I would have needed Dillingham to be at least 175 to beat the too small allegations. I just can't at 165 at his age.
I dont have to try that hard to analyze very basic historical context for player weights and size.You always have a couple of horrendous takes where you’re trying WAY too hard.
10 lbs doesn’t matter nearly as much as you’re acting lmaoI would have needed Dillingham to be at least 175 to beat the too small allegations. I just can't at 165 at his age.
It's a huge difference, especially at that size. He has to be Trae Young good offensively to not be a negative on the court.10 lbs doesn’t matter nearly as much as you’re acting lmao
Mike Conley weighs 175 lbs lol you’re so reactiveIt's a huge difference, especially at that size. He has to be Trae Young good offensively to not be a negative on the court.
6'6 winspan on Conley makes up for it and he's one of hte smartest defenders in the NBA.Mike Conley weighs 175 lbs lol you’re so reactive
No because I think he will fill out his frame fine.I don't know about Dillingham but is anybody worried about Buzelis being under 200 lbs at 6'9" no shoes?
Not really. His size was expected. He's going to be 6'10 in shoes which is around what everyone though. Think maybe some said 6'11.I don't know about Dillingham but is anybody worried about Buzelis being under 200 lbs at 6'9" no shoes?