What's new

2013 BEAST JazzFanz Current Players Only - OFFICIAL DRAFT THREAD

winnie-2.jpg
 
And what the hell is the point of picking more than you will be playing?

I dont see people changing their line up for matchups. Its more like a bailout for those that screwed up.
 
And what the hell is the point of picking more than you will be playing?

I dont see people changing their line up for matchups. Its more like a bailout for those that screwed up.

Well you're supposed to be able to change the line-up depending on match-up.


That was the whole idea of this tournament.
 
One thing we could do is draft 8 players (an 8 man rotation) and everyone's bench must consist of a big, wing, and PG.

This is the best idea yet.


We're already doing the damn draft, let's GO-ALL-THE-WAY.

Benefits

- It's also the most fair for people picking lower.

- It's also in accordance with the original rule.

- Plus it adds another layer of depth to the discussion.
 
We need to have 6 players count or else it hugely, HUGELY favors the people with early draft positions.

It also makes sense because in real life teams are often judged by starters + a 6th man, and it also allows for A little more strategy than just picking one player of each position.


£¥£ Retiring at 20,000 £¥£
 
We need to have 6 players count or else it hugely, HUGELY favors the people with early draft positions.

It also makes sense because in real life teams are often judged by starters + a 6th man, and it also allows for A little more strategy than just picking one player of each position.


£¥£ Retiring at 20,000 £¥£

This.
 
We need to have 6 players count or else it hugely, HUGELY favors the people with early draft positions.

It also makes sense because in real life teams are often judged by starters + a 6th man, and it also allows for A little more strategy than just picking one player of each position.


£¥£ Retiring at 20,000 £¥£

I can go along with this as well.
 
Back
Top