lauriandres
Well-Known Member
I am saying that it is not the fault of the runner who can afford sneakers that some other runner does not have the same resources. Running the marathon with sneakers is not a right that is specified in the constitution or somewhere similar. I would also like take a part in some competition - showed the organisers edit the rules so that i can also have chance of winning? Whether it is the running or tour around the world with a yacht.Your analogy doesn't quite fit.
In the NBA, teams in big cities like New York, LA, etc, have a lot more money to spend due to their geographical location because of the spending power of their fan base. Therefore the teams are more likely to be able to afford the Luxury Tax, meaning the Luxury Tax rule clearly favors those big market teams vs small market teams that cannot afford to pay the Tax.
The hard cap, on the other hand, would impact all teams equally as their financial status do not come into play like the Luxury tax does.
Going back to your runner analogy, it would be like some runners running in sneakers and some runners running barefoot. With everything else being equal, which runners do you think would have a better chance at winning a marathon?
Another problem is that NBA is not a league, more like a franchise. Every team needs other teams and all have to be friends with each other. Not like Karpov vs Kasparov.
