#1 Pick to Utah?

[Fishsticks]

Is there anyone but spence checketts saying this? I'd like a second source.

 

[bigmike]

I'd be stunned if we moved up to #1 and took Wiggins over Parker. The whole world knows (or thinks they know) that we're gushing over Jabari.

Though I'd be stunned if we traded Favors, too, so I clearly know nothing.

 

[Fishsticks]

It's a great move for Cavs.
They get a starting center in Favors and can still gamble on Embiid.
Jazz get Parker or Wiggins and still have a starting center in Kanter.

I've wanted Parker, but if we move Favors we better take wiggins. Holly **** would we be bad with Parker and Burke on the wings and kanter down low.

 

[gregbroncs]

I'd be stunned if we moved up to #1 and took Wiggins over Parker. The whole world knows (or thinks they know) that we're gushing over Jabari.

Though I'd be stunned if we traded Favors, too, so I clearly know nothing.

That is the great thing about this franchise. They are great at deflecting their real intentions.

 

[Fishsticks]

I'd be stunned if we moved up to #1 and took Wiggins over Parker. The whole world knows (or thinks they know) that we're gushing over Jabari.

Though I'd be stunned if we traded Favors, too, so I clearly know nothing.

Ford mentioned that though we the fans are high on Parker, he thinks Lindsey clearly is in love with Wiggins.

 

[Goodluckchuck]

I've wanted Parker, but if we move Favors we better take wiggins. Holly **** would we be bad with Parker and Burke on the wings and kanter down low.

It would be a disaster on the defensive side. And those who think Gobert can fill that spot are in for a rude awakening when teams run the high PnR against him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[slc]

This deal would almost have to be approved and orchestrated by Bucks, Sixers, Magic.
They would have to agree to let Embiid slide to Cavs.
Jazz and them would have sort out who each team wants before the draft.

 

[Hotdog]

Right, I don't disagree with that. And I said I would probably do it for Wiggins.
.
But if they make this trade and end up with Parker, I for one will be frustrated. You don't trade your only defensive piece for a chance to move up and draft another one dimensional player. Who has a great chance of making the worst defense in the league worse. All while being an inefficient offensive one dimensional player to boot. I've never been sold on Parker as a franchise player.

Well, I'm sold on Jabari. Not so much Wiggins. I'd take a chance on both though.

 

[Doublea]

I'd be stunned if we moved up to #1 and took Wiggins over Parker. The whole world knows (or thinks they know) that we're gushing over Jabari.

Though I'd be stunned if we traded Favors, too, so I clearly know nothing.

You mean the media are gushing over Jabari for utah.

 

[gregbroncs]

This deal would almost have to be approved and orchestrated by Bucks, Sixers, Magic.
They would have to agree to let Embiid slide to Cavs.
Jazz and them would have sort out who each team wants before the draft.

Not really. If Embiid gets picked there are other bigs available later. Randle, Vonleh and Gordon could all be there if Embiid isn't. Part of the reason they might want to do this is because they are leary of Embiid's injury and want a big.

 

[Doublea]

This deal would almost have to be approved and orchestrated by Bucks, Sixers, Magic.
They would have to agree to let Embiid slide to Cavs.
Jazz and them would have sort out who each team wants before the draft.

? I actually doubt the Cavs would still draft Embiid at #5.

 

[The Fresh Prince]

7 days til my mansap fly gents. It's gunna be a whiteout up in my house. #wegettinwigginaiiiiight #onasafarifordatnukkajabari