Roster stability and coaching are the most important factors when it comes to the difference between rookies looking like 15 year olds and rookies having situational value plus it's really exciting to see the development process of a 20 year old potential future superstar.
Unfortunately teams that have the best odds at landing the most enticing talent usually are poorly coached and don't have a stable roster.
Following well coached middle of the pack teams w/o a true superstar integrate a rook in their roster is usually hella fun.
Myles Turner is probably the only reason I watch the Pacers at times this season. Frank Vogel is a very good coach, but the team is in no mans land. And they most likely won't be able to add legit talent to put them back into contention.
Every time I tune in it also saddens me to see Monta Ellis suffering from not having Nowitzki as the screener and multiple other guys who want to handle the ball a lot, but amplify Ellis's weaknesses so much.
Unfortunately teams that have the best odds at landing the most enticing talent usually are poorly coached and don't have a stable roster.
Following well coached middle of the pack teams w/o a true superstar integrate a rook in their roster is usually hella fun.
Myles Turner is probably the only reason I watch the Pacers at times this season. Frank Vogel is a very good coach, but the team is in no mans land. And they most likely won't be able to add legit talent to put them back into contention.
Every time I tune in it also saddens me to see Monta Ellis suffering from not having Nowitzki as the screener and multiple other guys who want to handle the ball a lot, but amplify Ellis's weaknesses so much.
