What's new
By:

2023 annual Jazzfanz all time NBA draft

There it is, Steph was the other guy I wanted to take. Drafted 00-09 range, which is nice since 2010-present players seem plentiful. Didn't know about taking 2015-16 season or last years FMVP. But just a huge Steph fan overall. Shaq felt safer in the end but glad I wasn't super far off on my evaluation.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
There it is, Steph was the other guy I wanted to take. Drafted 00-09 range, which is nice since 2010-present players seem plentiful. Didn't know about taking 2015-16 season or last years FMVP. But just a huge Steph fan overall. Shaq felt safer in the end but glad I wasn't super far off on my evaluation.
Click to expand...

Seems like you have the hang of it already. 6-7 is the earliest I would have considered him and definitely wouldn’t have let him fall past 8. Stoked to grab him at 13.
 
Keefe said:
Dude, you’re a retard then.

It’s simple af and tedious but shouldn’t take more than 5-10 minutes. Three words. Copy and paste.
Click to expand...

Take it easy on him. I’ll call the nursing home and tell the locked unit nurse he forgot to swallow his meds again.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Because put prime Hakeem on the floor and I don’t know if there was a better two-way player ever.
Click to expand...
I mean if you were going to take the best attributes from all the greatest centers you’d pretty much have built a Hakeem clone. Aside from shooting threes he could do pretty much anything and seeing he came up in the mid 80’s and had he came up now he’d probably be a good to great 3pt shooter. He could hit 15-20 ft shots with ease.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Because put prime Hakeem on the floor and I don’t know if there was a better two-way player ever.
Click to expand...
Picking the year is interesting to me. Would anyone’s opinion on a matchup ever be swayed because one player had some year picked over another year? That rule seems like it should just be ‘consider this player is at their peak’ which… is kind of just the default reasoning for this kind of exercise.

I know some players went through many different phases and it may be a very important distinction at some points. But having trouble thinking of any example where the year a person picked would actually sway my opinion.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Picking the year is interesting to me. Would anyone’s opinion on a matchup ever be swayed because one player had some year picked over another year? That rule seems like it should just be ‘consider this player is at their peak’ which… is kind of just the default reasoning for this kind of exercise.

I know some players went through many different phases and it may be a very important distinction at some points. But having trouble thinking of any example where the year a person picked would actually sway my opinion.
Click to expand...
It would sway mine. There has been a massive change in shot profiles starting in the 90’s.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top