Its nice to read the write ups but they have no impact on my voting. Better players win games regardless of strategy.
That’s not true at all.
2011 NBA Finals
Its nice to read the write ups but they have no impact on my voting. Better players win games regardless of strategy.
Its nice to read the write ups but they have no impact on my voting. Better players win games regardless of strategy.
That’s not true at all.
2011 NBA Finals
Sometimes but not overall. Plus even stating a strategy doesnt really change that for the voting.Great players often do not fit with teammates or systems or strategies. Teams with more talent sometimes lose. .
But the mavs had xx xxxx.
Horford is a bum.
Ron has Giannis and Kawhi. I have Harden and Draymond.
I’d argue Tatum was a bigger reason why they made the ECF.
How can you say Horford is a bum when you are the Drummond hype man?
Are we allowed to discuss undrafted players? I slipped and mentioned a scrub,then deleted. But I remember people going thermonuclear on this in the past.
I'm pretty sure it's just thee that freaks out as usual. But it's probably better not to mention players undrafted.Are we allowed to discuss undrafted players? I slipped and mentioned a scrub,then deleted. But I remember people going thermonuclear on this in the past.
I can see if you have someone "under the radar" on your board and someone mentions this player who then gets drafted, they might be pissed.I'm pretty sure it's just thee that freaks out as usual. But it's probably better not to mention players undrafted.