What's new

2013 BEAST JazzFanz Current Players Only - OFFICIAL DRAFT THREAD

Love is a 25/13 guy with range out to anywhere. Thats top 5 is both scoring and rebounding. He is as Aplha as I could get with that selection without picking a point guard or an old guard.

Parker is ten times the alpha... and your dogmatism to go big is your own issue; it's not required of this or any other game (real or imagined). You're on the hook for that choice.

But whatever... nobody (including you) can argue against the fact that Love is unproven.

What do you call an Alpha that's never sniffed the playoffs?

For me, there's very little debating this:

Parker + Millsap (5th round) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Love + whoever the **** you end up with at PG.

All day.
 
Kawhi was a tough decision, tbh. There are lots of other wings that put up bigger stats, but I felt he helps with the chemistry of a team much better. His style of basketball results in more wins than some of the other wings left, even if he doesn't score as much. Glad others feel the same way.

And I agree with Hack and company. There's no reason to draft 8 players if we're only going to use 5. I doubt anyone will switch up their lineup between rounds with one of their later picks.
 
Kawhi was a tough decision, tbh. There are lots of other wings that put up bigger stats, but I felt he helps with the chemistry of a team much better. His style of basketball results in more wins than some of the other wings left, even if he doesn't score as much. Glad others feel the same way.

And I agree with Hack and company. There's no reason to draft 8 players if we're only going to use 5. I doubt anyone will switch up their lineup between rounds with one of their later picks.

We have to do at least 6 tho because it needs to be an even number of rounds for teh snake to work.


Retiring at 20,000
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];647121 said:
Parker is ten times the alpha... and your dogmatism to go big is your own issue; it's not required of this or any other game (real or imagined). You're on the hook for that choice.

But whatever... nobody (including you) can argue against the fact that Love is unproven.

What do you call an Alpha that's never sniffed the playoffs?

For me, there's very little debating this:

Parker + Millsap (5th round) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Love + whoever the **** you end up with at PG.

All day.

Bro, have you ever considered putting the money where your mouth is and enter one of these competitions, instead of running your mouth over everyone else???
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];647124 said:
Kawhi was a great choice. I'd take him over Batum 8 days a week.

LOL.. no stats no nothing to back it up. I guess we'll just have to take your "word" for it then?
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];647129 said:
I can't/won't sit next to a computer in order to do it. I pop in and out as I please. Anything else is stupid.

Isn't that what you're doing right now?
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];647135 said:
You want to compare Kawhi and Batum's playoff stats?

You want me to speculate about how Kawhi would perform on a **** Blazers team?

Shut up before you get buried.

Yeah because it would be fair to compare someone who plays for Popovich with a cast of Tim Duncan, Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili ... and someone who plays for Terry Stotts.
 
Isn't that what you're doing right now?

I'm sitting here now. I won't be in a moment. I won't commit to a schedule of sitting here. What's hard to understand?




By the way, I love this little diversion of yours. Instead of agreeing that I owned Hack in our little debate, you decide to throw yourself on his funeral pyre. Cute thing to do for a BroEYE.
 
Back
Top