What's new

2016-17 NBA PLAYOFFS THREAD

So you think somehow the other 29 teams are getting 79 prospects before Utah touches one? And that's going to happen every year?

In this FA rookie world is there salary restrictions for Rookies like there are now? If not I think that could/would ruin the league since teams would overpay for the top picks every year. Things like that could help the Jazz if big market teams drop the bank on some rookie they think will be the next big thing and they are a bust. Although every team is at a huge risk for that but would be required to pay them a lot for a chance to sign any decent rookie prospect.
 
In this FA rookie world is there salary restrictions for Rookies like there are now? If not I think that could/would ruin the league since teams would overpay for the top picks every year. Things like that could help the Jazz if big market teams drop the bank on some rookie they think will be the next big thing and they are a bust. Although every team is at a huge risk for that but would be required to pay them a lot for a chance to sign any decent rookie prospect.

IDK, not sure on all the rules and how to best do it.

I liked the rookie voucher rule, each team gets two and they can trade them. That would prevent one team from just outright signing a ton of players. I think it would be better for their not to be a cap to how much you can pay rookies, just treat them like regular free agents.

You could take the voucher concept a step forward and designate two separate vouchers, one that allows you to spend an unlimited amount on a single rookie's contract and another that has a cap to it. That would effectively act as something that would prevent one team from getting two star players (or two players that are deemed to be high value on the market, they could still get lucky and find a player no one else was high on that ends up being a star) in 1 draft (unless they traded for two uncapped vouchers).

So incoming rookies would have 3 choices: take a bigger uncapped contract offer from a team (only 30 available), take a smaller capped contract offer from a team (only 30 available), or wait until the designated rookie free agent period is over and sign for the rookie minimum with any team.

You could even turn it into a TV even ala National Signing Day where prospects go up to a podium and announce what team they have signed with.
 
Last edited:
IDK, not sure on all the rules and how to best do it.

I liked the rookie voucher rule, each team gets two and they can trade them. That would prevent one team from just outright signing a ton of players. I think it would be better for their not to be a cap to how much you can pay rookies, just treat them like regular free agents.

You could take the voucher concept a step forward and designate two separate vouchers, one that allows you to spend an unlimited amount on a single rookie's contract and another that has a cap to it. That would effectively act as something that would prevent one team from getting two star players (or two players that are deemed to be high value on the market, they could still get lucky and find a player no one else was high on that ends up being a star) in 1 draft (unless they traded for two uncapped vouchers).

So incoming rookies would have 3 choices: take a bigger uncapped contract offer from a team (only 30 available), take a smaller capped contract offer from a team (only 30 available), or wait until the designated rookie free agent period is over and sign for the rookie minimum with any team.

You could even turn it into a TV even ala National Signing Day where prospects go up to a podium and announce what team they have signed with.

Hmm, I think I would be okay with the Voucher idea if each team got 3. 1 voucher that is on a high rookie salary scale something along the lines of 3-4 years at 5 million per year. Then you get 2 at lower rookie scale but they can be lower years as well. Like maybe 2-4 years at 1-2 million per year. I definitely want rookie scale contracts though, no limits on the amount you can spend on rookies would ruin the league very fast. Rookies would be the highest paid players outside of a couple elite players, based on potential and teams needing to get an elite player to win it all.
 
How many kids coming out of college are going to CHOOSE to go spend there early 20's in Utah???

You'd be hoping for a lot of home grown white boys or internationals. Good luck with that.
This.
 
Hmm, I think I would be okay with the Voucher idea if each team got 3. 1 voucher that is on a high rookie salary scale something along the lines of 3-4 years at 5 million per year. Then you get 2 at lower rookie scale but they can be lower years as well. Like maybe 2-4 years at 1-2 million per year. I definitely want rookie scale contracts though, no limits on the amount you can spend on rookies would ruin the league very fast. Rookies would be the highest paid players outside of a couple elite players, based on potential and teams needing to get an elite player to win it all.

Why 3? Teams only have 2 picks in the current system. The likelihood of a team regularly using all 3 vouchers would be rare and it would just create too much of a surplus and make them less valuable trade chips.

If teams want to ruin themselves by overpaying for rookies that is their prerogative. I dont think it would be that big of an issue.

If teams just over-payed for rookies constantly that would eventually show up and the rookies would start getting paid less because no one would have cap room to sign rookies past the MLE (or w/e the rookie equivalent of the MLE would be for rookies). I just hate the idea of max contracts and protecting teams from their own stupidity. Max contracts dont properly value the difference between top players as everyone in the top 60 or so of players gets paid equally, and the same concept would apply to rookies. Top rookies shouldn't get paid same, their pay should reflect what the market is willing to pay them and that would be better for competition.
 
Back
Top