to skip players I’m fine with that.

Would the salary cap just be what it currently is? Are we using the soft cap or just the hard cap?

Ok let’s do it. Still looking for lineups from @Elizah Huge and from @Elizah Huge i will make lineups for you tomorrow if I don’t get one today.

If I don’t get them by end of day I’ll just create a lineup for them from who they drafted as best I can

I still need lineups from @silesian @Hornacekamania @Coach Ellis @Elizah Huge

Still waiting for half the league to send lineups.

I suspect next year in the all time bad draft he will be a first round pick :p

Also scorers are dime a dozen, hell if you played Brice 30 min a game he could easily score you 20 a game. Imo

But that’s all he did. Hayward did pretty much everything and he was a really good defender

If no one else joins today we will start tomorrow

As much as I’d like to say Lauri… he only really did two things better, score and rebound and he’s 5 inches taller. Hayward basically did everything else better

But it’s not.

I’d take Chet no contest. Better with the ball pretty close shot making Chet is the better defender. Blocks shots and a great passer for a big. He just does way more and is quite a bit younger.

So this is your schtick now. Lol

I’m on top of it. He knows he’s on thin ice and one mess up he’s gone. I also have his number