It will be harder to win them all. Sure they will win some and lose some.We play some of the losers in the east soon. It's going to be really hard not to win all those games
It will be harder to win them all. Sure they will win some and lose some.We play some of the losers in the east soon. It's going to be really hard not to win all those games
Building off this thought, I used B-Ref to see the standings on December 30 in each of those years (a few years of lockout means a few years' data were missing).NBA.com has team win% since 1996-1997, so the past 28 years. There has only been one other year (1997) that has had more than 3 teams finish with a record of 0.250 or lower. The average number of teams that finish with a record of 0.250 or lower is 1.89. (Yes, I've had a lot of time on my hands pretending to be busy at work today).
Either teams are going to start winning games because this pace is unsustainable, or we are looking at the largest group of disgusting tanking teams in 27 years.
Wow, nice work!!!Building off this thought, I used B-Ref to see the standings on December 30 in each of those years (a few years of lockout means a few years' data were missing).
There was only one year that was close to the situation this season (with five teams under .250); that was 1997, with 4 teams under .250 at this point of the season along with two other teams that were at .250 exactly. That season led into the 1998 draft (Danny Manning, Rik Smits, Charles Smith, Chris Morris, Mitch Richmond, ...).
Two other years also had as many as 4 teams under .250: 2012 (Anthony Bennett, Victor Oladipo, Otto Porter, Cody Zeller, Alex Len, ...) and 2023 (Risacher, Sarr, Sheppard, Castle, Holland, ...).
Frankly, I'm surprised to see that these drafts were the seasons that had so many teams toward the bottom. Maybe it means that there's not really much connection between draft quality and the commitment of teams to losing.
During Wemby's upcoming draft season, only one team was below a .250 winning percentage on December 30, and Spurs themselves were at .343.
The previous year (with Chet, Paolo), there were two teams below .250. Thunder were at .353.
Yeah, here's another point at which the "general wisdom" about tanking doesn't really match the data very well.Wow, nice work!!!
I've looked in to and noticed the same thing as you, that there is not a positive correlation between draft class and number of tanking teams, and if anything there is a reverse correlation.
Is it a surprise, though? Teams like Washington and Brooklyn have been shedding their good players to make sure they are terrible. And Ainge instead held on his good vets, resigned Markkanen and added Eubanks and Svi. He has done everything in his power to make tanking as difficult as possible.We've been doing a fine job of tanking so far, and in most years we would be set up very nicely for a top 3 odds. We happen to be tanking in a year with more really bad teams than the NBA has seen for at least the last 10 years.
Going to need luck no matter where we end upStarting to get worried we’re not going to be able to tank hard enough to get top 3.
Bad vibesGreat tanking night. Still wonder how NO can play so bad with the players they got, even without Zion and Ingram.
Agree with you. Too much talents, most be the team vibes and issues with stars like Zion. Actually it show to me that having good players help but is not a guarantee.. team chemistry matters a lot.Bad vibes