By opening your mind to the other person's argument rather than totally dismissing it because of your own personal bias. That would be a good start.
Pot
By opening your mind to the other person's argument rather than totally dismissing it because of your own personal bias. That would be a good start.
By your logic UCLA was an awesome team when Utah played them, and it was on the road. So isn't that pretty damn impressive too? Add in a win vs USC and one less loss, and yea, LSU shouldn't have jumped Utah.So after losing to teams who were ranked #2 and #3 (1 is now #1 and the other #4), they should be automatically unranked? I guess it depends on what the teams who are ranked around them are. I doubt any team below them had a very strong argument to be over them.
Then they beat the #3 overall team with a defensively dominant performance. How can you not expect a huge bump in the rankings? I don't get people complaining about LSU's ranking jump.
SEC Roolz, PAC-12 Droolz
By your logic UCLA was an awesome team when Utah played them, and it was on the road. So isn't that pretty damn impressive too? Add in a win vs USC and one less loss, and yea, LSU shouldn't have jumped Utah.
So you agree that we are the best but disagree that ours wins/losses should be weighted differently since we are, by your own admission, playing higher quality teams within our conference (that also schedules more OOC ranked opponets per team)?

Says you. How do you know I didn't take his or your argument into account? If it's easier for you just to say pot than to admit that I did. So be it.
Would you prefer a pat on the head?
![]()
I don't drink soda. I prefer a cocktail on your dime.
Yes, great wins.
LSU's big win was more impressive than those 2 combined though.
Utah's loss is a worse loss than the 2 LSU losses combined.
Pretty sure the experts agree with me cuz they ranked LSU ahead of Utah.