What's new
By:

(17-10) Jazz @ (18-10) Grizzlies - Gamethread

Ellis269 said:
No reason to skip Exum. Jazz could have drafted Jokic instead of Stokes in the 2nd. The better question is - If we could redo the 2014 season, should we have played JLIII a lot more and pushed harder for the #1 pick? Corbin switched to Burke because he wanted to save his job. I'd have fired him mid season and tanked properly for a better shot at Wiggins/Parker.
Click to expand...

I think I would rather have Jokic than either Wiggins or Parker tbh
 
I give credit to Snyder that taught to the team to compete in every game no matter the injury situation since last season!
 
dalamon said:
I think I would rather have Jokic than either Wiggins or Parker tbh
Click to expand...

No way. Jokic would have had a tough time getting minutes and getting exposure on this team. Wiggins would be able to get minutes on this team and at least be a trade piece.
 
DutchJazzer said:
Lol, are science deniers and dislike my assessment of a complex problem! so they dislike my post!
Click to expand...

Shooters hit their percentages, those percentage don't change based on making or missing their last shot. Hot or cold streaks have been shown not to be real. That free throw percentage might not be right. He could be going up or down from it but it is the best number we have to do math from. Although I would say both math numbers were wrong but I don't really want to delve into it. Sorry you got your feelings hurt with disliking your incorrect post. I should know better, you are quite sensitive.
 
The undefeated Gamethread/GT Girl streak continues!! 6 - 0

200_s.gif
 
Ellis269 said:
No reason to skip Exum. Jazz could have drafted Jokic instead of Stokes in the 2nd. The better question is - If we could redo the 2014 season, should we have played JLIII a lot more and pushed harder for the #1 pick? Corbin switched to Burke because he wanted to save his job. I'd have fired him mid season and tanked properly for a better shot at Wiggins/Parker.
Click to expand...

How bad was JLIII that Trey Burke was substantially better than him.... Guys never forget... it is a great time to be a jazz fan.
 
silesian said:
Right now, clearly.

Fingers crossed for "sustainably" ????? Can Rudy keep this up?

And I love Gasol.
Click to expand...

Normally I would say that the player will come back to earth. Gobert is not a typical player. I am not betting against him, he will keep this going and will get even better next season.

He is, IMO, the premier rim protector and defensive anchor in the NBA. He is an offensive threat (again, I was wrong) and energy player. He is a legit rebounding presence.

What will he add next year? Elite passing skills?
 
Stoked said:
Normally I would say that the player will come back to earth. Gobert is not a typical player. I am not betting against him, he will keep this going and will get even better next season.

He is, IMO, the premier rim protector and defensive anchor in the NBA. He is an offensive threat (again, I was wrong) and energy player. He is a legit rebounding presence.

What will he add next year? Elite passing skills?
Click to expand...
Two years with Diaw? Maybe that's a realistic possibility. Right now I love that he's not trying to do more than he's capable of on the offensive end. Everything he does is efficient. His screens, hands and free throws are all significantly better than last year. It's clear that he identified his deficiencies and then made a real effort to improve them. Imagine the potential for improvement with a whole offseason NOT devoted to the French national team.
 
Ron Mexico said:
Shooters hit their percentages, those percentage don't change based on making or missing their last shot. Hot or cold streaks have been shown not to be real. That free throw percentage might not be right. He could be going up or down from it but it is the best number we have to do math from. Although I would say both math numbers were wrong but I don't really want to delve into it. Sorry you got your feelings hurt with disliking your incorrect post. I should know better, you are quite sensitive.
Click to expand...



science denier
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top