What's new
By:

2015-2016 NBA Thread

I wonder why people are not suspecting that Stephen Curry might use doping, when they are alerted and suspicious when some cyclist is winning TdF, Giro or Vuelta in the same year?
I am still a big fan of Lance Armstrong; IMHO it is still not that unproven, that he won those tours thanks to banned substances. I think that even some skier, cyclist etc from Estonia has so far given more urine samples, than Stephen Curry. Also, for example, when Team Dream won the Barcelona olympics - the other teams (and journalists) did not accuse them for doping. However, if somebody else is dominant, then the witchhunt begins.
 
lauriandres said:
I wonder why people are not suspecting that Stephen Curry might use doping, when they are alerted and suspicious when some cyclist is winning TdF, Giro or Vuelta in the same year?
I am still a big fan of Lance Armstrong; IMHO it is still not that unproven, that he won those tours thanks to banned substances. I think that even some skier, cyclist etc from Estonia has so far given more urine samples, than Stephen Curry. Also, for example, when Team Dream won the Barcelona olympics - the other teams (and journalists) did not accuse them for doping. However, if somebody else is dominant, then the witchhunt begins.
Click to expand...
Drugs can make you the best shooter in the world?

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
 
spycam1 said:
Drugs can make you the best shooter in the world?

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I would like to clarify, i like Curry. And i dislike WADA. Of course, i dislike doping too; actually i dislike if somebody says "i do not use doping" and afterwards got busted. My post was little bit sarcastic as IMHO everybody says that "you can't be superstar without using enhancements one way or another". Also, IMHO are you sure that if WADA would be as strict as it is with other sportsmen it would not find anything in basketball players? IMHO there has not been any live experiments with a lot of people to verify whether the specific component really helps or not. In cycling, how can you verify, that did you win the stage because you were good or you won because the opposition sucked?
 
lauriandres said:
I would like to clarify, i like Curry. And i dislike WADA. Of course, i dislike doping too; actually i dislike if somebody says "i do not use doping" and afterwards got busted. My post was little bit sarcastic as IMHO everybody says that "you can't be superstar without using enhancements one way or another". Also, IMHO are you sure that if WADA would be as strict as it is with other sportsmen it would not find anything in basketball players? IMHO there has not been any live experiments with a lot of people to verify whether the specific component really helps or not. In cycling, how can you verify, that did you win the stage because you were good or you won because the opposition sucked?
Click to expand...

True. He also might be using witchcraft. Someone should look into that. We shouldn't dismiss an idea just because it's mind-numbingly stupid.
 
Check out this sweet drawing I've come across.

azV61NN_700b.jpg
 
lauriandres said:
I wonder why people are not suspecting that Stephen Curry might use doping, when they are alerted and suspicious when some cyclist is winning TdF, Giro or Vuelta in the same year?
I am still a big fan of Lance Armstrong; IMHO it is still not that unproven, that he won those tours thanks to banned substances. I think that even some skier, cyclist etc from Estonia has so far given more urine samples, than Stephen Curry. Also, for example, when Team Dream won the Barcelona olympics - the other teams (and journalists) did not accuse them for doping. However, if somebody else is dominant, then the witchhunt begins.
Click to expand...
What kind of drugs did you take before making this post?
 
lauriandres said:
I would like to clarify, i like Curry. And i dislike WADA. Of course, i dislike doping too; actually i dislike if somebody says "i do not use doping" and afterwards got busted. My post was little bit sarcastic as IMHO everybody says that "you can't be superstar without using enhancements one way or another". Also, IMHO are you sure that if WADA would be as strict as it is with other sportsmen it would not find anything in basketball players? IMHO there has not been any live experiments with a lot of people to verify whether the specific component really helps or not. In cycling, how can you verify, that did you win the stage because you were good or you won because the opposition sucked?
Click to expand...
As for your cycling questions, you come off sounding like someone who does not have the slightest clue about endurance athletics. There is no question whatsoever that blood doping gives you a competitive advantage in pro cycling. To suggest that the competition in the Tour de France sucked is moronic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top