What's new
By:
Filters

2 Solutions We Have On Our Roster Right Now

Saint Cy of JFC said:
So a handful sample size overtakes recent history?
Click to expand...

If Ed is that type of dude that will revert back to his good play of his previous years, then he will organically rip the backup role to Rudy out of Bradley's hands. Are we that allergic to competition for places at the club? If Davis wants it, go get it. Also, what's wrong with playing Bradley whilst he was a little bit on a purple patch, and then when/if Ed takes it from him, we go with Ed?
 
Dali said:
If Ed is that type of dude that will revert back to his good play of his previous years, then he will organically rip the backup role to Rudy out of Bradley's hands. Are we that allergic to competition for places at the club? If Davis wants it, go get it. Also, what's wrong with playing Bradley whilst he was a little bit on a purple patch, and then when/if Ed takes it from him, we go with Ed?
Click to expand...
Im sure the competition takes place in practice.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Im sure the competition takes place in practice.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif


You've voluntarily entered yourself into complete meme territory. Congratulations.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I mean, I'm a Bradley supporter, but he in no way "deserves to play" over Ed Davis.
Click to expand...

If Quin is going to stick with Green/Niang at the forward spots then there's no reason to play Davis over Bradley.

The ONLY reason to play a Green/Niang forward combination is for spacing. The reason you want spacing is so that you can get either a good three point look or an easy finish. Davis is not a finisher at the rim. Bradley is, it's one of his strengths.

Furthermore, Green and Niang are such an abysmal combination on the glass that it's negating the value of Davis as a rebounder. At 6'9 225 he can't outfight 3 other bigs by himself for boards. Bradley eats glass with his size. He's bigger than most out there.

That Davis/Green/Niang trio just doesn't work at very fundamental levels. Time for changes.
 
SCS said:
If Quin is going to stick with Green/Niang at the forward spots then there's no reason to play Davis over Bradley.

The ONLY reason to play a Green/Niang forward combination is for spacing. The reason you want spacing is so that you can get either a good three point look or an easy finish. Davis is not a finisher at the rim. Bradley is, it's one of his strengths.

Furthermore, Green and Niang are such an abysmal combination on the glass that it's negating the value of Davis as a rebounder. At 6'9 225 he can't outfight 3 other bigs by himself for boards. Bradley eats glass with his size. He's bigger than most out there.

That Davis/Green/Niang trio just doesn't work at very fundamental levels. Time for changes.
Click to expand...
What?
 
SCS said:
If Quin is going to stick with Green/Niang at the forward spots then there's no reason to play Davis over Bradley.

The ONLY reason to play a Green/Niang forward combination is for spacing. The reason you want spacing is so that you can get either a good three point look or an easy finish. Davis is not a finisher at the rim. Bradley is, it's one of his strengths.

Furthermore, Green and Niang are such an abysmal combination on the glass that it's negating the value of Davis as a rebounder. At 6'9 225 he can't outfight 3 other bigs by himself for boards. Bradley eats glass with his size. He's bigger than most out there.

That Davis/Green/Niang trio just doesn't work at very fundamental levels. Time for changes.
Click to expand...
In what world is Tony Bradley a better defensive rebounder than Ed DAvis?
 
Bradley does not eat glass. He misses a lot of easy shots where he can get the offensive rebound. He's a solid defensive rebounder, but no stats (and again, everything with Tony is very small SS) say he is better at defensive rebounding than Davis
 
Like, Davis makes way more sense than Bradley with Niang and Green.

Bradley is a stationary rebounder and Davis is an active rebounder. Jazzs issue is that they have too many stationary rebounders.
 
Last year Ed Davis had one of the best defensive rebounding % in league history last year but we want to act like Tony Bradley should replace him because he had a bad start to the year?

Are we smoking crack?

Like honestly, how dumb are we trying to be? I've been the biggest TB supporter here, but the fact is that he just isnt close to being better than what Davis has been the last few seasons. And this year, with Davis playing like ****, it's at best dead even. Davis advanced defensive stats still blow TB's out of the water and that's what they signed him for.
 
Davis would have to play at this current level for another month before you even entertain replacing him with Bradley.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Last year Ed Davis had one of the best defensive rebounding % in league history last year but we want to act like Tony Bradley should replace him because he had a bad start to the year?

Are we smoking crack?

Like honestly, how dumb are we trying to be? I've been the biggest TB supporter here, but the fact is that he just isnt close to being better than what Davis has been the last few seasons. And this year, with Davis playing like ****, it's at best dead even. Davis advanced defensive stats still blow TB's out of the water and that's what they signed him for.
Click to expand...
Lol

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top